Antibiotic Loaded Bone Cement in Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
ALBA
1 other identifier
interventional
9,172
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction: The current evidence on the efficacy of Antibiotic Loaded Bone Cement (ALBC) in reducing the risk of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after primary joint reconstruction is insufficient. In several European countries, the use of ALBC is routine practice unlike in the US where ALBC use is not approved in low-risk patients. It has been claimed that the antibiotic in ALBC increase the risk of aseptic loosening, risk of systemic toxicity, allergic reaction, and bacterial resistance. Therefore we designed a double-blinded (patients and data analysts) pragmatic multicenter register-based randomized controlled non-inferiority trial to investigate the effects of ALBC compared to plain bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods and analysis: A minimum of 9,172 patients undergoing full-cemented primary TKA will be recruited and equally randomized into the ALBC group and the plain bone cement group. This trial will be conducted in Norwegian hospitals that routinely perform cemented primary TKA. . The primary outcome will be risk of revision surgery due to PJI at 1-year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be:
- risk of revision due to any reason including aseptic loosening at 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years of follow-up;
- patient related outcome measures (PROMs) like function, pain, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life at 1-, 6-, and 10-years of follow-up;
- risk of changes in the microbial pattern and resistance profiles of organisms cultured in subsequent revisions at 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years of follow-up; and
- cost-effectiveness of routine ALBC vs plain bone cement use in primary TKA. We will use 1:1 randomization with random permuted blocks and stratify by participating hospitals to randomize patients to receive ALBC or plain bone cement. Inclusion, randomization, and follow-up will be through the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Ethics and dissemination: The trial has been approved by the Western Norway Regional Committees on Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK-Vest) (reference number: 2019/751/REK vest) dated: 21.06.2019. The trial results will be reported following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Extension (CONSORT Extension) reporting guideline 2010 statement for non-inferiority trials. The trial results will be reported to the public through national and international scientific conferences, participating hospitals, patient organizations, and peer-reviewed journals. Discussion: If we find that plain bone cement is non-inferior to the ALBC, it will challenge the routine use of ALBC in primary arthroplasty, due to ecological concerns and costs. However, if routine use of ALBC is associated with a reduced risk of PJI and with minor impact on bacterial resistance, PROMs, and costs, the well-established use of prophylactic ALBC in primary arthroplasty will be supported
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jan 2021
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 14, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedJanuary 19, 2021
January 1, 2021
3 years
September 20, 2019
January 14, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
risk of revision due to PJI
1-year follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (6)
risk of revision due to any reason including aseptic loosening
1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years follow-up
risk of changes in the microbial pattern and resistance profiles of organisms cultured in subsequent revisions
1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years follow-up
Change in mean scores from baseline function (in activity of daily life) on the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).
1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
Change in mean scores from baselinein in Visual Analog Sale (the scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the worst possible state and 100 indicating the best possible state) for pain.
1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
Change in mean scores from baseline in EQ-5D-5L for health related quality of life(HRQoL).
1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Plain bone cement
EXPERIMENTALAntibiotic loaded bone cement
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The patients undergoing full-cemented primary total knee arthroplasty are allocated to either ALBC or plain bone cement and compare the effectiveness of ALBC use vs pain bone cement bone cement without antibiotic) with respect to revision due to PJI one year after primary TKA surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all patients undergoing full-cemented primary TKA irrespective of the diagnosis leading to TKA
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Norwegian Arthroplasty Registerlead
- Helse Vestcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Orthopeadic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Norway
Related Publications (1)
Leta TH, Gjertsen JE, Dale H, Hallan G, Lygre SHL, Fenstad AM, Dyrhovden GS, Westberg M, Wik TS, Jakobsen RB, Aamodt A, Rohrl SM, Gothesen OJ, Lindalen E, Heir S, Ludvigsen J, Bruun T, Hansen AK, Aune KEM, Warholm M, Skjetne JP, Badawy M, Hovding P, Husby OS, Karlsen OE, Furnes O. Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement in Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Register-based Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial (ALBA trial). BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):e041096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041096.
PMID: 33509845DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ove Furnes, MD/PhD
The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This is a double blinded, non-inferiority register-based multicenter randomized controlled trial study. To ensure blinding of the patients, all patients are operated by the same surgical method and the type of cement is unknown to the patients. In this study, blinding of the surgeon is not possible because the surgeon recognizes the cement type and has to document the type of cement in the registration form. We believe the primary endpoint of this trial is not likely to be influenced by the surgeon knowledge of the cement used in the index surgery. The data analyst will be blinded for groups until the entire trial analysis has been completed to minimize the risk of bias that may be introduced during the statistical analysis because of the selective use and reporting of statistical tests.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor/ postdoc fellowship
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2019
First Posted
October 22, 2019
Study Start
January 14, 2021
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
January 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share