Study Stopped
company went bankrupt, covid closed clinical research facility
Transcutaneous Spinal and Peripheral Stimulation and Wrist Robotic Therapy for Patients With Spastic Stroke
The Effect of Treatment With the Doublestim™ Neuromodulation System Incorporating Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation Paired With Robotic Therapy in Patients With Wrist Spasticity After Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate if two courses of five consecutive sessions of noninvasive spinal stimulation paired with peripheral nerve stimulation at the forearm provided by an investigational device (Doublestim™/ MyoRegulator™ System - PathMaker Neurosystems Inc.) are able to improve wrist stiffness and motor function, when combined with intensive robotic wrist training program in participants with chronic spastic hemiparesis after stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2022
CompletedApril 14, 2022
September 1, 2021
2.4 years
September 25, 2019
April 7, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Instrumental assessment of change in wrist muscle tone
As primary outcome measure, the team will investigate whether Doublestim™ intervention paired with robotic therapy significantly changes the catch response during wrist extension as recorded by a biomechanical force transducer.
Change from baseline (Admission) at discharge (D-A) and at Four week Follow-up (FU-A)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Changes in upper extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment
Change from baseline (Admission) at discharge (D-A) and at Four week Follow-up (FU-A)
Study Arms (2)
Active Stimulation + Robotic Wrist Therapy
EXPERIMENTALTwo courses of five consecutive days of 20 minute trans-spinal and trans-peripheral nerve active stimulation (total of 10 sessions) combined with a six-week intensive wrist robotic training program.
Sham Stimulation + Robotic Wrist Therapy
SHAM COMPARATORTwo courses of five consecutive days of 20 minute trans-spinal and trans-peripheral nerve sham stimulation (total of 10 sessions) combined with a six-week intensive wrist robotic training program.
Interventions
Paired transcutaneous spinal and peripheral nerve stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 years of age
- First and only single focal unilateral hemisphere lesion with diagnosis verified by brain imaging (MRI or CT scans) that occurred at least 6 months prior
- Cognitive function sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions (per interview with PI or study investigators)
- Fugl-Meyer assessment (minimum score of 12 out of 66 - not completely plegic in the muscles of affected wrist)
- A Modified Ashworth score between 1-3 points for wrist flexors and extensors
- A minimum of 15 degrees wrist passive ROM for wrist flexion and extension from wrist neutral position
- Body fat range of 15-25mm for females/10-20mm for males of adipose tissue at the cervical neck level and a body fat range of 10-40mm for females/5-35mm for males of adipose tissue at the suprailiac crest, as determined by a body fat caliper
You may not qualify if:
- Botox or phenol alcohol treatment of the upper extremity within 3 months of stimulation intervention
- Fixed contracture or complete flaccid paralysis of the affected wrist
- Introduction of any new rehabilitation interventions during study
- Pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant or breastfeeding during the study period as determined by self-report
- Focal brainstem or thalamic infarcts
- Prior surgical treatments for spasticity of the upper limb
- Ongoing use of CNS-active medications for spasticity (enrollment to be determined by PI review)
- History of spinal cord injury or weakness
- Chronic pain, defined by a report of a "5" or greater on the Wong-Baker Pain Scale
- Peripheral neuropathy including insulin dependent diabetes as determined by case history
- Presence of additional potential tsDCS risk factors:
- Damaged skin at the site of stimulation (i.e., skin with ingrown hairs, acne, razor nicks, wounds that have not healed recent scar tissue, broken skin, etc.)
- Presence of an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implant (including cardiac pacemaker), an intracerebral vascular clip, or any other electrically sensitive support system; Loop recorders will be reviewed on a case by case basis by PI and the treating Cardiologist to make a determination
- Highly conductive metal in any part of the body, including metal injury to the eye (jewelry must be removed during stimulation); this will be reviewed on a case by case basis for PI to make a determination
- Past history of seizures or unexplained spells of loss of consciousness during the previous 36 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwell Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
The Feinstein Institutes For Medical Research - Northwell Health
Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States
Related Publications (9)
Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 21;352(16):1677-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp043511.
PMID: 15843670BACKGROUNDWinstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Epub 2016 May 4.
PMID: 27145936BACKGROUNDVolpe BT, Huerta PT, Zipse JL, Rykman A, Edwards D, Dipietro L, Hogan N, Krebs HI. Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2009 Sep;66(9):1086-90. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.182.
PMID: 19752297BACKGROUNDLo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Bever CT Jr, Bravata DM, Duncan PW, Corn BH, Maffucci AD, Nadeau SE, Conroy SS, Powell JM, Huang GD, Peduzzi P. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1772-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341. Epub 2010 Apr 16.
PMID: 20400552BACKGROUNDAhmed Z. Trans-spinal direct current stimulation modulates motor cortex-induced muscle contraction in mice. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 May;110(5):1414-24. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01390.2010. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
PMID: 21350028BACKGROUNDAhmed Z. Trans-spinal direct current stimulation alters muscle tone in mice with and without spinal cord injury with spasticity. J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29;34(5):1701-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4445-13.2014.
PMID: 24478352BACKGROUNDNudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996 Jun 21;272(5269):1791-4. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5269.1791.
PMID: 8650578BACKGROUNDBocci T, Vannini B, Torzini A, Mazzatenta A, Vergari M, Cogiamanian F, Priori A, Sartucci F. Cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) improves motor unit recruitment in healthy subjects. Neurosci Lett. 2014 Aug 22;578:75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.037. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
PMID: 24970753BACKGROUNDLance JW. The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert Wartenberg Lecture. Neurology. 1980 Dec;30(12):1303-13. doi: 10.1212/wnl.30.12.1303. No abstract available.
PMID: 7192811RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bruce T Volpe, MD
The Feinstein Institutes For Medical Research - Northwell Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2019
First Posted
October 2, 2019
Study Start
September 24, 2019
Primary Completion
February 15, 2022
Study Completion
February 15, 2022
Last Updated
April 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plans.