NCT04119180

Brief Summary

There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of moderate sedation in pediatric dentistry, compared to protective stabilization, which remains routinely used in the Brazilian context despite moral questions. The objective of this prospective nonrandomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of moderate sedation, compared to the protective stabilization, in the dental care of children with fear / anxiety and / or dental behavior problem, and associated factors. The study will be carried out in outpatient clinics of the Dental Schools of the Federal University of Goiás (UFG) and University of São Paulo (USP), with the support of professors from King's College London through the partnership CEDACORE - Children Experiencing Dental Anxiety: Collaboration on Research and Education. Participants will be 152 children under 7 years of age with dental caries, who need specialized dental treatment due to a history of non-cooperation with dental care. The interventions to be compared are moderate sedation with oral administration of ketamine and midazolam (UFG) and protective stabilization (USP). The primary endpoint 'behavior / anxiety of the child during treatment will be assessed using the Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale. The secondary outcomes are: dental behavioral and anxiety evolution of the child, child' pain during procedure, impact on the quality of life related to oral health, parents and dentists' satisfaction and stress, adverse events for sedated participants, longevity of composite and glass ionomer cement restorations, chronotype and physiological stress of these children. A cost-efficacy analysis will be produced at the end of the study from the perspective of the Sistema Único de Saúde. Additionally, at the end of 36 months, the investigators expect to contribute to the identification of psychosocial aspects related to dental behavior problems in children in early childhood. It is important to highlight the perspective of technological innovation, with the creation of a digital platform that will allow the registration of data related to the dental care of children worldwide and favor analyzes in the methodology of data science.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
152

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 1, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 8, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 30, 2020

Completed
5.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

December 10, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5.1 years

First QC Date

October 1, 2019

Last Update Submit

December 7, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Dental AnxietyDental CariesConscious SedationPhysical RestraintCost-Efficacy Analysis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Child behavior during the dental treatment

    Children's behavior assessed by OSUBRS (Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale) in digital videos recorded during the administration. Scores: 1 - quiet, 2 - cry with movement, 3 - movement without cry; 4 - struggling. The higher the percentage of time of care in which the child behaves quietly, the better their behavior. Measurements for each group will be synthesized as mean (or median) and standard deviation (or interquartile range).

    Participants will be followed for the duration of the dental session, an expected average of 40 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Progression of child behavior throughout the follow-up

    Baseline (dental examination) plus follow-up sessions at 4, 8, and 12 months post-treatment

  • Progression of child dental anxiety throughout the follow-up

    Baseline (dental examination) plus follow-up sessions at 4, 8, and 12 months post-treatment

  • Impact on oral health-related quality of life and changes after treatment

    Baseline (dental examination) plus follow-up sessions at 4, 8, and 12 months post-treatment

  • Parental satisfaction with the intervention

    At the end of each session from dental examination through the end of the dental treatment, an average of 2 months

  • Parental stress (anxiety) with the intervention

    At the end of each session from dental examination through the end of the dental treatment, an average of 2 months

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Sedation

EXPERIMENTAL

The child receives sedatives approved for use in an outpatient setting, directed by a doctor, to accomplish the dental treatment.

Drug: Ketamine 50 MG/MLDrug: Midazolam Hcl 2Mg/Ml Syrup

Control

OTHER

The child does not receive sedatives. As s/he exhibits negative behavior for the dental procedure, s/he will be restrained by a family member and dental team.

Procedure: Protective stabilization

Interventions

Ketamine injectable solution in a concentration of 50.0 mg/mL via oral route; dose of 4.0 mg/kg maximum 100.0 mg

Also known as: Ketamin S, Cristalia, São Paulo, Brazil
Sedation

Midazolam oral solution in a concentration of 2.0 mg/mL via oral route; dose of 0.5 mg/kg, maximum 5.0 mg when associated with ketamine;

Also known as: Dormire oral solution, Cristalia, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Sedation

The legal guardian or accompanying person appointed by the legal guardian should sit in the dental chair with the child and contain leg and arm movements. A dental assistant keeps the child's head contained during care.

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 7 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children presenting cavities that need dental restoration
  • ASA I (healthy) or II (mild and controlled systemic disease - persistent asthma, for example) children (ASA, 2015)
  • Medical history without neurological or cognitive impairment
  • Children who do not use medicines that may impair cognitive functions
  • Children at low risk for airway obstruction (Mallampati less than 2 and / or tonsil hypertrophy occupying less than 50% of the oropharynx) (Mallampati et al., 1985)

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with positive or definitely positive behavior (Frankl et al. 1962) in the dental examination session
  • Non-attendance at the first intervention appointment after three scheduling attempts
  • Chronic use of systemic corticosteroids

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Dental School - UFG

Goiânia, Goiás, 74605220, Brazil

ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING

Dental School - FOUSP

São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • da Silva GS, Anabuki AA, Viana KA, Correa-Faria P, Moterane MM, Tedesco TK, Costa PS, Hosey MT, Raggio DP, Costa LR; CEDACORE Collaborative Group. Sedation versus protective stabilization for dental treatment of children with caries and challenging behavior at the dentist (CHOOSE): a study protocol for a non-randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 12;21(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01594-0.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Child BehaviorDental Caries

Interventions

KetamineMidazolam

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BehaviorTooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CyclohexanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsBenzodiazepinesBenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Luciane RS Costa, PhD

    Universidade Federal de Goias

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Daniela P Raggio, PhD

    University of Sao Paulo

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Patricia C Faria, PhD

    Universidade Federal de Goias

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Patricia C Faria, PhD

CONTACT

Luciane R Costa, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2019

First Posted

October 8, 2019

Study Start

January 30, 2020

Primary Completion

February 28, 2025

Study Completion

February 28, 2026

Last Updated

December 10, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All IPD that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
2023 to 2024
Access Criteria
According to the digital platform rules.

Available IPD Datasets

Study Protocol Access

Locations