NCT04108039

Brief Summary

To examine whether the number of euploid embryos following ovarian stimulation with micronized progesterone is equivalent as compared with the number of embryos after ovarian stimulation with the use of a GnRH antagonist in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF or intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 20, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 25, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 27, 2019

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 15, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 15, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 15, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

September 20, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 12, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of euploid embryos as compared between the 2 ovarian stimulation cycles

    Number of euploid embryos between oocytes received from the antagonist GnRh protocol or the micronized progesterone protocol.

    15-45 days following oocyte retrieval procedure

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Endocrine profile at specific intervals

    Stimulation day 0, day 6, day 8, day of final oocyte maturation and day +1 after oocyte maturation (actual day may vary between 9-15)

  • Endocrine profile at specific intervals

    Stimulation day 0, day 6, day 8, day of final oocyte maturation and day +1 after oocyte maturation (actual day may vary between 9-15)

  • Endocrine profile at specific intervals

    Stimulation day 0, day 6, day 8, day of final oocyte maturation and day +1 after oocyte maturation (actual day may vary between 9-15)

  • Duration of stimulation

    9-20 days from initiation of ovarian stimulation

  • Incidence of premature LH rise

    9-20 days from initiation of ovarian stimulation

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

GnRH antagonist

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the antagonist cycle, LH suppression will be accomplished by subcutaneous (SC) injections of 0.25 mg of Cetrorelix or Ganirelix starting in the presence of follicles \>14mm or E2 levels \>400 pg/ml and continuing until ovulation triggering.

Drug: GnRh antagonist

Micronized progesterone

EXPERIMENTAL

In the progesterone cycle, endogenous LH suppression will be accomplished by oral administration of micronized progesterone (200 mg) once a day at bed time, from stimulation day 1 and continuing until ovulation triggering.

Drug: Micronized progesterone

Interventions

In the antagonist cycle, LH suppression will be accomplished by subcutaneous (SC) injections of 0.25 mg of Cetrorelix or Ganirelix starting in the presence of follicles \>14mm or E2 levels \>400 pg/ml and continuing until ovulation triggering to avoid LH surge in COS

Also known as: Cetrorelix or Ganirelix
GnRH antagonist

Micronized progesterone protocol to avoid LH surge in COS, from stimulation day 1 and continuing until ovulation triggering.

Also known as: Utrogestan
Micronized progesterone

Eligibility Criteria

Age36 Years - 40 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Infertile patients
  • Age 36-40 years old
  • BMI 18-30 kg/m2
  • Undergoing preimplantation genetic screening cycles
  • Planned to undergo at least two treatment cycles, to accumulate embryos to increase the chance of obtaining euploid embryos for transfer
  • Willing to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Age\> 41
  • Severe male factor requiring TESE (testicular sperm extraction)
  • Low ovarian reserve (AMH \< 1.2 ng/ml)
  • Administration of any other drug potentially interfering with the treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institut Universitari Dexeus

Barcelona, Catalonia, 08028, Spain

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Zhang J, Mao X, Wang Y, Chen Q, Lu X, Hong Q, Kuang Y. Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after human menopausal gonadotropin and medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Dec;296(6):1207-1217. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4537-z. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

    PMID: 28948397BACKGROUND
  • Zhu X, Ye H, Fu Y. Use of Utrogestan during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in normally ovulating women undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatments in combination with a "freeze all" strategy: a randomized controlled dose-finding study of 100 mg versus 200 mg. Fertil Steril. 2017 Feb;107(2):379-386.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

    PMID: 27865446BACKGROUND
  • Zhu X, Zhang X, Fu Y. Utrogestan as an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(21):e909. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000909.

    PMID: 26020402BACKGROUND
  • Lambalk CB, Banga FR, Huirne JA, Toftager M, Pinborg A, Homburg R, van der Veen F, van Wely M. GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Sep 1;23(5):560-579. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx017.

    PMID: 28903472BACKGROUND
  • Verberg MF, Eijkemans MJ, Heijnen EM, Broekmans FJ, de Klerk C, Fauser BC, Macklon NS. Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2008 Sep;23(9):2050-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den219. Epub 2008 Jun 10.

    PMID: 18544578BACKGROUND
  • Richter TA, Robinson JE, Lozano JM, Evans NP. Progesterone can block the preovulatory gonadotropin-releasing hormone/luteinising hormone surge in the ewe by a direct inhibitory action on oestradiol-responsive cells within the hypothalamus. J Neuroendocrinol. 2005 Mar;17(3):161-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2005.01287.x.

    PMID: 15796768BACKGROUND
  • Kuang Y, Chen Q, Fu Y, Wang Y, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Shoham Z. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):62-70.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 May 5.

    PMID: 25956370BACKGROUND
  • Griesinger G, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis B, Kolibianakis EM. To pill or not to pill in GnRH-antagonist cycles: the answer is in the data already! Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Jul;31(1):6-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

    PMID: 25985996BACKGROUND
  • Devroey P, Polyzos NP, Blockeel C. An OHSS-Free Clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2593-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der251. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

    PMID: 21828116BACKGROUND
  • Cedrin-Durnerin I, Bstandig B, Parneix I, Bied-Damon V, Avril C, Decanter C, Hugues JN. Effects of oral contraceptive, synthetic progestogen or natural estrogen pre-treatments on the hormonal profile and the antral follicle cohort before GnRH antagonist protocol. Hum Reprod. 2007 Jan;22(1):109-16. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del340. Epub 2006 Aug 26.

    PMID: 16936304BACKGROUND
  • Dong J, Wang Y, Chai WR, Hong QQ, Wang NL, Sun LH, Long H, Wang L, Tian H, Lyu QF, Lu XF, Chen QJ, Kuang YP. The pregnancy outcome of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using 4 versus 10 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate per day in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017 Jun;124(7):1048-1055. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14622.

    PMID: 28276192BACKGROUND
  • Vidal MDM, Martinez F, Rodriguez I, Polyzos NP. Ovarian response and embryo ploidy following oral micronized progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol. A prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles. Hum Reprod. 2024 May 2;39(5):1098-1104. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae047.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Interventions

LHRH, Ac-Nal(1)-Cpa(2)-Trp(3)-Arg(6)-Ala(10)-cetrorelixganirelixProgesteroneUtrogestan

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital DiseasesUrogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PregnenedionesPregnenesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsCorpus Luteum HormonesGonadal HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsProgesterone CongenersGonadal Steroid Hormones

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: 44 women undergoing IVF treatments due to infertility, will be asked to participate in a trial in which they will undergo 2 ovarian stimulation protocols with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH): the first one using a flexible antagonist protocol to suppress the endogenous LH rise and the second using oral micronized progesterone 200 mg/day from day 1 of stimulation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical and Scientific Director of Dexeus Mujer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2019

First Posted

September 27, 2019

Study Start

September 25, 2019

Primary Completion

January 15, 2022

Study Completion

May 15, 2022

Last Updated

May 15, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations