NCT04107974

Brief Summary

Percutaneous (through the skin) radiologic (x-ray guided) gastrostomy (to the stomach) (PRG) is a common procedure performed to help provide supplemental nutrition for those for who have difficulty swallowing their food. This population typically includes patients receiving radiation therapy for cancers of the mouth or throat, patients who have had a stroke or other neurologic disorders. It involves making a small incision in the skin on the belly to insert a feeding tube directly into the stomach. PRG has been well established as a safe and effective procedure for many years now. Although known to be safe, there is still debate regarding the best way to perform the procedure. Some doctors believe it is necessary to stitch the stomach wall against the wall of the belly before inserting the tube, this is called gastropexy. They argue that this decreases the risk of the tube being positioned incorrectly and prevents leakage of stomach content in the first few weeks after the procedure. Other doctors feel that these risks are very small and this step is not required as it can cause the patient more pain in the days following the procedure since the stomach is fixed against the body wall and cannot move naturally. To this day, the procedure is performed safely both ways, depending on the hospital. The purpose of this research study is to compare these two methods and determine if one technique gives better results, meaning less pain and fewer complications for patients.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 27, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 11, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 11, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 27, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

May 20, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 25, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

GastropexyPercutaneous Radiologic GastrostomyInterventional Radiology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain level as reported on 10-point Visual Analog Scale

    10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) with specific procedure-related questions, as outlined in the pre- and post-procedure questionnaire.

    Pre-procedure baseline measure, post-procedure (day 1) measure, and 30 day post-procedure measure

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Complications

    30 days post-procedure follow-up.

Study Arms (2)

Gastropexy

EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous radiologic guided insertion of G-tube. The skin over the epigastrium is prepared and draped in sterile fashion. Midazolam and fentanyl are administered for conscious sedation. Lidocaine for local analgesia. The stomach is insufflated with air after insertion of an OG or NG tube. Two T-fasteners are inserted into the stomach approximately 4cm apart. A needle is inserted into the stomach and an Amplatz wire is then inserted into the stomach. The tract is dilated with an 18Fr peel away sheath. A 14 Fr balloon retention gastrostomy tube is inserted. The balloon is inflated and bolster set as appropriate. The gastropexy/T-fastener sutures are cut after one week.

Device: Gastropexy.

Non-Gastropexy

EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous radiologic guided insertion of G-tube. The skin over the epigastrium is prepared and draped in sterile fashion. Midazolam and fentanyl are administered for conscious sedation. Lidocaine for local analgesia. The stomach is insufflated with air after insertion of an OG or NG tube. A needle is inserted into the stomach and an Amplatz wire is then inserted into the stomach. The tract is dilated with an 18Fr peel away sheath. A 14 Fr balloon retention gastrostomy tube is inserted. The balloon is inflated and bolster set as appropriate.

Procedure: Non-Gastropexy

Interventions

Two T-fasteners for G-tube insertion (gastropexy).

Gastropexy

Insertion of G-tube in absence of T-fasteners.

Non-Gastropexy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults (age 18 years and older) meeting standard eligibility criteria for percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy
  • Dysphagia related to malignancy or surgery/radiation therapy
  • Able to appropriately understand and complete English questionnaires either independently or with the assistance of a translator

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Unable or unwilling to complete the pre and post-procedure questionnaires
  • Dysphagia related to neurological deficits
  • Large volume of ascites
  • Prior partial gastrectomy
  • Long-term steroid use

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Toronto General Hospital - University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Gastropexy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Central Study Contacts

Ganesan Annamalai, MB, BCh, BAO, FRCSI, FRCR

CONTACT

Shawn Bailey, MD, BHSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Patients and interventional radiologists cannot be blinded to the procedure as the follow up and performing the procedure for gastropexy versus non-gastropexy is different.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial comparing gastropexy to non-gastropexy for quality of life and complications.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2019

First Posted

September 27, 2019

Study Start

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion

November 11, 2019

Study Completion

November 11, 2019

Last Updated

September 27, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

This is a single center trial. Only researchers at this site will have access to the participant data.

Locations