Acute Pain Rate of Single Versus Two-visit Root Canal Treatment of Teeth With Necrotic Pulps
Acute pain
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Aim to compare acute pain rate after single-visit ortwo-visits treatment of teeth with necrotic pulp and apical periodontitis .90 teeth with a diagnosis of pulp necrosis and apical radiolucency at the apex.Working length was established with EAL and confirmed radiographically. Flex-R files were used to complete canal preparation. Level ofdiscomfort were recorded and cases with acute postoperative pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Feb 2018
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2019
CompletedOctober 4, 2019
October 1, 2019
8 months
October 2, 2019
October 3, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity measure with general pain scale
Each patient will recall a week to evaluate post operative pain
a week
Study Arms (2)
Post-endodontic Pain after a RCT
EXPERIMENTALIbuprofen for Post operative pain. Take 400 mg takena week after. Incidence of flare ups after a single vsmultiple visits root canal treatments.
Acute pain
EXPERIMENTALAcetaminophen 325 mg for Acute pain. Taken secondday after. Incidence of Post operative pain after rootcanal treatment in one vs two visits
Interventions
All treatment sessions were approximately 45 minutes in length to allow for acceptable time for completionof treatment and retreatment in one or two visits. Allthe clinical procedures were performed by the author.Following local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine with1:100,000 epinephrine (Septodont Saint-Maur desFossés, France) and rubber dam isolation the toothwas disinfected with 5.25% NaOCl (Ultra bleach,Bentonville, AR, USA).
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Jorge Paredes Vieyra
Tijuana, Baja Califronia, 22000, Mexico
Jorge Paredes Vieyra
Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, 22000, Mexico
Jose Clemente Orozco
Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, 22000, Mexico
Jose Clemente
Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, 22000, Mexico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- compare Incidence of acute painafter single-visit ortwo-visits treatment of teeth with necrotic pulp
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Jorge Paredes Vieyra DDS, MsC, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2019
First Posted
October 4, 2019
Study Start
February 8, 2018
Primary Completion
September 29, 2018
Study Completion
September 28, 2019
Last Updated
October 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Acute pain rate
- Access Criteria
- Evaluate the acute pain rate
Each participant will be evaluated a week after the treatment