Assessing Effectiveness of Community Acquired Pneumonia Treatment by Continuous Pneumonia Severity Score
1 other identifier
interventional
2,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common respiratory infection and is the main cause of ICU admission and death in adults. Because of most patients were treated empirically against suspected causative microorganism, it is important to assess the effectiveness of treatment after 3 days of anti-infective therapy. However, the criteria for treatment failure is lack of a clear-cut and validated definition from the CAP guidelines. Pneumonia severity scores is a wide-used severity rating system for treatment selection and outcome prediction for CAP. So far, the pneumonia severity scores only used once before the treatment started. Considering the pneumonia severity scores could reflect the severity of pneumonia, it is reasonable to assume that the change of pneumonia severity scores could reflect the patients' condition and the effectiveness of the treatment. This trail will be designed to validate the feasibility of assessing effectiveness of CAP treatment by using continuous pneumonia severity score.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedOctober 22, 2019
October 1, 2019
2 years
October 17, 2019
October 20, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Rate of patients for ICU admission
Rate of patients who received ICU treatment during hospitalization. The numerator is the number of patients who received ICU treatment during hospitalization. The denominator is the number of all the enrolled patients.
through study completion, an average of 10 days
Rate of all-caused mortality within 30 days.
Rate of all-caused death occurring within 30 days during hospitalization. The numerator is the number of patients who defined as death occurring within 30 days of hospitalization. The denominator is the number of enrolled patients.
through study completion, an average of 10 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Length of stay for patients
through study completion, an average of 10 days
Study Arms (4)
Comprehensive evaluation group
EXPERIMENTALThe effectiveness of initial treatment and the next treatment plan were determined based on the CAP guidelines of Chinese Thoracic Society (CTS) or Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society(IDSA/ATS). The evaluation process was independently evaluated and documented by at least two clinicians. In case of disagreement, the final determination shall vote on the majority of votes.
PSI evaluation group
EXPERIMENTALThe changes of PSI scores and serum CRP were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. If both PSI scores and CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment will be maintained. If either of PSI scores or serum CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment can be maintained, but need to be reviewed in the next 3-5 days. If both PSI scores and serum CRP suggest that the treatment is failed, the initial treatment should be changed. The change of initial treatment is not limited to antibiotics, but also include using glucocorticoid, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation according to the patients' condition.
Expand-CURB evaluation group
EXPERIMENTALThe changes of Expand-CURB scores and serum CRP were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. If both Expand-CURB scores and CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment will be maintained. If either of Expand-CURB scores or serum CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment can be maintained, but need to be reviewed in the next 3-5 days. If both Expand-CURB scores and serum CRP suggest that the treatment is failed, the initial treatment should be changed. The change of initial treatment is not limited to antibiotics, but also include using glucocorticoid, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation according to the patients' condition.
Prospective observational group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients' Expand-CURB scores, PSI scores and serum CRP before and after 3-5 days of initial treatment will be recorded. And the initial treatment, whether the initial treatment was changed 3-5 days of initial treatment and the final outcomes (ICU admission, 30-day mortality, average length of stay) will be recorded.
Interventions
assessing effectiveness of CAP treatment by using continuous pneumonia severity score
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- community acquired pneumonia(by CTS or IDSA/ATS guidelines)
- severe community acquired pneumonia(PSI scores \>= 90 or Expand-CURB scores \>= 4);
You may not qualify if:
- HIV patients
- Other immunodeficiency disorders (neutropenia, hematologic and solid tumors undergoing chemoradiotherapy, organ transplantation, and long-term treatment with glucocorticoid and cytokine antagonists).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SAHZhejiangU
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China
Related Publications (4)
Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG; Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S27-72. doi: 10.1086/511159. No abstract available.
PMID: 17278083BACKGROUNDFine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, Coley CM, Marrie TJ, Kapoor WN. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 23;336(4):243-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701233360402.
PMID: 8995086BACKGROUNDLiu JL, Xu F, Zhou H, Wu XJ, Shi LX, Lu RQ, Farcomeni A, Venditti M, Zhao YL, Luo SY, Dong XJ, Falcone M. Expanded CURB-65: a new score system predicts severity of community-acquired pneumonia with superior efficiency. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 18;6:22911. doi: 10.1038/srep22911.
PMID: 26987602BACKGROUNDWelte T, Kohnlein T. Global and local epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia: the experience of the CAPNETZ Network. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;30(2):127-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1202941. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
PMID: 19296412BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The present study is a randomized controlled open label trial. Patients and their physicians know the group and the treatment plan, and there are clear criteria for the final outcome (30-day fatality rate, length of stay). The masking is not required.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2019
First Posted
October 22, 2019
Study Start
July 1, 2020
Primary Completion
June 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
October 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share