CLOSE-guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using High Power and Stable RF Applications
POWERAF
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded,monocentric study, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of higher power CLOSE-guided PVI in patients referred for a first ablation for paroxysmal AF. We aim to include 100 patients into two groups (1:1). The experimental group will receive AF ablation with 45 Watt and stricter stability criteria (3 mm for 3 seconds) compared to the control group which will receive AF ablation according to the standard CLOSE-protocol (35 Watt and stability criteria of 3 mm for 8 seconds).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2020
CompletedFebruary 12, 2021
February 1, 2021
7 months
October 9, 2019
February 10, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Efficacy: Acute procedural success
First pass pulmonary vein isolation confirmed after adenosine injection
At time of ablation
Safety: Absence of clinical complications
Absence of clinical complications during the procedure and up to one month thereafter
From time of ablation to 1 month post procedure
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Procedural duration time
At time of ablation
Duration for pulmonary vein isolation
At time of ablation
Fluoroscopic duration and irradiation (AK)
At time of ablation
Amount of ablation points associated with temperature rise
At time of ablation
Maximum temperature in case of temperature rise
At time of ablation
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
High power group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe experimental group will receive AF ablation with 45 Watt and stricter stability criteria (3 mm for 3 seconds).
Standard group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group will receive AF ablation according to the standard CLOSE-protocol (35 Watt and stability criteria of 3 mm for 8 seconds)
Interventions
CLOSE-guided PVI ablation with 45 Watt and stricter stability criteria (3 mm for 3 seconds)
Standard AF ablation according to the CLOSE-protocol
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients referred for symptomatic paroxysmal AF and without advanced structural heart disease
- Signed Patient Informed Consent Form
- Age 18 years or older
- Able and willing to comply with all follow-up testing and requirements
You may not qualify if:
- Persistent atrial fibrillation (history of AF\>7days or history of cardioversion \> 48h of AF)
- Previous ablation for AF
- LA antero-posterior diameter\>50 mm (parasternal long axis view , PLAX)
- LVEF \<35% (ejection fraction)
- AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or reversible or non-cardiac cause
- CABG procedure within the last three months
- Awaiting cardiac transplantation or other cardiac surgery
- Documented left atrial thrombus on imaging
- Diagnosed atrial myxoma
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
- Acute illness or active systemic infection or sepsis
- Unstable angina
- Uncontrolled heart failure
- Myocardial infarction within the previous two months
- History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AZ Sint-Jan AVlead
Study Sites (1)
Department of Cardiology
Bruges, 8000, Belgium
Related Publications (1)
Wielandts JY, Kyriakopoulou M, Almorad A, Hilfiker G, Strisciuglio T, Phlips T, El Haddad M, Lycke M, Unger P, Le Polain de Waroux JB, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Duytschaever M, Knecht S. Prospective Randomized Evaluation of High Power During CLOSE-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The POWER-AF Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Jan;14(1):e009112. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009112. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
PMID: 33300809RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2019
First Posted
October 10, 2019
Study Start
February 15, 2019
Primary Completion
September 25, 2019
Study Completion
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
February 12, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02