Study Stopped
no sufficient enrolled pateints
Platelet-rich Plasma Injection for Temporomandibular Disorders
Six-month Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Injection for Temporomandibular Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) involves the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and surrounding structure, causing problems including myofascial pain and joint degeneration. TMD is mostly seen in the age group of 18 to 44. TMD treatment includes conservative (non-surgical) and surgical treatment. Surgical TMD treatment has a decent success rate but requires general anesthesia, hospital stay and surgical incision. There are also some risks of facial nerve and vascular damage, infection, puncture to middle cranial fossa. Conservative treatments include medication , physical therapy, use of occlusal splint, hyaluronic acid (HA) or Botulinum toxin injection and concentrated glucose solution. However, those managements lack the evidence from large placebo-controlled clinical trials. Therefore, the development of novel non-surgical treatment is important and of great potential. The ultrasound guidance provides visualization of the lesion site, allowing the operator to provide injection precisely and avoid damage on adjacent tissue, nerves and vessels. it is not only convenient and economic, but also associated with significantly less radiation exposure than conventional techniques such as computer tomography or fluoroscopy. Using ultrasound guidance in injective TMD treatment can increase successful rate and prevent unnecessary side effects. While current available evidences suggest the promising effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection therapy in treating TMD, publication of study with strict design is still lacking. Therefore, this study is a randomized, controlled and double-blind design, which aimed to access the efficacy of ultrasound-guided PRP injection therapy of TMD, with normal saline used as control. Looking forward to establish TMD clinical treatment guideline in the future.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Nov 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2020
CompletedApril 27, 2020
April 1, 2020
6 months
April 22, 2019
April 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the degree of pain
\*. Visual Analogue Scale of the degree of pain: with the score ranging from 10 (tremendous pain) to 0 (no pain).
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
measure of maximal interincisal opening and painless mouth opening
6 months
measure of maximal mandibular excursion and protrusion.
6 months
Visual Analogue Scale of masticatory efficiency
6 months
Visual Analogue Scale of perceived joint noise
6 months
Study Arms (2)
platelet-rich plasma injection
EXPERIMENTAL1cc platelet-rich plasma(PRP) injection in the superior temporomandibular disk joint space by ultrasound guidance.
normal saline injection
PLACEBO COMPARATOR1cc normal saline injection in the superior temporomandibular disk joint space by ultrasound guidance.
Interventions
The administer injected 1cc PRP in the superior temporomandibular disk joint space by ultrasound guidance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 20-80 year-old.
- Duration of symptoms ( temporomandibular joint pain or tenderness, joint noise or joint motility dysfunction)more than 3 months.
- Diagnosis was confirmed by using the original Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and the severity at least Grade II.
You may not qualify if:
- Head and neck cancer
- Neurological disease
- Cognition impairment
- Coagulopathy
- Pregnancy
- Inflammation status
- Infection status
- Previously undergone wrist surgery or steroid injection for TMD
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
Cooper BC, Kleinberg I. Examination of a large patient population for the presence of symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders. Cranio. 2007 Apr;25(2):114-26. doi: 10.1179/crn.2007.018.
PMID: 17508632BACKGROUNDGencer ZK, Ozkiris M, Okur A, Korkmaz M, Saydam L. A comparative study on the impact of intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid, tenoxicam and betametazon on the relief of temporomandibular joint disorder complaints. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;42(7):1117-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.041. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
PMID: 24853591BACKGROUNDMartins WR, Blasczyk JC, Aparecida Furlan de Oliveira M, Lagoa Goncalves KF, Bonini-Rocha AC, Dugailly PM, de Oliveira RJ. Efficacy of musculoskeletal manual approach in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Man Ther. 2016 Feb;21:10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
PMID: 26144684BACKGROUNDKummoona R. Surgical managements of subluxation and dislocation of the temporomandibular joint: clinical and experimental studies. J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Nov;21(6):1692-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f3c682.
PMID: 21119402BACKGROUNDSivri MB, Ozkan Y, Pekiner FN, Gocmen G. Comparison of ultrasound-guided and conventional arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;54(6):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
PMID: 27118616BACKGROUNDFernandez-Ferro M, Fernandez-Sanroman J, Blanco-Carrion A, Costas-Lopez A, Lopez-Betancourt A, Arenaz-Bua J, Stavaru Marinescu B. Comparison of intra-articular injection of plasma rich in growth factors versus hyaluronic acid following arthroscopy in the treatment of temporomandibular dysfunction: A randomised prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;45(4):449-454. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
PMID: 28237253BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Liang-Cheng Chen, MD,MS
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor of Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2019
First Posted
October 16, 2019
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 30, 2020
Study Completion
April 30, 2020
Last Updated
April 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share