Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Evaluating the Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized Feasibility Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a repetitive transcranial magnetic simulation (rTMS) protocol developed for managing pain and other related symptoms associated with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2022
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2024
CompletedAugust 24, 2022
August 1, 2022
1 year
September 18, 2019
August 22, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Eligibility rate
The proportion of screened patients meeting the inclusion criteria.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Recruitment time
The mean number of participants been recruited each month.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Recruitment rate
The proportion of eligible patients who are finally recruited in the study.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Retention/attrition rate
The proportion of recruited participants who complete the study or who drop out from the study with or without any reason.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Appropriateness of clinical outcome measures
The proportion of incomplete questionnaires and neurological tests.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Participants' perceived effectiveness
In this study, affective attitude and perceived effectiveness will be measured by using the Chinese version of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, a single-item 7-point numerical rating scale from 1 to 7 demonstrating participants' subjective perception of improvement and satisfaction after receiving the intervention (Hurst \& Bolton, 2004). The PGIC scale has been recommended by the rTMS research guideline for pain (Klein et al., 2015).
Baseline up to 5 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Pain perception
Baseline up to 5 weeks
Neuropathic symptoms and signs
Baseline up to 5 weeks
Miscellaneous symptoms associated with CIPN
Baseline up to 5 weeks
Health-related quality of life
Baseline up to 5 weeks
Adverse Effects
Baseline up to 5 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALReal rTMS
Control group
SHAM COMPARATORSham rTMS
Interventions
The real rTMS will be delivered over M1 (hand representation) of dual hemispheres with 10 trains of 10 Hz pulses for 10 seconds, with a total of 1,000 pulses per hemisphere. The real rTMS intensity will be set as 80% resting motor threshold and the interval between each train of pulses will be set as 50 seconds. The real rTMS will be delivered as daily session for five consecutive days, followed by two fortnightly maintenance sessions during the follow-up period after the completion of five daily sessions. The real rTMS will be delivered by designated physical therapists using "figure-of-8" shaped coil.
The sham rTMS of this study will be delivered with the same active coil angled 90-degree way from the scalp. The intensity of sham rTMS will be set at lowest stimulator output that can generate similar noise to the real rTMS. The sham rTMS will be delivered in the same manner and duration with real rTMS.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- have completed oxaliplatin-, paclitaxel-, or docetaxel-based chemotherapy for at least 3 months;
- complain of persistent symptoms associated with CIPN such as numbness, tingling, burning, or pain with scores ≥ 4 on a numerical rating scale for average daily intensity (0-10, with 10 being the worst) and/or determined as grade 2 or higher CIPN by oncologist according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (2017);
- with decreased vibration and/or pinprick sensations according to neurological test (provided by the doctoral researcher when patients was referred by their oncologists);
- have a Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 70;
- can travel to the research hospitals for receiving the study intervention.
You may not qualify if:
- having brain tumor or brain metastasis;
- having pregnancy;
- having implanted medical devices;
- having history of epilepsy, brain lesion, head trauma, neurosurgical procedures, or intracranial hypertension;
- having a diagnosis of psychiatric disorder (e.g. bipolar, ongoing major depression, or schizophrenia) and/or treating with antipsychotic drugs;
- having preexisting peripheral neuropathy before initiation of chemotherapy; g) withdrawing from alcohol or sedative medications;
- having a life expectancy less than six months;
- treating with naloxone, which can block analgesic effect of rTMS over M1;
- previously treated with rTMS. Patients receiving any other treatment for CIPN may not be excluded, but they will be required not to change the type and dosage of the current treatments. Furthermore, such information will be collected as baseline clinical data and will be treated as confounding factors during data analysis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alex Molassiotis, PhD
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2019
First Posted
September 27, 2019
Study Start
December 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
March 1, 2024
Last Updated
August 24, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08