Effects of Mucosave® on Gastrointestinal Discomfort
Clinical Study on the Effects of the Product Mucosave® on Gastrointestinal Discomfort and the Quality of Life in Healthy Volunteers
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort, which often includes gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder in healthy adults affecting 20% of people particularly women. The disorders related to GI discomfort usually have a huge impact on the quality of life. Current treatment for GERD are associated with side effects. In this study, researchers designed a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to assess the effect of Mucosave® on the symptoms and quality of life of healthy adults with gastrointestinal discomfort. One hundred healthy subjects with GI discomfort were enrolled in the study and divided in two groups: 60 and 40 taking for 8 weeks Mucosave® (400 mg/day) or placebo (400 mg/day). To evaluate the effects of treatment, the questionnaires Gastrointestinal Quality of Life index (GIQLI) and GERD Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS) were self-administered by participants before the beginning of period of supplementation (T0), after four weeks (T4) during the period of supplementation and after 8 weeks (T8) at the end of supplementation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 9, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2019
CompletedFebruary 5, 2020
January 1, 2020
3 months
September 19, 2019
February 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of relief of gastrointestinal disorders with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) questionnaire.
The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) questionnaire contains questions on gastrointestinal symptoms, each with 5 answers in the "Likert scale" style (technique for measuring the attitude), according to the meaning "higher score, better quality of life". The GIQLI is an appropriate, validated and potentially useful tool to assess health-related quality of life in clinical studies of patients with gastrointestinal disease. Each of the 36 items is scored on a five-point scale (0 to 4) denoting the burden of the particular symptom or dysfunction. The total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 144 (best quality of life) with higher scores representing better quality of life. Subscales can be summarized or averaged.
8 weeks
Evaluation of relief of gastrointestinal symptoms with the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS): an evaluation scale of gastrointestinal symptoms.
GSAS is a 15-item tool designed to evaluate various aspects including stress about gastrointestinal symptoms before and after treatments. GSAS is a self-administered questionnaire that asks patients to report about the previous week for 15 specific symptoms: heartburn, a feeling of pressure inside chest, food coming back into mouth, an acid in mouth, frequent gurgling, feeling of lump in throat, nausea, burning pain in throat, bloating, belching, flatulence, feeling full after eating, bad breath, coughing, and hoarseness. Scoring of the GSAS distress subscale is based on the presence of the symptoms and their bother ratings. Specifically, patients first indicate whether they had the symptom in the past week. If they did not have the symptom, their score for the symptom is 0. If they did have the symptom, they then report how bothered they were by it on a 4-point scale (0 ? not at all, 1 ? somewhat, 2 ? quite a bit, 3 ? very much). Subscales can be summarized or averaged.
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Satisfaction of supplementation.
15 days
Intestinal microbiota investigation on stool samples
8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Mucosave® capsules
EXPERIMENTAL60 healthy volunteers taking 400 mg/day of Mucosave® capsules for a period of 8 weeks, once a day after dinner before going to bed.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOR40 healthy volunteers taking capsules of placebo for a period of 8 weeks, once a day after dinner before going to bed.
Interventions
400 mg/day of Mucosave® capsules for a period of 8 weeks, once a day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy men and women aged between 30 and 50 years;
- subjects able to read, to understand and to sign approval of informed consent;
- subjects not using food supplements for gastro-intestinal well-being;
- subjects available to continue own habitual diet;
- subjects without diagnosis of clinical diseases with relevant effects on the gastrointestinal system or visceral motility;
- subjects with reduced bowel movements defined as an average of \> 1 and ≤ 3.5 stools per week in the last 6 months;
- subjects with BMI = 18-30 kg/m2;
- non-smoker subjects.
You may not qualify if:
- history of gastroesophageal surgery or endoscopic therapy due to severe erosive esophagitis;
- presence of Barrett's esophagus;
- subjects with uncontrolled or severe medical problems such as asthma, angina, hepatic or kidney diseases;
- subjects aged \< 30 or \> 50 years;
- presence of acute or chronic inflammatory processes requiring therapy;
- presence of acute or chronic coexisting diseases (cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, endocrinological, immunological, metabolic or any other condition that contraindicates, in the opinion of the investigators, the participation to the study);
- subjects taking drugs that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the objectives of the study or represent a safety risk or can confuse the interpretation of the study results including heartburn medication, probiotics and prebiotics;
- subjects that, in the opinion of the investigator, can be considered as potential participants, but for whatever reason are not able to respect the protocol of the study;
- pregnant or nursing women;
- subjects who cannot receive treatment with experimental drugs; subject participating in a recent experimental study (this must have been performed no less than 30 days prior to this study);
- subjects affected by neoplasms.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gioacchino Calapai
Messina, Me, 98125, Italy
Related Publications (17)
Buchwald-Werner S, Fujii H, Reule C, Schoen C. Perilla extract improves gastrointestinal discomfort in a randomized placebo controlled double blind human pilot study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 May 27;14:173. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-173.
