Micronized Progesterone vs Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist in Freeze-all IVF Cycles.
Prog_STIM
Suppression of Endogenous Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Surge With Progesterone vs GnRH Antagonist in Freeze-all IVF Cycles. A Prospective Equivalence Study With Repeated Ovarian Stimulation Cycles.
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To examine whether the number of euploid embryos following ovarian stimulation with micronized progesterone is equivalent as compared with the number of embryos after ovarian stimulation with the use of a GnRH antagonist in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF or intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 27, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2022
CompletedMay 15, 2023
May 1, 2023
2.3 years
September 20, 2019
May 12, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of euploid embryos as compared between the 2 ovarian stimulation cycles
Number of euploid embryos between oocytes received from the antagonist GnRh protocol or the micronized progesterone protocol.
15-45 days following oocyte retrieval procedure
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Endocrine profile at specific intervals
Stimulation day 0, day 6, day 8, day of final oocyte maturation and day +1 after oocyte maturation (actual day may vary between 9-15)
Endocrine profile at specific intervals
Stimulation day 0, day 6, day 8, day of final oocyte maturation and day +1 after oocyte maturation (actual day may vary between 9-15)
Endocrine profile at specific intervals
Stimulation day 0, day 6, day 8, day of final oocyte maturation and day +1 after oocyte maturation (actual day may vary between 9-15)
Duration of stimulation
9-20 days from initiation of ovarian stimulation
Incidence of premature LH rise
9-20 days from initiation of ovarian stimulation
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
GnRH antagonist
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the antagonist cycle, LH suppression will be accomplished by subcutaneous (SC) injections of 0.25 mg of Cetrorelix or Ganirelix starting in the presence of follicles \>14mm or E2 levels \>400 pg/ml and continuing until ovulation triggering.
Micronized progesterone
EXPERIMENTALIn the progesterone cycle, endogenous LH suppression will be accomplished by oral administration of micronized progesterone (200 mg) once a day at bed time, from stimulation day 1 and continuing until ovulation triggering.
Interventions
In the antagonist cycle, LH suppression will be accomplished by subcutaneous (SC) injections of 0.25 mg of Cetrorelix or Ganirelix starting in the presence of follicles \>14mm or E2 levels \>400 pg/ml and continuing until ovulation triggering to avoid LH surge in COS
Micronized progesterone protocol to avoid LH surge in COS, from stimulation day 1 and continuing until ovulation triggering.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infertile patients
- Age 36-40 years old
- BMI 18-30 kg/m2
- Undergoing preimplantation genetic screening cycles
- Planned to undergo at least two treatment cycles, to accumulate embryos to increase the chance of obtaining euploid embryos for transfer
- Willing to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Age\> 41
- Severe male factor requiring TESE (testicular sperm extraction)
- Low ovarian reserve (AMH \< 1.2 ng/ml)
- Administration of any other drug potentially interfering with the treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fundacion Dexeuslead
Study Sites (1)
Institut Universitari Dexeus
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08028, Spain
Related Publications (12)
Zhang J, Mao X, Wang Y, Chen Q, Lu X, Hong Q, Kuang Y. Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after human menopausal gonadotropin and medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Dec;296(6):1207-1217. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4537-z. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
PMID: 28948397BACKGROUNDZhu X, Ye H, Fu Y. Use of Utrogestan during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in normally ovulating women undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatments in combination with a "freeze all" strategy: a randomized controlled dose-finding study of 100 mg versus 200 mg. Fertil Steril. 2017 Feb;107(2):379-386.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
PMID: 27865446BACKGROUNDZhu X, Zhang X, Fu Y. Utrogestan as an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(21):e909. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000909.
PMID: 26020402BACKGROUNDLambalk CB, Banga FR, Huirne JA, Toftager M, Pinborg A, Homburg R, van der Veen F, van Wely M. GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Sep 1;23(5):560-579. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx017.
PMID: 28903472BACKGROUNDVerberg MF, Eijkemans MJ, Heijnen EM, Broekmans FJ, de Klerk C, Fauser BC, Macklon NS. Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2008 Sep;23(9):2050-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den219. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
PMID: 18544578BACKGROUNDRichter TA, Robinson JE, Lozano JM, Evans NP. Progesterone can block the preovulatory gonadotropin-releasing hormone/luteinising hormone surge in the ewe by a direct inhibitory action on oestradiol-responsive cells within the hypothalamus. J Neuroendocrinol. 2005 Mar;17(3):161-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2005.01287.x.
PMID: 15796768BACKGROUNDKuang Y, Chen Q, Fu Y, Wang Y, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Shoham Z. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):62-70.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 May 5.
PMID: 25956370BACKGROUNDGriesinger G, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis B, Kolibianakis EM. To pill or not to pill in GnRH-antagonist cycles: the answer is in the data already! Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Jul;31(1):6-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
PMID: 25985996BACKGROUNDDevroey P, Polyzos NP, Blockeel C. An OHSS-Free Clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2593-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der251. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
PMID: 21828116BACKGROUNDCedrin-Durnerin I, Bstandig B, Parneix I, Bied-Damon V, Avril C, Decanter C, Hugues JN. Effects of oral contraceptive, synthetic progestogen or natural estrogen pre-treatments on the hormonal profile and the antral follicle cohort before GnRH antagonist protocol. Hum Reprod. 2007 Jan;22(1):109-16. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del340. Epub 2006 Aug 26.
PMID: 16936304BACKGROUNDDong J, Wang Y, Chai WR, Hong QQ, Wang NL, Sun LH, Long H, Wang L, Tian H, Lyu QF, Lu XF, Chen QJ, Kuang YP. The pregnancy outcome of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using 4 versus 10 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate per day in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017 Jun;124(7):1048-1055. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14622.
PMID: 28276192BACKGROUNDVidal MDM, Martinez F, Rodriguez I, Polyzos NP. Ovarian response and embryo ploidy following oral micronized progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol. A prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles. Hum Reprod. 2024 May 2;39(5):1098-1104. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae047.
PMID: 38498835DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical and Scientific Director of Dexeus Mujer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2019
First Posted
September 27, 2019
Study Start
September 25, 2019
Primary Completion
January 15, 2022
Study Completion
May 15, 2022
Last Updated
May 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share