Study Stopped
Recruitment difficulties (low accrual)
Predicting the Success of Dry Eye Disease Interventions Using Clinical Tests
PreDICT
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a single site, prospective, cross-sectional, controlled clinical study on a total of 66 subjects. The subjects are divided into two groups: Hypertonic Saline Non-Responders (33 subjects) and Hypertonic Saline Responders (33 subjects). After completion of questionnaires, the subjects will undergo Dry Eye Disease testing and functional nerve testing. Subjects who qualify will be dispensed 4 weeks of preservative free artificial tears and instructed to instill one drop into each eye twice daily. Subjects will return for a follow up visit 4 weeks later (± 4 days), during which subjects will complete the questionnaires again and the Dry Eye Disease tests and functional nerve tests will be repeated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Oct 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 11, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2025
CompletedSeptember 22, 2025
September 1, 2025
5 years
October 9, 2019
September 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in SANDE severity score response from visit 1 to visit 2
The SANDE questionnaire is a paper and pencil questionnaire consisting of two questions (1. severity of dry eye disease symptoms and 2. frequency of dry eye disease symptoms), which are answered on a continuous visual analogue scale. The severity response from visit 2 will be subtracted from that given in visit 1 to provide a subject change. The results of those in the hypertonic saline response group will be compared to those within the hypertonic non-response group.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in tear break up time from visit 1 to visit 2
4 weeks
Change in Schirmer test from visit 1 to visit 2
4 weeks
Change in meibomian gland expression from visit 1 to visit 2
4 weeks
Change in proparacaine challenge test from visit 1 to visit 2
4 weeks
Change in hypertonic saline response test from visit 1 to visit 2
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Hypertonic Saline Responders
EXPERIMENTALSubjects who qualify as hypertonic saline responders will be instructed to instill 1-2 drops of preservative-free Refresh Optive Advanced Lubricant Eye Drops, which are available over the counter, into each eye twice a day for 28 days.
Hypertonic Saline Non-responders
EXPERIMENTALSubjects who qualify as hypertonic saline non-responders will be dispensed the same instructions and treatment as the Hypertonic Saline Responders. They will be instructed to instill 1-2 drops of preservative-free Refresh Optive Advanced Lubricant Eye Drops, which are available over the counter, into each eye twice a day for 28 days.
Interventions
over the counter artificial tear
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Group 1 (Hypertonic saline non-responders):
- At least 18 years of age
- Ability to consent
- Diagnosis of Dry Eye Disease (DED) based on:
- Symptoms of DED, shown with SANDE score of 50mm or greater
- Two or more of the following objective signs in the same eye: 1. Schirmer test of 10 mm or less over 5 minutes; 2. Fluorescein tear break-up time (FTBUT) of 7 seconds or less; 3. Meibomian gland expression (MGE) grade of 2 or greater for at least 3 out of 5 glands
- HS response result of one of the following:
- Reduction of discomfort/pain rating
- No change of discomfort/pain rating
- Increase in discomfort/pain rating score of 1 step or less
- Group 2 (Hypertonic saline non-responders):
- At least 18 years of age
- Ability to consent
- Diagnosis of DED based on:
- Symptoms of DED, shown with SANDE score 50mm or greater
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of centralized pain as indicated by a proparacaine challenge test (PCT) of less than 50% ocular surface discomfort reduction
- Unable to speak English
- History of ocular surgery, corneal infection, or corneal injury within the last 3 months
- Active ocular allergies or other condition that could impact the study results
- Allergic to benzalkonium chloride "BAK" (an eye-drop preservative)
- Changes in topical or systemic medications in the last 3 months or anticipated changes in medication during the course of treatment
- Use of other topical treatments
- Concurrent enrollment in other studies that in the opinion of the investigator will interfere with the results of this study
- Use of contact lenses within the last month
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tufts Medical Center-New England Eye Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
Related Publications (18)
Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
PMID: 28736335BACKGROUNDBelmonte C, Aracil A, Acosta MC, Luna C, Gallar J. Nerves and sensations from the eye surface. Ocul Surf. 2004 Oct;2(4):248-53. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70112-x.
