Study Stopped
COVID-19
Blood Flow Changes in Femoral-popliteal Bypass Grafts After Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES).
HAEMUS
Haemodynamic Changes in Femoral-popliteal Bypass Grafts With the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The muscles of the leg require a regular supply of oxygen and nutrients. This is supplied by blood carried by a network of large blood vessels known as arteries. Gradually, these arteries can become narrowed or blocked by a build-up of fatty deposits. This process is known as atherosclerosis and leads to a condition called peripheral arterial disease. The restriction of blood flow caused by the blockage prevents exercising muscles getting enough oxygen and nutrients. In some people, this may lead to a painful ache in their legs when they walk, known as intermittent claudication. If the leg pain is severe, surgeons may decide to bypass this blockage using a vein taken from another part of the body, thereby improving blood flow to the foot. Patients with a narrowing or blockage anywhere in the main artery that runs from the groin to the back of the knee may be treated with a particular type of bypass graft known as a femoral-popliteal bypass graft. However, this graft may collapse if not enough blood is flowing through it. This study is looking to see whether a circulation booster machine, known as the REVITIVE® device, can improve the amount of blood flowing through femoral-popliteal bypass grafts. Patients with these grafts attending their usual clinic appointment in the Vascular Outpatients department at Charing Cross Hospital, London will be asked to have their leg scanned using an ultrasound machine to measure the amount of blood flowing through the graft. They will then use the REVITIVE® device for 30 minutes, before being re-scanned to see whether the device has improved blood flow. Improvements in blood flow may suggest a promising role for the device in keeping these grafts open, therefore helping them last longer and potentially reducing the leg pain associated with peripheral arterial disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Feb 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 11, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 5, 2022
CompletedOctober 4, 2023
October 1, 2023
2.6 years
September 23, 2019
October 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in time-averaged mean velocity (TAMV).
Change in TAMV in femoral-popliteal bypass grafts after use of the NMES device.
1 to 3 hours
Change in peak systolic velocity (PSV).
Change in PSV in femoral-popliteal bypass grafts after use of the NMES device.
1 to 3 hours
Change in volume flow rate (VFR).
Change in VFR in femoral-popliteal bypass grafts after use of the NMES device.
1 to 3 hours
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Intra-subject reliability measurements of time-averaged mean velocity (TAMV).
1 to 3 hours
Intra-subject reliability measurements of peak systolic velocity (PSV).
1 to 3 hours
Intra-subject reliability measurements of volume flow rate (VFR).
1 to 3 hours
Inter-user reliability measurements of time-averaged mean velocity (TAMV).
1 to 3 hours
Inter-user reliability measurements of peak systolic velocity (PSV).
1 to 3 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Two ultrasound scans and activation of NMES device
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will have their leg scanned using an ultrasound machine, before being asked to use the REVITIVE® device for 30 minutes. Their leg will then be scanned again.
Interventions
The REVITIVE® device applies neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the soles of the feet, causing the muscles of the leg to contract and relax, thus improving blood circulation through the legs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have a confirmed diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD);
- Have undergone revascularisation surgery via a vein femoral-popliteal bypass graft;
- Are willing to participate and are able to provide written informed consent;
- Are aged over 18 years;
- Agree to attend at least one of their usual clinic appointments at the Vascular Outpatients department at Charing Cross Hospital, London before 13th April 2020 (project deadline for the student is Monday 11th May 2020);
- Have a body mass index (BMI) between 17 and 30 kg/m2.
You may not qualify if:
- Do not have a diagnosis of PAD;
- Have not had revascularisation surgery;
- Have had revascularisation surgery via an artificial femoral-popliteal bypass graft;
- Are fitted with an electronic implanted device;
- Are being treated for (or have symptoms of) a deep vein thrombosis (DVT);
- Are pregnant.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Charing Cross Hospital
London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Williams KJ, Moore HM, Davies AH. Haemodynamic changes with the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation compared to intermittent pneumatic compression. Phlebology. 2015 Jun;30(5):365-72. doi: 10.1177/0268355514531255. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
PMID: 24722790BACKGROUNDVaratharajan L, Williams K, Moore H, Davies AH. The effect of footplate neuromuscular electrical stimulation on venous and arterial haemodynamics. Phlebology. 2015 Oct;30(9):648-50. doi: 10.1177/0268355514542682. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
PMID: 24997200BACKGROUNDLiu HI, Currier DP, Threlkeld AJ. Circulatory response of digital arteries associated with electrical stimulation of calf muscle in healthy subjects. Phys Ther. 1987 Mar;67(3):340-5. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.3.340.
PMID: 2950528BACKGROUNDRavikumar R, Williams KJ, Babber A, Lane TRA, Moore HM, Davies AH. Randomised Controlled Trial: Potential Benefit of a Footplate Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Device in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jan;53(1):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
PMID: 27919609BACKGROUNDDelis KT, Knaggs AL, Sonecha TN, Zervas V, Jenkins MP, Wolfe JH. Lower limb venous haemodynamic impairment on dependency: quantification and implications for the "economy class" position. Thromb Haemost. 2004 May;91(5):941-50. doi: 10.1160/TH03-12-0754.
PMID: 15116255BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alun H Davies, FHEA FACPh
Imperial College London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2019
First Posted
September 30, 2019
Study Start
February 11, 2020
Primary Completion
October 5, 2022
Study Completion
October 5, 2022
Last Updated
October 4, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available within 6 months of study completion.
- Access Criteria
- Access requests will be reviewed by the PI.
De-identified individual participant data for the primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.