PMID: 24885816BACKGROUNDSalehi M, Karegar-Borzi H, Karimi M, Rahimi R. Medicinal Plants for Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Review of Animal and Human Studies. J Altern Complement Med. 2017 Feb;23(2):82-95. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0233. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
PMID: 27996295BACKGROUNDPanahi Y, Khedmat H, Valizadegan G, Mohtashami R, Sahebkar A. Efficacy and safety of Aloe vera syrup for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a pilot randomized positive-controlled trial. J Tradit Chin Med. 2015 Dec;35(6):632-6. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(15)30151-5.
PMID: 26742306BACKGROUNDEnck P, Dubois D, Marquis P. Quality of life in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms: results from the Domestic/International Gastroenterology Surveillance Study (DIGEST). Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1999;231:48-54. doi: 10.1080/003655299750025264.
PMID: 10565623BACKGROUNDAlecci U, Bonina F, Bonina A, Rizza L, Inferrera S, Mannucci C, Calapai G. Efficacy and Safety of a Natural Remedy for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Double-Blinded Randomized-Controlled Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:2581461. doi: 10.1155/2016/2581461. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
PMID: 27818697BACKGROUNDEl-Serag H, Becher A, Jones R. Systematic review: persistent reflux symptoms on proton pump inhibitor therapy in primary care and community studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Sep;32(6):720-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04406.x.
PMID: 20662774BACKGROUNDDi Lorenzo F, Silipo A, Molinaro A, Parrilli M, Schiraldi C, D'Agostino A, Izzo E, Rizza L, Bonina A, Bonina F, Lanzetta R. The polysaccharide and low molecular weight components of Opuntia ficus indica cladodes: Structure and skin repairing properties. Carbohydr Polym. 2017 Feb 10;157:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.073. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
PMID: 27987833BACKGROUNDGalati EM, Mondello MR, D'Aquino A, Miceli N, Sanogo R, Tzakou O, Monforte MT. Effects of Teucrium divaricatum Heldr. ssp. divaricatum decoction on experimental ulcer in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000 Sep;72(1-2):337-42. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(00)00280-4.
PMID: 10967492BACKGROUNDTrombetta D, Saija A, Bisignano G, Arena S, Caruso S, Mazzanti G, Uccella N, Castelli F. Study on the mechanisms of the antibacterial action of some plant alpha,beta-unsaturated aldehydes. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2002;35(4):285-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2002.01190.x.
PMID: 12358689BACKGROUNDDekanski D, Janicijevic-Hudomal S, Ristic S, Radonjic NV, Petronijevic ND, Piperski V, Mitrovic DM. Attenuation of cold restraint stress-induced gastric lesions by an olive leaf extract. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2009;28 Spec No:135-42.
PMID: 19893091BACKGROUNDEl SN, Karakaya S. Olive tree (Olea europaea) leaves: potential beneficial effects on human health. Nutr Rev. 2009 Nov;67(11):632-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00248.x.
PMID: 19906250BACKGROUNDEypasch E, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Ure B, Neugebauer E, Troidl H. [The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index. A clinical index for measuring patient status in gastroenterologic surgery]. Chirurg. 1993 Apr;64(4):264-74. German.
PMID: 8482141BACKGROUNDRevicki DA, Wood M, Wiklund I, Crawley J. Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Qual Life Res. 1998 Jan;7(1):75-83. doi: 10.1023/a:1008841022998.
PMID: 9481153BACKGROUNDBorgaonkar MR, Irvine EJ. Quality of life measurement in gastrointestinal and liver disorders. Gut. 2000 Sep;47(3):444-54. doi: 10.1136/gut.47.3.444.
PMID: 10940286BACKGROUNDDamiano A, Handley K, Adler E, Siddique R, Bhattacharyja A. Measuring symptom distress and health-related quality of life in clinical trials of gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: further validation of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS). Dig Dis Sci. 2002 Jul;47(7):1530-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1015815102175.
PMID: 12141813BACKGROUNDFass R. Symptom assessment tools for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007 May-Jun;41(5):437-44. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31802e849f.
PMID: 17450022BACKGROUNDDupont HL. Review article: evidence for the role of gut microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome and its potential influence on therapeutic targets. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 May;39(10):1033-42. doi: 10.1111/apt.12728. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
PMID: 24665829BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gioacchino Calapai, MD
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria "G Martino", Messina, Italy.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2019
First Posted
October 8, 2019
Study Start
February 9, 2019
Primary Completion
May 22, 2019
Study Completion
July 22, 2019
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share