Acute Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department Treated With Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Versus NSAIDs
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Compared to Ibuprofen for the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
174
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute low back pain is the fifth most common presenting complaint to the emergency department, accounting for approximately 4.4% of annual visits. The treatment for acute low back pain is often NSAIDs or other analgesic medications. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) has been shown to be an effective treatment modality for acute low back pain, however, it's use in the emergency department setting is not well described. The adjunct of OMT has the potential to increase patient satisfaction, decrease length of stay and decrease the number of unnecessary prescription medications. We plan to investigate the use of OMT in the setting of acute complaints of low back pain in comparison to the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as primary treatment modality. The study will be a non-blinded randomized-control trial and will take place in an academic tertiary care center in urban Philadelphia, PA over an approximate one-year timespan. We will utilize osteopathic-trained attending and resident physicians to perform the manipulation. Patients will be randomized into one of three treatment groups: appropriately dosed NSAID therapy alone, OMT in addition to NSAID therapy, or OMT alone. The primary outcome will be the difference in pain score before and after treatment using a VAS scale. Secondary outcomes will include patient and physician satisfaction immediately following treatment. Results will be shared by means of publication to the osteopathic and allopathic communities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 low-back-pain
Started Feb 2020
Typical duration for phase_4 low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 19, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedNovember 7, 2022
November 1, 2022
2.9 years
October 11, 2019
November 2, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain score
Difference in pain score before and after treatment using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scale (minimum 1, maximum 10, 10 being the worst)
45 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient Satisfaction
45 minutes
Physician Satisfaction
45 minutes
Study Arms (3)
NSAID
ACTIVE COMPARATORIbuprofen, 800 mg, one time dose
OMT/NSAID
ACTIVE COMPARATORIbuprofen, 800 mg, one time dose
OMT alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORlow velocity osteopathic manipulative medicine
Interventions
Low velocity osteopathic manipulative treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients 18 years of age or older with the chief complaint of acute low back pain defined as symptom duration no longer than four weeks prior to ED presentation and having clinical findings of somatic dysfunction (muscle edema, erythema, bogginess, hypertonic muscles, asymmetry of tissue, pain with movement, severe/sharp tenderness).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded if they previously participated in the study, history of gastrointestinal bleed, allergies to NSAIDs, NSAID use 4 hours prior to arrival, history of or concern for spinal column fracture, current diagnosis of active malignancy or metastatic cancer, open skin wounds at the treatment location site, patients with neurological deficits related to acute back pain, pregnant women, individuals unable to take oral medications, temperature \>38C, prisoners, those unable to consent, subjects under police custody, nursing home residents, non-English speaking patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
AEHN
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19147, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Joseph Herres, DO
Einstein Healthcare Network
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Megan Stobart-Gallagher, DO
Einstein Healthcare Network
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Attending Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2019
First Posted
October 16, 2019
Study Start
February 19, 2020
Primary Completion
January 1, 2023
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
November 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11