Safety and Efficacy of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Headache in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
VANQUISH
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a single site, randomized, sham-controlled, double blinded pilot study assessing the feasibility, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of non-invasive VNS (nVNS), gammaCore, in the treatment of headache in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). 40 participants will be enrolled, 20 in the active device arm and 20 in the sham arm. The primary efficacy outcome is the the difference between the active and sham treatment groups in morphine equivalence dosage.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 9, 2024
CompletedJanuary 9, 2024
January 1, 2024
2.4 years
September 13, 2019
July 6, 2023
January 6, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The Difference Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups in Morphine Equivalence Dosage PER DAY
Daily morphine equivalence dosage will be calculated and compared between the active and Sham group
up to 14 days of admission
Overall Difference in MED at 7 Days
difference in mean morphine equivalent dosage at 7 days between active and sham group
baseline and 7 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The Difference Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups in the Mean Daily Headache Intensity Pre and Post Stimulation
up to 14 days of admission
The Difference in Device Related Heart Rate Change Before and After Stimulation
up to 14 days of admission
Change in SBP Between Active and Sham Group
before and after stimulation, up to 14 days
Study Arms (2)
Sham arm
SHAM COMPARATORgammaCore sham device which will not provide stimulation of the vagus nerve
Treatment group
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive gammaCore device that supplies non-invasive stimulation of the cervical branch of the Vagus nerve
Interventions
The intervention consists of a transcutaneous non-invasive stimulation of the cervical branch of the vagus nerve (nVNS) using gammaCore, an FDA approved device for the treatment of migraine and cluster headache. This will be compared to the sham device, which is the same device which will not provide stimulation to the nerve. Stimulation frequency will be identical to the frequency used in previous nVNS studies for the treatment of migraine headache.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Established signed and dated informed consent form
- CT of the head revealing blood in the subarachnoid space
- Subject is male or female, 18 to 80 years of age
- Subject alert to be able to verbalize pain level. If alertness improves after placement of an external ventricular drain, or once extubated, and the patient becomes alert , the patient will be enrolled
- Subject reports pain of \> =7 on 10 Point Pain numeric rating scale
- Female of reproductive age must have a negative pregnancy test (Urine or blood test)
You may not qualify if:
- Use of any concomitant electrostimulation devices (Pacemaker, defibrillator, deep brain stimulation.)
- Unsecured aneurysm defined as aneurysm that has not been surgically or endovascularly treated.
- Previous carotid surgeries or known history of carotid artery disease
- Screws, metals or device in the neck
- History of secondary or tertiary heart blocks, ventricular tachycardia, Supra-Ventricular Tachycardia (including atrial fibrillation)
- Alcoholics (CAGE scale of 2 or greater). If patients are on Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA) protocol for alcohol withdrawal, the patient will be excluded from the study.
- Drug addicts or chronic opioid users confirmed by history or with urine toxicology showing opiates or cocaine
- small traumatic SAH
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwell Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
Northshore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States
Related Publications (15)
Magalhaes JE, Azevedo-Filho HR, Rocha-Filho PA. The risk of headache attributed to surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a cohort study. Headache. 2013 Nov-Dec;53(10):1613-23. doi: 10.1111/head.12165. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
PMID: 23808965BACKGROUNDRumalla K, Smith KA, Arnold PM, Mittal MK. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Readmissions: National Rates, Causes, Risk Factors, and Outcomes in 16,001 Hospitalized Patients. World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;110:e100-e111. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.089. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
PMID: 29107164BACKGROUNDGlisic EK, Gardiner L, Josti L, Dermanelian E, Ridel S, Dziodzio J, McCrum B, Enos B, Lerwick P, Fraser GL, Muscat P, Riker RR, Ecker R, Florman J, Seder DB. Inadequacy of Headache Management After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Am J Crit Care. 2016 Mar;25(2):136-43. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2016486.
PMID: 26932915BACKGROUNDMorad AH, Tamargo RJ, Gottschalk A. The Longitudinal Course of Pain and Analgesic Therapy Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Cohort Study. Headache. 2016 Nov;56(10):1617-1625. doi: 10.1111/head.12908. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
PMID: 27704534BACKGROUNDDorhout Mees SM, Bertens D, van der Worp HB, Rinkel GJ, van den Bergh WM. Magnesium and headache after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 May;81(5):490-3. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.181404. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
PMID: 19828484BACKGROUNDOshinsky ML, Murphy AL, Hekierski H Jr, Cooper M, Simon BJ. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation as treatment for trigeminal allodynia. Pain. 2014 May;155(5):1037-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
PMID: 24530613BACKGROUNDAkerman S, Simon B, Romero-Reyes M. Vagus nerve stimulation suppresses acute noxious activation of trigeminocervical neurons in animal models of primary headache. Neurobiol Dis. 2017 Jun;102:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
PMID: 28286178BACKGROUNDFrangos E, Komisaruk BR. Access to Vagal Projections via Cutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Neck: fMRI Evidence in Healthy Humans. Brain Stimul. 2017 Jan-Feb;10(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
PMID: 28104084BACKGROUNDBosche B, Graf R, Ernestus RI, Dohmen C, Reithmeier T, Brinker G, Strong AJ, Dreier JP, Woitzik J; Members of the Cooperative Study of Brain Injury Depolarizations (COSBID). Recurrent spreading depolarizations after subarachnoid hemorrhage decreases oxygen availability in human cerebral cortex. Ann Neurol. 2010 May;67(5):607-17. doi: 10.1002/ana.21943.
PMID: 20437558BACKGROUNDChen SP, Ay I, Lopes de Morais A, Qin T, Zheng Y, Sadeghian H, Oka F, Simon B, Eikermann-Haerter K, Ayata C. Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cortical spreading depression. Pain. 2016 Apr;157(4):797-805. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000437.
PMID: 26645547BACKGROUNDPavlov VA, Wang H, Czura CJ, Friedman SG, Tracey KJ. The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway: a missing link in neuroimmunomodulation. Mol Med. 2003 May-Aug;9(5-8):125-34.
PMID: 14571320BACKGROUNDSuzuki T, Takizawa T, Kamio Y, Qin T, Hashimoto T, Fujii Y, Murayama Y, Patel AB, Ayata C. Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation Prevents Ruptures and Improves Outcomes in a Model of Intracranial Aneurysm in Mice. Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1216-1223. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023928.
PMID: 30943885BACKGROUNDGeorge MS, Ward HE Jr, Ninan PT, Pollack M, Nahas Z, Anderson B, Kose S, Howland RH, Goodman WK, Ballenger JC. A pilot study of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant anxiety disorders. Brain Stimul. 2008 Apr;1(2):112-21. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
PMID: 20633378BACKGROUNDBreit S, Kupferberg A, Rogler G, Hasler G. Vagus Nerve as Modulator of the Brain-Gut Axis in Psychiatric and Inflammatory Disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Mar 13;9:44. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00044. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29593576BACKGROUNDLendvai IS, Maier A, Scheele D, Hurlemann R, Kinfe TM. Spotlight on cervical vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of primary headache disorders: a review. J Pain Res. 2018 Aug 27;11:1613-1625. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S129202. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30214271BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- northwell health
- Organization
- northwell health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2019
First Posted
October 15, 2019
Study Start
January 13, 2020
Primary Completion
June 20, 2022
Study Completion
June 20, 2022
Last Updated
January 9, 2024
Results First Posted
January 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share