NCT04109287

Brief Summary

The muscles of the leg require a regular supply of oxygen and nutrients. This is supplied by blood carried by a network of large blood vessels known as arteries. Gradually, these arteries can become narrowed or blocked by a build-up of fatty deposits. This process is known as atherosclerosis and leads to a condition called peripheral arterial disease. The restriction of blood flow caused by the blockage prevents exercising muscles getting enough oxygen and nutrients. In some people, this may lead to a painful ache in their legs when they walk, known as intermittent claudication. If the leg pain is severe, surgeons may decide to bypass this blockage using a vein taken from another part of the body, thereby improving blood flow to the foot. Patients with a narrowing or blockage anywhere in the main artery that runs from the groin to the back of the knee may be treated with a particular type of bypass graft known as a femoral-popliteal bypass graft. However, this graft may collapse if not enough blood is flowing through it. This study is looking to see whether a circulation booster machine, known as the REVITIVE® device, can improve the amount of blood flowing through femoral-popliteal bypass grafts. Patients with these grafts attending their usual clinic appointment in the Vascular Outpatients department at Charing Cross Hospital, London will be asked to have their leg scanned using an ultrasound machine to measure the amount of blood flowing through the graft. They will then use the REVITIVE® device for 30 minutes, before being re-scanned to see whether the device has improved blood flow. Improvements in blood flow may suggest a promising role for the device in keeping these grafts open, therefore helping them last longer and potentially reducing the leg pain associated with peripheral arterial disease.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 23, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 30, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 11, 2020

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 5, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 5, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 4, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

September 23, 2019

Last Update Submit

October 3, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Femoral-poplitealBypassGraftPADPVDNMESTime-averaged mean velocityVolume flow rateVolume flowTAMVVFRPeak systolic velocityPSVPeak velocityPVNeuromuscular electrical stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in time-averaged mean velocity (TAMV).

    Change in TAMV in femoral-popliteal bypass grafts after use of the NMES device.

    1 to 3 hours

  • Change in peak systolic velocity (PSV).

    Change in PSV in femoral-popliteal bypass grafts after use of the NMES device.

    1 to 3 hours

  • Change in volume flow rate (VFR).

    Change in VFR in femoral-popliteal bypass grafts after use of the NMES device.

    1 to 3 hours

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Intra-subject reliability measurements of time-averaged mean velocity (TAMV).

    1 to 3 hours

  • Intra-subject reliability measurements of peak systolic velocity (PSV).

    1 to 3 hours

  • Intra-subject reliability measurements of volume flow rate (VFR).

    1 to 3 hours

  • Inter-user reliability measurements of time-averaged mean velocity (TAMV).

    1 to 3 hours

  • Inter-user reliability measurements of peak systolic velocity (PSV).

    1 to 3 hours

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Two ultrasound scans and activation of NMES device

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will have their leg scanned using an ultrasound machine, before being asked to use the REVITIVE® device for 30 minutes. Their leg will then be scanned again.

Device: REVITIVE® device

Interventions

The REVITIVE® device applies neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the soles of the feet, causing the muscles of the leg to contract and relax, thus improving blood circulation through the legs.

Two ultrasound scans and activation of NMES device

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Have a confirmed diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD);
  • Have undergone revascularisation surgery via a vein femoral-popliteal bypass graft;
  • Are willing to participate and are able to provide written informed consent;
  • Are aged over 18 years;
  • Agree to attend at least one of their usual clinic appointments at the Vascular Outpatients department at Charing Cross Hospital, London before 13th April 2020 (project deadline for the student is Monday 11th May 2020);
  • Have a body mass index (BMI) between 17 and 30 kg/m2.

You may not qualify if:

  • Do not have a diagnosis of PAD;
  • Have not had revascularisation surgery;
  • Have had revascularisation surgery via an artificial femoral-popliteal bypass graft;
  • Are fitted with an electronic implanted device;
  • Are being treated for (or have symptoms of) a deep vein thrombosis (DVT);
  • Are pregnant.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Charing Cross Hospital

London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Williams KJ, Moore HM, Davies AH. Haemodynamic changes with the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation compared to intermittent pneumatic compression. Phlebology. 2015 Jun;30(5):365-72. doi: 10.1177/0268355514531255. Epub 2014 Apr 10.

    PMID: 24722790BACKGROUND
  • Varatharajan L, Williams K, Moore H, Davies AH. The effect of footplate neuromuscular electrical stimulation on venous and arterial haemodynamics. Phlebology. 2015 Oct;30(9):648-50. doi: 10.1177/0268355514542682. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

    PMID: 24997200BACKGROUND
  • Liu HI, Currier DP, Threlkeld AJ. Circulatory response of digital arteries associated with electrical stimulation of calf muscle in healthy subjects. Phys Ther. 1987 Mar;67(3):340-5. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.3.340.

    PMID: 2950528BACKGROUND
  • Ravikumar R, Williams KJ, Babber A, Lane TRA, Moore HM, Davies AH. Randomised Controlled Trial: Potential Benefit of a Footplate Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Device in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jan;53(1):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

    PMID: 27919609BACKGROUND
  • Delis KT, Knaggs AL, Sonecha TN, Zervas V, Jenkins MP, Wolfe JH. Lower limb venous haemodynamic impairment on dependency: quantification and implications for the "economy class" position. Thromb Haemost. 2004 May;91(5):941-50. doi: 10.1160/TH03-12-0754.

    PMID: 15116255BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial DiseasePeripheral Vascular Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AtherosclerosisArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Alun H Davies, FHEA FACPh

    Imperial College London

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: All participants will be scanned, asked to use the NMES device for 30 minutes and scanned again.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2019

First Posted

September 30, 2019

Study Start

February 11, 2020

Primary Completion

October 5, 2022

Study Completion

October 5, 2022

Last Updated

October 4, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data for the primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will be available within 6 months of study completion.
Access Criteria
Access requests will be reviewed by the PI.

Locations