NCT04104724

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a new self-help intervention designed to support individuals (anyone with a cervix) to access cervical cancer screening following the experience of sexual assault, by addressing psychological barriers identified by previous research, specifically shame, low self-efficacy and the re-traumatising nature of attending to sexual health after sexual trauma.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 24, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 26, 2019

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 20, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 3, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 3, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 30, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

September 24, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 26, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Acceptability: Is the intervention acceptable to the intended audience?

    A series of statements written by the researchers asking for feedback on the intervention, including frequency of use, interest in the content, satisfaction. To be rated on a five-point scale (Completely agree - Completely disagree). This will be analysed descriptively (e.g. how many people would recommend the app to others having similar difficulties?)

    Six weeks

  • Behavioural change - Does use of the intervention lead to an increase in bookings and attendance at screenings?

    Participants will be asked to report their progress at baseline and follow-up by answering a series of questions written by the researchers, for example 'I have contacted my GP surgery to ask them when cervical screening clinics take place' - Yes/No; 'I attended my cervical screening appointment' - Yes/No.

    Six weeks

  • Behavioural change - Does use of the intervention facilitate completing a cervical screening? (i.e. does the intervention have limited efficacy?)

    Participants will be asked whether or not they have completed their cervical screening at baseline and follow-up. Answer options will be yes/no/appointment booked but hasn't happened yet

    Six weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Psychological change - Does use of the intervention lead to increased self-efficacy and self-compassion, and reduced shame?

    Six weeks

  • Psychological change - distress

    Six weeks

Study Arms (2)

Self-help

EXPERIMENTAL

Immediate access to self-help materials

Other: Self-help

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Wait-list control - treatment as usual (no intervention)

Interventions

self-help materials - cognitive behavioural and compassion-focused; psychoeducation, practical help re. attending cervical cancer screening

Also known as: compassion-focused therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, psychoeducation
Self-help

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 64 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Has a cevix
  • Within age range for cervical cancer screening in UK (25-64 years)
  • Experience of sexual assault (in childhood and/or adulthood; not within last 12 months)
  • Currently experiencing difficulty attending cervical cancer screening
  • Has access to smartphone/computer with internet
  • Has a valid email address
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Living in UK

You may not qualify if:

  • No cervix
  • Outside of UK cervical cancer screening age range
  • No experience of sexual assault or sexual assault occurred within last 12 months
  • No access to smartphone or computer and internet
  • Unable to read or understand English
  • Not living in UK
  • In acute mental health crisis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (7)

  • Andrews B, Qian M, Valentine JD. Predicting depressive symptoms with a new measure of shame: The Experience of Shame Scale. Br J Clin Psychol. 2002 Mar;41(Pt 1):29-42. doi: 10.1348/014466502163778.

    PMID: 11931676BACKGROUND
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003 Nov;41(11):1284-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C.

    PMID: 14583691BACKGROUND
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Monahan PO, Lowe B. Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 6;146(5):317-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004.

    PMID: 17339617BACKGROUND
  • Weathers, F.W., Litz, B.T., Keane, T.M., Palmieri, P.A., Marx, B.P., & Schnurr, P.P. (2013). The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Scale available from the National Center for PTSD at www.ptsd.va.gov.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gilbert, P., Catarino, F., Duarte, C., Matos, M., Kolts, R., Stubbs, J., ... & Basran, J. (2017). The development of compassionate engagement and action scales for self and others. Journal of Compassionate Health Care, 4(1), 4.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.

    BACKGROUND
  • Cadman L, Waller J, Ashdown-Barr L, Szarewski A. Barriers to cervical screening in women who have experienced sexual abuse: an exploratory study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2012 Oct;38(4):214-20. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100378.

    PMID: 23027982BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychological TraumaUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Interventions

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress Disorders, TraumaticTrauma and Stressor Related DisordersMental DisordersUterine NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsUterine Cervical DiseasesUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Trainee Clinical Psychologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2019

First Posted

September 26, 2019

Study Start

October 20, 2019

Primary Completion

May 3, 2020

Study Completion

May 3, 2020

Last Updated

September 30, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share