NCT04142684

Brief Summary

The study aims as the principal objective to compare two approaches to diagnosis unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis: transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) measurement versus phrenic nerve conduction (NPC) study. The secondary objective of the study is the strengths and weaknesses of different tests. Diagnostic threshold values.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
28

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 29, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 24, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 24, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 24, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 28, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

September 26, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 27, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Unilateral Diaphragmatic ParalysisDiagnosePhrenic Nerve

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Diaphragm evaluation-compound muscle action potential

    Right and left diaphragm compound muscle action potential (CMAP) : CMAP of Right and left diaphragm were elicited by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of phrenic nerves at the posterior edge of the sternocleido mastoid muscle. They are recorded with two surface electrodes positioned in the eighth intercostal space. The intensity of electrical stimulation was increased until no additional increment in diaphragm CMAP was observed. CMAP amplitude of 300µV or greater and latencies of 9 milliseconds or less were considered normal.

    at 1 month

  • Diaphragm evaluation-transdiaphragmatic pressure

    Transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) was computed as the difference between gastric and esophageal pressure. Pdi was considered normal when magnetic stimulation of both phrenic nerves induced a Pdi change (Pdi Twitch) above 18 cmH2O and unilateral stimulation of each nerve induced a Pdi change (unilat-Pdi Twitch) above 4 cmH2O and ratio of the two unilat-Pdi Twitch \> 0.5. and \< 2.

    at 1 month

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Spirometry

    1 month

  • Lung volume measurements

    1 month

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients suspected unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis with available Pdi and PNC data.

You may qualify if:

  • Patient ≥ 18 years;
  • Available data of Pdi and PNC;
  • Suspected unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis.

You may not qualify if:

  • Abnormalities in thoracic wall which susceptible to modify the investigation's results;
  • Scoliosis;
  • Pleural effusion.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Service de Physiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, APHP, France

Garches, 92380, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Frédéric LOFASO, MD, PhD

    Service de Physiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, APHP, Garches, FRANCE

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Vivien REYNAUD, MD

    Service de Physiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, APHP, Garches, FRANCE

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2019

First Posted

October 29, 2019

Study Start

January 24, 2020

Primary Completion

February 24, 2020

Study Completion

February 24, 2020

Last Updated

September 28, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations