NCT04113525

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate if two courses of five consecutive sessions of noninvasive spinal stimulation paired with peripheral nerve stimulation at the forearm provided by an investigational device (Doublestim™/ MyoRegulator™ System - PathMaker Neurosystems Inc.) are able to improve wrist stiffness and motor function, when combined with intensive robotic wrist training program in participants with chronic spastic hemiparesis after stroke.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
13

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 24, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 2, 2019

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 15, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 14, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

September 25, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Stroke RehabilitationNeuromodulationTranscutaneous Spinal Direct Current StimulationRobotic TherapyTranscutaneous Peripheral Direct Current StimulationSpasticityHemiparesis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Instrumental assessment of change in wrist muscle tone

    As primary outcome measure, the team will investigate whether Doublestim™ intervention paired with robotic therapy significantly changes the catch response during wrist extension as recorded by a biomechanical force transducer.

    Change from baseline (Admission) at discharge (D-A) and at Four week Follow-up (FU-A)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in upper extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment

    Change from baseline (Admission) at discharge (D-A) and at Four week Follow-up (FU-A)

Study Arms (2)

Active Stimulation + Robotic Wrist Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Two courses of five consecutive days of 20 minute trans-spinal and trans-peripheral nerve active stimulation (total of 10 sessions) combined with a six-week intensive wrist robotic training program.

Device: MyoRegulator™ System

Sham Stimulation + Robotic Wrist Therapy

SHAM COMPARATOR

Two courses of five consecutive days of 20 minute trans-spinal and trans-peripheral nerve sham stimulation (total of 10 sessions) combined with a six-week intensive wrist robotic training program.

Device: MyoRegulator™ System

Interventions

Paired transcutaneous spinal and peripheral nerve stimulation

Also known as: Doublestim™
Active Stimulation + Robotic Wrist TherapySham Stimulation + Robotic Wrist Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • First and only single focal unilateral hemisphere lesion with diagnosis verified by brain imaging (MRI or CT scans) that occurred at least 6 months prior
  • Cognitive function sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions (per interview with PI or study investigators)
  • Fugl-Meyer assessment (minimum score of 12 out of 66 - not completely plegic in the muscles of affected wrist)
  • A Modified Ashworth score between 1-3 points for wrist flexors and extensors
  • A minimum of 15 degrees wrist passive ROM for wrist flexion and extension from wrist neutral position
  • Body fat range of 15-25mm for females/10-20mm for males of adipose tissue at the cervical neck level and a body fat range of 10-40mm for females/5-35mm for males of adipose tissue at the suprailiac crest, as determined by a body fat caliper

You may not qualify if:

  • Botox or phenol alcohol treatment of the upper extremity within 3 months of stimulation intervention
  • Fixed contracture or complete flaccid paralysis of the affected wrist
  • Introduction of any new rehabilitation interventions during study
  • Pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant or breastfeeding during the study period as determined by self-report
  • Focal brainstem or thalamic infarcts
  • Prior surgical treatments for spasticity of the upper limb
  • Ongoing use of CNS-active medications for spasticity (enrollment to be determined by PI review)
  • History of spinal cord injury or weakness
  • Chronic pain, defined by a report of a "5" or greater on the Wong-Baker Pain Scale
  • Peripheral neuropathy including insulin dependent diabetes as determined by case history
  • Presence of additional potential tsDCS risk factors:
  • Damaged skin at the site of stimulation (i.e., skin with ingrown hairs, acne, razor nicks, wounds that have not healed recent scar tissue, broken skin, etc.)
  • Presence of an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implant (including cardiac pacemaker), an intracerebral vascular clip, or any other electrically sensitive support system; Loop recorders will be reviewed on a case by case basis by PI and the treating Cardiologist to make a determination
  • Highly conductive metal in any part of the body, including metal injury to the eye (jewelry must be removed during stimulation); this will be reviewed on a case by case basis for PI to make a determination
  • Past history of seizures or unexplained spells of loss of consciousness during the previous 36 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Feinstein Institutes For Medical Research - Northwell Health

Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 21;352(16):1677-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp043511.

    PMID: 15843670BACKGROUND
  • Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Epub 2016 May 4.

    PMID: 27145936BACKGROUND
  • Volpe BT, Huerta PT, Zipse JL, Rykman A, Edwards D, Dipietro L, Hogan N, Krebs HI. Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2009 Sep;66(9):1086-90. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.182.

    PMID: 19752297BACKGROUND
  • Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Bever CT Jr, Bravata DM, Duncan PW, Corn BH, Maffucci AD, Nadeau SE, Conroy SS, Powell JM, Huang GD, Peduzzi P. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1772-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341. Epub 2010 Apr 16.

    PMID: 20400552BACKGROUND
  • Ahmed Z. Trans-spinal direct current stimulation modulates motor cortex-induced muscle contraction in mice. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 May;110(5):1414-24. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01390.2010. Epub 2011 Feb 24.

    PMID: 21350028BACKGROUND
  • Ahmed Z. Trans-spinal direct current stimulation alters muscle tone in mice with and without spinal cord injury with spasticity. J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29;34(5):1701-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4445-13.2014.

    PMID: 24478352BACKGROUND
  • Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996 Jun 21;272(5269):1791-4. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5269.1791.

    PMID: 8650578BACKGROUND
  • Bocci T, Vannini B, Torzini A, Mazzatenta A, Vergari M, Cogiamanian F, Priori A, Sartucci F. Cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) improves motor unit recruitment in healthy subjects. Neurosci Lett. 2014 Aug 22;578:75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.037. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

    PMID: 24970753BACKGROUND
  • Lance JW. The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert Wartenberg Lecture. Neurology. 1980 Dec;30(12):1303-13. doi: 10.1212/wnl.30.12.1303. No abstract available.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeHemiplegiaParesisMuscle Spasticity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParalysisNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular Manifestations

Study Officials

  • Bruce T Volpe, MD

    The Feinstein Institutes For Medical Research - Northwell Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2019

First Posted

October 2, 2019

Study Start

September 24, 2019

Primary Completion

February 15, 2022

Study Completion

February 15, 2022

Last Updated

April 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2021-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No plans.

Locations