NCT04133389

Brief Summary

This study will test the effectiveness of a brief educational intervention that teaches youth that they can grow and change, known as "growth mindset." Similar growth mindset interventions have improved youths' well-being and academic skills, and reduced risk for depression. In this study, youths' depressive symptoms and well-being will be measured before the intervention and then again 4 months after the intervention to determine if the intervention had a positive impact for youth experiencing transitions (firs and last years of high school).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
576

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 15, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 17, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 21, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 6, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 6, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 3, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

October 17, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 2, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Growth mindsetImplicit theoryAdolescenceMental HealthWell-beingstudentsSecondary SchoolsEducational intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Depressive symptoms

    Score on the Beck Depression Inventory-II. The BDI-II consists of 21 items using a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, however the current study will use only 19 items. The item querying suicidal ideation will be removed, as this may be triggering, and researchers would not be able to follow up with those who would highly endorse this item. The item querying sexual interest will be removed, as this may not be equally applicable across the sample. Scores on each item are summed to determine summary scores from 0-57. Higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    4 months (Oct 2019 - Feb 2020)

  • Perceived happiness

    score on the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS). This measure consists of four items measured on a 7-point Likert scale; responses are averaged to create a summary score (minimum=1, maximum=7) and higher scores reflect higher levels of subjective happiness.

    4 months (Oct 2019 - Feb 2020)

  • Life satisfaction

    score on the Brief Multidimensional Student Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS). The BMSLSS includes five items that assess global life satisfaction as a reflection of five life domains: family, school, friends, self, and living environment. The BMSLSS uses a 7-point Likert scale that ranges from delighted to terrible. The score of each item will be averaged to create a single score (minimum=1, maximum=7) such that higher scores represent higher levels of life satisfaction.

    4 months (Oct 2019 - Feb 2020)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Implicit theory of personality

    immediately post administration of the intervention

  • Implicit theory of a person (general)

    Immediately post administration of the intervention

  • Implicit theory of personality

    4 months (Oct 2019 - Feb 2020)

  • Implicit theory of a person (general)

    4 months (Oct 2019 - Feb 2020)

Study Arms (2)

Growth Mindset of Personality

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental intervention

Other: Growth mindset of personality educational intervention

Growth Mindset of Athletic Ability

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Control intervention

Other: Growth mindset of athletic ability educational intervention

Interventions

This is a brief online educational intervention that teaches growth mindset of personality. The intervention includes pictures, text, videos, and questions administered through Qualtrics survey software.

Growth Mindset of Personality

This is a brief online educational intervention that teaches growth mindset of athletic ability. The intervention includes pictures, text, videos, and questions administered through Qualtrics survey software.

Growth Mindset of Athletic Ability

Eligibility Criteria

Age13 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • A student at one of the recruited schools in grade 9 or 12
  • Age 13-18 years
  • Able to read and write fluently in English
  • Have parent/guardian consent, and provide participant consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Not a registered student at one of the recruited schools
  • Less than 13 or more than 18 years old
  • Unable to read and write fluently in English
  • Does not have parent/guardian consent or does not consent to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Guelph

Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Abela, J. R. Z., & Hankin, B. L. (2008). Depression in children and adolescents: Causes, treatment, and prevention. In J. R. Z. Abela & B. L. Hankin (Eds.), Handbook of depression in children and adolescents (pp. 3-5). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.

    BACKGROUND
  • Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological review, 96(2), 358.

    BACKGROUND
  • Abramson LY, Seligman ME, Teasdale JD. Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. J Abnorm Psychol. 1978 Feb;87(1):49-74. No abstract available.

    PMID: 649856BACKGROUND
  • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological inquiry, 6(4), 267-285.

    BACKGROUND
  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological review, 95(2), 256.

    BACKGROUND
  • Furlong, M. J., Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2014). Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools, 2nd Ed New York. NY: Taylor & Francis.

    BACKGROUND
  • Greenberg MT, Weissberg RP, O'Brien MU, Zins JE, Fredericks L, Resnik H, Elias MJ. Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. Am Psychol. 2003 Jun-Jul;58(6-7):466-74. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.6-7.466.

    PMID: 12971193BACKGROUND
  • Hankin BL, Abramson LY, Moffitt TE, Silva PA, McGee R, Angell KE. Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: emerging gender differences in a 10-year longitudinal study. J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Feb;107(1):128-40. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.107.1.128.

    PMID: 9505045BACKGROUND
  • Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 77(3), 588.

    BACKGROUND
  • Masten, A., Herbers, J., Cutuli, J., & Lafavor, T. (2008). Promoting competence and resilience in the school context. Professional School Counseling, 12(2), 76-84.

    BACKGROUND
  • Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M, Swanson SA, Avenevoli S, Cui L, Benjet C, Georgiades K, Swendsen J. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication--Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;49(10):980-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017. Epub 2010 Jul 31.

    PMID: 20855043BACKGROUND
  • Petersen AC, Compas BE, Brooks-Gunn J, Stemmler M, Ey S, Grant KE. Depression in adolescence. Am Psychol. 1993 Feb;48(2):155-68. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.48.2.155.

    PMID: 8442570BACKGROUND
  • Rindfuss RR. The young adult years: diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography. 1991 Nov;28(4):493-512. No abstract available.

    PMID: 1769399BACKGROUND
  • Seligman, M. E., Ernst, R. M., Gillham, J., Reivich, K., & Linkins, M. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford review of education, 35(3), 293-311.

    BACKGROUND
  • Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational psychologist, 47(4), 302-314.

    BACKGROUND
  • Blackwell LS, Trzesniewski KH, Dweck CS. Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Dev. 2007 Jan-Feb;78(1):246-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x.

  • Burnette JL, Russell MV, Hoyt CL, Orvidas K, Widman L. An online growth mindset intervention in a sample of rural adolescent girls. Br J Educ Psychol. 2018 Sep;88(3):428-445. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12192. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

  • Miu, A. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Preventing symptoms of depression by teaching adolescents that people can change: Effects of a brief incremental theory of personality intervention at 9-month follow-up. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(5), 726-743.

    RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DepressionPersonal SatisfactionPsychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Margaret Lumley, PhD

    University of Guelph

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Participants will not be informed that there are different versions of the educational program and thus will be blind to group allocation. Randomization will be fully automated by the online intervention administration system such that researchers will also be blind to group allocation during intervention administration as well as during pre- and post-intervention data collection. Because randomization is automated, neither researchers nor participants will be able to predict randomization assignments. Outcomes will be measured quantitatively thus no assessment of primary outcomes will take place. However, assessors of the manipulation check (which codes for participant engagement in the intervention) will not be masked and thus will be aware of allocation (experimental or control).
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The current study is a two-wave randomized controlled trial that employs a 2 (group - between participants) by 2 (time - within participants) mixed measures design to assess a brief online implicit theory of personality intervention.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2019

First Posted

October 21, 2019

Study Start

October 15, 2019

Primary Completion

March 6, 2020

Study Completion

March 6, 2020

Last Updated

April 3, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to share individual participant data as this has not been approved by our Research Ethics Board

Locations