Open, Non-Comparative Study To Evaluate The Performance Of The Medical Device JANESSE®
1 other identifier
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The hypothesis of this clinical investigation is that in a population of men and women affected by periocular wrinkles, lip contour wrinkles or deep facial wrinkles, will cross-linked hyaluronic acid (Janesse) significantly decrease the appearance of facial wrinkles, results observed after 4, 8 and 12 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 21, 2020
CompletedFebruary 10, 2021
February 1, 2021
5 months
September 20, 2019
February 9, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
WSRS score assessed by the Investigator
To evaluate the overall safety of the medical device and performance of Janesse® dermal filler in terms of absolute change of WSRS score (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) assessed by Investigator at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment, compared to Baseline Visit (day 0).
12 weeks
AE, SAE, ADE, SADE incidence
AE, SAE, ADE, SADE incidence
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
WSRS score assessed by the patient
12 weeks
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale evaluated by the subject
12 weeks
Treatment satisfaction questionnaire completed by the subject
12 weeks
Investigator Global Assessment of Performance (IGAP)
12 weeks
Investigator Global Assessment of Safety (IGAS)
12 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Janesse
OTHERJanesse® 20 (Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid) Injection: follow the instruction for use
Interventions
The subjects will receive at baseline the first IMD by the Investigator in accordance with the CIP
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men or women with age \> 35 and ≤ 65 years.
- Subjects with nasolabial wrinkles, seeking tissue augmentation treatment and willing to receive HA Filler;
- Subjects presenting a score of 2 (shallow wrinkles) or 3 (moderate, deep wrinkles) on the Wrinkles Severity Ranking Scale (WSRS);
- Subjects who agree to discontinue all dermatological treatment and procedures during the study;
- Subjects willing to provide signed informed consent to clinical investigation participation.
- Able to communicate adequately with the Investigator and to comply with the requirements for the entire study.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have bleeding disorder in the past or present.
- Use of aspirin and antiplatelet agents a week prior to treatment
- Prior or planned use of topical injection to the face (steroid, retinoid: applicable only to drugs, not applicable to cosmetics), within 4 weeks prior to screening or during this study (steroid ointment for therapeutic objectives is allowed for short -term use of ≤14 consecutive days.).
- Use of immunosuppressive, chemotherapies, or systemic corticosteroids within 12 weeks from screening.
- History of anaphylaxis or severe complicated allergy symptoms.
- Clinically significant cardiovascular, digestive, respiratory, endocrine, or central nervous system disorders or previous mental disorders that may significantly affect the study.
- Hypersensitivity skin reaction to the investigational device based on intradermal test results at screening.
- Evidence or history of autoimmune disease or compromised immune system.
- Treatment with anticoagulants, thrombolytics, or platelet inhibitors within 1 week prior to study participation;
- Prior permanent fillers or fat graft procedures around nasolabial folds.
- Wrinkle correction procedures (e.g., botulinum toxin A injection, face lift, soft tissue augmentation, medium-depth peel, dermal photorejuvenation, etc.) within 6 months prior to study participation.
- History of hypersensitivity to local anesthetic of amide type or HA.
- History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scar on the face.
- Evidence of active infection on the face.
- Wound, scar, or skin disorder or infection around nasolabial folds that may affect the efficacy assessment.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SCM Dr. Rosu
Timișoara, Timiș County, 300425, Romania
Related Publications (16)
Fitzgerald R, Graivier MH, Kane M, Lorenc ZP, Vleggaar D, Werschler WP, Kenkel JM. Update on facial aging. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Jul-Aug;30 Suppl:11S-24S. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10378696.
PMID: 20844296BACKGROUNDKim BW, Moon IJ, Yun WJ, Chung BY, Kim SD, Lee GY, Chang SE. A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Face Comparison Study of the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Mannitol Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds. Ann Dermatol. 2016 Jun;28(3):297-303. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.3.297. Epub 2016 May 25.
PMID: 27274627BACKGROUNDFew J, Cox SE, Paradkar-Mitragotri D, Murphy DK. A Multicenter, Single-Blind Randomized, Controlled Study of a Volumizing Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Midface Volume Deficit: Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Jul;35(5):589-99. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv050. Epub 2015 May 11.
PMID: 25964628BACKGROUNDCallan P, Goodman GJ, Carlisle I, Liew S, Muzikants P, Scamp T, Halstead MB, Rogers JD. Efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler in subjects treated for correction of midface volume deficiency: a 24 month study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013 Mar 20;6:81-9. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S40581. Print 2013.
PMID: 23687448BACKGROUNDDong J, Gantz M, Goldenberg G. Efficacy and safety of new dermal fillers. Cutis. 2016 Nov;98(5):309-313.
PMID: 28040813BACKGROUNDDe Boulle K, Heydenrych I. Patient factors influencing dermal filler complications: prevention, assessment, and treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Apr 15;8:205-14. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S80446. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25926750BACKGROUNDRivkin AZ. Volume correction in the aging hand: role of dermal fillers. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Aug 30;9:225-32. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S92853. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27621659BACKGROUNDKuhne U, Esmann J, von Heimburg D, Imhof M, Weissenberger P, Sattler G. Safety and performance of cohesive polydensified matrix hyaluronic acid fillers with lidocaine in the clinical setting - an open-label, multicenter study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Oct 20;9:373-381. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S115256. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27799807BACKGROUNDLorenc ZP, Bank D, Kane M, Lin X, Smith S. Validation of a four-point photographic scale for the assessment of midface volume loss and/or contour deficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec;130(6):1330-1336. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9fa6.
PMID: 23190816BACKGROUNDMcCall-Perez F, Stephens TJ, Herndon JH Jr. Efficacy and tolerability of a facial serum for fine lines, wrinkles, and photodamaged skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011 Jul;4(7):51-4.
PMID: 21779421BACKGROUNDRzany B, Cartier H, Kestemont P, Trevidic P, Sattler G, Kerrouche N, Dhuin JC, Ma YM. Full-face rejuvenation using a range of hyaluronic acid fillers: efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction over 6 months. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7 Pt 2):1153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02470.x.
PMID: 22759252BACKGROUNDVan Dyke S, Hays GP, Caglia AE, Caglia M. Severe Acute Local Reactions to a Hyaluronic Acid-derived Dermal Filler. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 May;3(5):32-5.
PMID: 20725567BACKGROUNDFunt D, Pavicic T. Dermal fillers in aesthetics: an overview of adverse events and treatment approaches. Plast Surg Nurs. 2015 Jan-Mar;35(1):13-32. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000087.
PMID: 25730536BACKGROUNDGhooi RB, Bhosale N, Wadhwani R, Divate P, Divate U. Assessment and classification of protocol deviations. Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):132-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184817.
PMID: 27453830BACKGROUNDJiang LI, Stephens TJ, Goodman R. SWIRL, a clinically validated, objective, and quantitative method for facial wrinkle assessment. Skin Res Technol. 2013 Nov;19(4):492-8. doi: 10.1111/srt.12073. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
PMID: 23750828BACKGROUNDStephens TJ, Sigler ML, Herndon JH Jr, Dispensa L, Le Moigne A. A placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of Imedeen((R)) Time Perfection((R)) for improving the appearance of photodamaged skin. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Mar 15;9:63-70. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S98787. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27042135BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mihaela Fratila
SCM Dr. Rosu
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2019
First Posted
September 25, 2019
Study Start
July 14, 2020
Primary Completion
December 21, 2020
Study Completion
December 21, 2020
Last Updated
February 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02