Prevention of Residual Low Back Pain After Percutaneous Kyphosis(PKP) Using Posterior Branch Block of Spinal Nerve
1 other identifier
interventional
198
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to block the posterior branch of lumbar spinal nerve during PKP operation and compare it with the patients without spinal nerve block, so as to verify the effect of posterior branch block of spinal nerve in relieving short-term and long-term residual low back pain after operation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 24, 2020
CompletedOctober 27, 2020
October 1, 2020
1.1 years
September 21, 2019
October 24, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Residual low back pain after operation
Residual low back pain after operation using Visual analogue pain score(VAS) scale, VAS scores range from 0 to 10, more higher score means more severe pain, and residual back pain was defined as a VAS score greater than or equal to 4.
6 months after operation
Study Arms (2)
posterior branch block of spinal nerve
EXPERIMENTALposterior branch block of spinal nerve during Percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP)operation
without posterior branch block of spinal nerve
NO INTERVENTIONwithout posterior branch block of spinal nerve during Percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) operation
Interventions
posterior branch block of spinal nerve during Percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) operation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- osteoporotic fracture
- acute vertebral compression fracture (within 2 weeks)
- fracture level lower thanT6
You may not qualify if:
- other types of fractures
- patients younger than 60 years of age,
- with other disease (metabolic bone disease, metastasis, uncor- rectable coagulopathy, spinal infection, severe cardiopulmonary comorbidity, cognitive disorders etc)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, feykjkcy@163.com, China
Related Publications (1)
Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC, Venmans A, van Rooij WJ, Schoemaker MC, Juttmann JR, Lo TH, Verhaar HJ, van der Graaf Y, van Everdingen KJ, Muller AF, Elgersma OE, Halkema DR, Fransen H, Janssens X, Buskens E, Mali WP. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1085-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
PMID: 20701962RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Director of Spinal surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2019
First Posted
September 30, 2019
Study Start
September 1, 2019
Primary Completion
October 24, 2020
Study Completion
October 24, 2020
Last Updated
October 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share