PMID: 17216099BACKGROUNDShaheen BS, Bakir M, Jain S. Corneal nerves in health and disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014 May-Jun;59(3):263-85. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.09.002. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
PMID: 24461367BACKGROUNDOliveira-Soto L, Efron N. Morphology of corneal nerves using confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2001 May;20(4):374-84. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200105000-00008.
PMID: 11333324BACKGROUNDTepelus TC, Chiu GB, Huang J, Huang P, Sadda SR, Irvine J, Lee OL. Correlation between corneal innervation and inflammation evaluated with confocal microscopy and symptomatology in patients with dry eye syndromes: a preliminary study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep;255(9):1771-1778. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3680-3. Epub 2017 May 20.
PMID: 28528377BACKGROUNDLabbe A, Liang Q, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Xu L, Baudouin C, Sun X. Corneal nerve structure and function in patients with non-sjogren dry eye: clinical correlations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Aug 1;54(8):5144-50. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12370.
PMID: 23833066BACKGROUNDVillani E, Magnani F, Viola F, Santaniello A, Scorza R, Nucci P, Ratiglia R. In vivo confocal evaluation of the ocular surface morpho-functional unit in dry eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Jun;90(6):576-86. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318294c184.
PMID: 23670123BACKGROUNDLabbe A, Alalwani H, Van Went C, Brasnu E, Georgescu D, Baudouin C. The relationship between subbasal nerve morphology and corneal sensation in ocular surface disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 24;53(8):4926-31. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8708.
PMID: 22695962BACKGROUNDBenitez-Del-Castillo JM, Acosta MC, Wassfi MA, Diaz-Valle D, Gegundez JA, Fernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J. Relation between corneal innervation with confocal microscopy and corneal sensitivity with noncontact esthesiometry in patients with dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jan;48(1):173-81. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0127.
PMID: 17197530BACKGROUNDKheirkhah A, Dohlman TH, Amparo F, Arnoldner MA, Jamali A, Hamrah P, Dana R. Effects of corneal nerve density on the response to treatment in dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):662-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
PMID: 25542519BACKGROUNDMandahl A. Hypertonic saline test for ophthalmic nerve impairment. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1993 Aug;71(4):556-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1993.tb04636.x.
PMID: 8249592BACKGROUNDRahman M, Okamoto K, Thompson R, Bereiter DA. Trigeminal pathways for hypertonic saline- and light-evoked corneal reflexes. Neuroscience. 2014 Sep 26;277:716-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.052. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
PMID: 25086311BACKGROUNDYorek MS, Davidson EP, Poolman P, Coppey LJ, Obrosov A, Holmes A, Kardon RH, Yorek MA. Corneal Sensitivity to Hyperosmolar Eye Drops: A Novel Behavioral Assay to Assess Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 May 1;57(6):2412-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19435.
PMID: 27145474BACKGROUNDParra A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez O, Gallar J, Belmonte C. Tear fluid hyperosmolality increases nerve impulse activity of cold thermoreceptor endings of the cornea. Pain. 2014 Aug;155(8):1481-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.025. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
PMID: 24785271BACKGROUNDNichols KK, Bacharach J, Holland E, Kislan T, Shettle L, Lunacsek O, Lennert B, Burk C, Patel V. Impact of Dry Eye Disease on Work Productivity, and Patients' Satisfaction With Over-the-Counter Dry Eye Treatments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jun 1;57(7):2975-82. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19419.
PMID: 27273596BACKGROUNDSchiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 May;118(5):615-21. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.5.615.
PMID: 10815152BACKGROUNDQazi Y, Hurwitz S, Khan S, Jurkunas UV, Dana R, Hamrah P. Validity and Reliability of a Novel Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) in Quantifying and Monitoring Corneal and Ocular Surface Pain. Ophthalmology. 2016 Jul;123(7):1458-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
PMID: 27089999BACKGROUNDSchaumberg DA, Gulati A, Mathers WD, Clinch T, Lemp MA, Nelson JD, Foulks GN, Dana R. Development and validation of a short global dry eye symptom index. Ocul Surf. 2007 Jan;5(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70053-8.
PMID: 17252166BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephanie Cox, OD
Tufts Medical Center New England Eye Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2019
First Posted
October 14, 2019
Study Start
October 3, 2019
Primary Completion
October 11, 2024
Study Completion
July 31, 2025
Last Updated
September 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share