NCT04139200

Brief Summary

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity around the world. Studies revealed that patients with COPD are less active than age-matched healthy controls and activity level decreases with disease severity. Higher levels of physical activity is related to important health-related outcomes, such as lower mortality rate and hospital admissions. Additionally, increasing physical activity is related with substantial health benefits. Patients with COPD have a higher risk of developing insulin resistance, hypertension, dyslipidemia, osteopenia, leading to chronic diseases such as coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis, which have been related to physical inactivity in the healthy population. Moreover, physical inactivity has been related to the occurrence of comorbidities in patients with COPD. Therefore, improving physical activity levels is a recommended treatment in the disease management in all patients with COPD and is implemented in the recent GOLD guidelines for all patients with COPD, regardless of the disease severity. The research group investigated the effect of a 3-month semi-automatic tele-coaching intervention on physical activity levels in patients with COPD. The tele coaching intervention led to a significant improvement on physical activity in the intervention group. Although this trial showed positive results on physical activity, further research is needed, mainly to investigate the long-term (12 months) effectiveness of such interventions and the added value of a smartphone application on top of a simple step counter providing feedback. Additionally, since physical activity is related to the development of comorbidities, the investigators aim to explore the influence of improving physical activity levels on the occurrence of cardiovascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal comorbidities. Finally, this study will explore baseline characteristics (such as social support, self-efficacy, dynamic hyperinflation, etc.) that can predict success in this intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 23, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 25, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 22, 2020

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 11, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 11, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

January 19, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

October 23, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Physical activityTele coaching

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Daily number of steps at 12 months

    Change in daily mean step count 12 months post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Physical activity will be objectively measured for 1 week using a tri-axial accelerometer validated for use in patients with COPD. At least 4 valid weekdays (\> 8 hours of wearing time during waking hours) is necessary to label the physical activity measurement as valid.

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Daily number of steps at 6 months

    6 months

  • Minutes per day spent in at least moderate intense activities

    6 months and 12 months

  • Mean walking time per day

    6 months and 12 months

  • Mean sedentary time per day

    6 months and 12 months

  • Exercise capacity

    6 months and 12 months

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Type 1 tele coaching group

EXPERIMENTAL

Coaching with daily interaction with the coaching application, based on a adaptive physical activity goal

Behavioral: Type 1 physical activity tele coaching intervention

Type 2 tele coaching group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Coaching with fixed physical activity goal and limited interaction with the smartphone application

Behavioral: Type 2 physical activity tele coaching intervention

Interventions

A) Education about the importance of PA. During a one-to-one interview with the coach motivation, self-efficacy, barriers, favorite activities and strategies to become more active are discussed. B) Step counter providing direct feedback. C) A smartphone with a project-tailored application. The application provides automated coaching by displaying an activity goal (number of steps) and feedback on a daily basis. The feedback comes with a graphical presentation. Patients' targets are automatically revised weekly. The aim is to progressively increase the PA during the 12 weeks period and maintain afterwards. D) Telephone contacts triggered in the case of non-compliance with wearing the step counter, failure to transmit data, failure to progress or change in medication. Coaches are alerted by a note at the coaches' backend to take contact with the patient if needed.

Type 1 tele coaching group

A) Education about the importance of PA. During a one-to-one interview with the investigator, patients will receive a personal goal (expressed in steps/day), based on their individual exercise capacity. B) A step counter providing direct feedback. C) A smartphone with a project-tailored application. The application receives the step data of the patient and asks on a weekly basis about the patient's change in medication. The application does provide a graph showing the steps the patient took and presents a general activity plan including their personal goal (which stays the same throughout the entire intervention period). D) Telephone contacts triggered in the case of change in medication. Coaches are alerted by a note at the coaches' backend to take contact with the patient if needed.

Type 2 tele coaching group

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients diagnosed with COPD (GOLD criteria post bronchodilator FEV1/FVC \< 0.70)
  • Patients under medical follow-up of a respiratory physician or general practitioner with no moderate (ambulatory treated) and/or severe (requiring a hospital admission) exacerbation in the past month
  • Older than 40 years old
  • Smoking history with more than 10 pack years

You may not qualify if:

  • The presence of orthopedic or other problems not allowing an increase in physical activity levels
  • Unable to learn to work with a new electronic device (e.g. smartphone), as judged by the investigator
  • Underwent lung transplantation or active on the lung transplantation list
  • Involved in or planned to start with a structured multidisciplinary rehabilitation program

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

UZ Gent

Ghent, Belgium

Location

UZ Leuven

Leuven, 3000, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Blondeel A, Hermans F, Breuls S, Wuyts M, Everaerts S, De Maeyer N, Derom E, Janssens W, Demeyer H, Troosters T. A Long-Term Physical Activity Coaching Program for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Dec;211(12):2330-2339. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202501-0170OC.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Wim Janssens, Prof

    KU Leuven

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Heleen Demeyer, Dr

    KU Leuven

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Thierry Troosters, Prof

    KU Leuven

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Nikolaas De Maeyer, Dr

    UZ Leuven

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Astrid Blondeel

    KU Leuven

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Eric Derom, Prof.Dr.

    UZ Gent

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Fien Hermans

    U Gent

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Patients in the control group will receive a sham version of the smartphone application. Patients are unaware of the difference between the coaching programs.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 1:1 randomization
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2019

First Posted

October 25, 2019

Study Start

January 22, 2020

Primary Completion

December 11, 2023

Study Completion

December 11, 2023

Last Updated

January 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Locations