NCT04105790

Brief Summary

This study will examine the acceptability and effectiveness of using a stepped care treatment model, and specifically, the CBTm classes, in a rural population. The introduction of CBTm classes, developed in Winnipeg and used in outpatient mental health clinics there, is new to Adult Community Mental Health in the Prairie Mountain Health region. This research is being done to explore whether this is a treatment model that is effective at reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression and also whether it affects the workload for Community Mental Health Workers in a more rural area. Further, this research is being done to explore whether clients perceive this form of services to be useful and acceptable.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 23, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 26, 2019

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 2, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 23, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 31, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Stepped Model of CareClass-Based Intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Self-report measure of severity of depressive symptoms to be completed prior to each intervention class. Each of the 9 items is scored 0-3 (0 = not at all; 3 = nearly every day), yielding a total between 0 and 27, with higher scores representing increased severity of depression symptoms.

    Change measure (baseline, week 2, week 3, and week 4)

  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)

    Self-report measure of severity of generalized anxiety symptoms to be completed prior to each intervention class. Each of the 7 items is scored 0-3 (0 = not at all; 3 = nearly every day), yielding a total between 0 and 21, with higher scores representing increased severity of generalized anxiety symptoms.

    Change measure (baseline, week 2, week 3, and week 4)

  • Acceptability Survey

    Self-report measure of the acceptability of different elements of the intervention to be completed prior to the first and fourth classes.

    Change measure (baseline and week 4)

  • Class Evaluation Form

    Self-report measure of the acceptability of different elements of the intervention to be completed prior to the first and fourth intervention classes.

    Data collected weekly throughout the four weeks of study enrolment

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI)

    Change measure (baseline at week 2, week 3, and week 4)

  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Skills Questionnaire (CBTSQ)

    Change measure (baseline, week 2, week 3, and week 4)

  • Treatment Acceptability/Adherence Scale (TAAS)

    Change measure (baseline, week 2, week 3, and week 4)

  • Homework Record

    Data collected weekly throughout the four weeks of study enrolment

Study Arms (1)

Participants

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in class-based mental health intervention.

Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy with Mindfulness classes

Interventions

The standard CBTm protocol is comprised of four 90-minute classes offered virtually via videoconferencing once a week for four consecutive weeks. The classes cover topics including mindfulness, cognitive therapy principles, behaviour therapy principles, managing anger, assertiveness, problem solving, goal setting, and evidence-based self-help resources. They are lecture-based but also involve experiential elements, such as mindfulness activities and practice of cognitive therapy strategies. Participants are assigned daily homework between each class to practice the strategies taught in session.

Participants

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult clients (18+ years) accessing community mental health services for symptoms of depression and anxiety, and
  • Interest in attending Cognitive Behaviour Therapy with Mindfulness classes.

You may not qualify if:

  • Active psychosis or mania,
  • Acutely elevated suicide risk,
  • Severe cognitive impairment, and/or
  • Non-English speaking.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Prairie Mountain Health South - Adult Community Mental Health

Brandon, Manitoba, R7A 6N5, Canada

Location

Prairie Mountain Health North - Community Mental Health

Dauphin, Manitoba, R7N 1R7, Canada

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Sareen, J., Sala, T., Wong, J., Whitney, D., & Kinley, J. (2016). CBTm facilitator training manual. Retrieved from http://cbtm.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Facilitators_binder.pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Thakur VK, Wong JY, Randall JR, Bolton JM, Parikh SV, Mota N, Whitney D, Palay J, Kinley J, Diocee S, Sala T, Sareen J. An evaluation of large group cognitive behaviour therapy with mindfulness (CBTm) classes. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 May 3;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2124-5.

    PMID: 31053070BACKGROUND
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

    PMID: 11556941BACKGROUND
  • Jacob KL, Christopher MS, Neuhaus EC. Development and validation of the cognitive-behavioral therapy skills questionnaire. Behav Modif. 2011 Nov;35(6):595-618. doi: 10.1177/0145445511419254. Epub 2011 Sep 5.

    PMID: 21893554BACKGROUND
  • Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37.

    PMID: 20526405BACKGROUND
  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

    PMID: 16717171BACKGROUND
  • Milosevic I, Levy HC, Alcolado GM, Radomsky AS. The Treatment Acceptability/Adherence Scale: Moving Beyond the Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness. Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(6):456-69. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1053407. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

    PMID: 26091250BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DepressionAnxiety Disorders

Interventions

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Pamela Black, PhD

    University of Manitoba

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: The overarching design of the proposed study is a formative program evaluation using a case series methodology.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2019

First Posted

September 26, 2019

Study Start

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion

May 1, 2021

Study Completion

May 1, 2021

Last Updated

June 2, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations