Sedation Versus Protective Stabilization for Pediatric Dental Treatment
2 other identifiers
interventional
152
1 country
2
Brief Summary
There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of moderate sedation in pediatric dentistry, compared to protective stabilization, which remains routinely used in the Brazilian context despite moral questions. The objective of this prospective nonrandomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of moderate sedation, compared to the protective stabilization, in the dental care of children with fear / anxiety and / or dental behavior problem, and associated factors. The study will be carried out in outpatient clinics of the Dental Schools of the Federal University of Goiás (UFG) and University of São Paulo (USP), with the support of professors from King's College London through the partnership CEDACORE - Children Experiencing Dental Anxiety: Collaboration on Research and Education. Participants will be 152 children under 7 years of age with dental caries, who need specialized dental treatment due to a history of non-cooperation with dental care. The interventions to be compared are moderate sedation with oral administration of ketamine and midazolam (UFG) and protective stabilization (USP). The primary endpoint 'behavior / anxiety of the child during treatment will be assessed using the Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale. The secondary outcomes are: dental behavioral and anxiety evolution of the child, child' pain during procedure, impact on the quality of life related to oral health, parents and dentists' satisfaction and stress, adverse events for sedated participants, longevity of composite and glass ionomer cement restorations, chronotype and physiological stress of these children. A cost-efficacy analysis will be produced at the end of the study from the perspective of the Sistema Único de Saúde. Additionally, at the end of 36 months, the investigators expect to contribute to the identification of psychosocial aspects related to dental behavior problems in children in early childhood. It is important to highlight the perspective of technological innovation, with the creation of a digital platform that will allow the registration of data related to the dental care of children worldwide and favor analyzes in the methodology of data science.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2026
CompletedDecember 10, 2024
December 1, 2024
5.1 years
October 1, 2019
December 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Child behavior during the dental treatment
Children's behavior assessed by OSUBRS (Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale) in digital videos recorded during the administration. Scores: 1 - quiet, 2 - cry with movement, 3 - movement without cry; 4 - struggling. The higher the percentage of time of care in which the child behaves quietly, the better their behavior. Measurements for each group will be synthesized as mean (or median) and standard deviation (or interquartile range).
Participants will be followed for the duration of the dental session, an expected average of 40 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Progression of child behavior throughout the follow-up
Baseline (dental examination) plus follow-up sessions at 4, 8, and 12 months post-treatment
Progression of child dental anxiety throughout the follow-up
Baseline (dental examination) plus follow-up sessions at 4, 8, and 12 months post-treatment
Impact on oral health-related quality of life and changes after treatment
Baseline (dental examination) plus follow-up sessions at 4, 8, and 12 months post-treatment
Parental satisfaction with the intervention
At the end of each session from dental examination through the end of the dental treatment, an average of 2 months
Parental stress (anxiety) with the intervention
At the end of each session from dental examination through the end of the dental treatment, an average of 2 months
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Sedation
EXPERIMENTALThe child receives sedatives approved for use in an outpatient setting, directed by a doctor, to accomplish the dental treatment.
Control
OTHERThe child does not receive sedatives. As s/he exhibits negative behavior for the dental procedure, s/he will be restrained by a family member and dental team.
Interventions
Ketamine injectable solution in a concentration of 50.0 mg/mL via oral route; dose of 4.0 mg/kg maximum 100.0 mg
Midazolam oral solution in a concentration of 2.0 mg/mL via oral route; dose of 0.5 mg/kg, maximum 5.0 mg when associated with ketamine;
The legal guardian or accompanying person appointed by the legal guardian should sit in the dental chair with the child and contain leg and arm movements. A dental assistant keeps the child's head contained during care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children presenting cavities that need dental restoration
- ASA I (healthy) or II (mild and controlled systemic disease - persistent asthma, for example) children (ASA, 2015)
- Medical history without neurological or cognitive impairment
- Children who do not use medicines that may impair cognitive functions
- Children at low risk for airway obstruction (Mallampati less than 2 and / or tonsil hypertrophy occupying less than 50% of the oropharynx) (Mallampati et al., 1985)
You may not qualify if:
- Children with positive or definitely positive behavior (Frankl et al. 1962) in the dental examination session
- Non-attendance at the first intervention appointment after three scheduling attempts
- Chronic use of systemic corticosteroids
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universidade Federal de Goiaslead
- University of Sao Paulocollaborator
- King's College Londoncollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Dental School - UFG
Goiânia, Goiás, 74605220, Brazil
Dental School - FOUSP
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil
Related Publications (1)
da Silva GS, Anabuki AA, Viana KA, Correa-Faria P, Moterane MM, Tedesco TK, Costa PS, Hosey MT, Raggio DP, Costa LR; CEDACORE Collaborative Group. Sedation versus protective stabilization for dental treatment of children with caries and challenging behavior at the dentist (CHOOSE): a study protocol for a non-randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 12;21(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01594-0.
PMID: 33980232DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luciane RS Costa, PhD
Universidade Federal de Goias
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Daniela P Raggio, PhD
University of Sao Paulo
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patricia C Faria, PhD
Universidade Federal de Goias
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2019
First Posted
October 8, 2019
Study Start
January 30, 2020
Primary Completion
February 28, 2025
Study Completion
February 28, 2026
Last Updated
December 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- 2023 to 2024
- Access Criteria
- According to the digital platform rules.
All IPD that underlie results in a publication