The Need for Supplemental Blocks in Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks
1 other identifier
observational
139
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Theoretically, all surgeries below mid-humerus can be done under infraclavicular (IC) blocks. Following the introduction of ultrasonography (USG) to clinical anesthesia, plexus, and nerve blocks under the guidance of USG have gained wide acceptance for the high rates of block success and low risk of complications (1). In this study, the main aim is to evaluate the single injection and triple injection techniques in IC blocks with a USG-guided medial approach in terms of block success and the need for supplementary blocks. The secondary goals are to compare the complication rates and sensory block durations and to discuss the possible reasons for the failure of the blocks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2019
CompletedFebruary 20, 2024
February 1, 2024
1.5 years
September 23, 2019
February 16, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Supplemented blocks
30 minutes after the block, if one or two of the median, radial, ulnar or musculocutaneous nerves were still unblocked, these nerves were located either with a peripheric nerve stimulator or an ultrasound, in the axilla or on the more distal parts of their traces on arm and forearm and then supplemented.
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Complete Failure
30 minutes
Recovery of sensory block
24 hours
Discomfort during IC block
1 hour
Inadvertent vascular puncture
1 hour
Study Arms (2)
Single injection
Patients who received an infraclavicular block with a single injection technique were included in Group-S.
Triple injection
Patients who received an infraclavicular block with a triple injection technique were included in Group-T.
Interventions
infraclavicular blocks performed with single injection
infraclavicular blocks performed with triple injection
Eligibility Criteria
patients underwent surgery for upper extremity under medial approach infraclavicular block between October 2017 and March 2019
You may qualify if:
- ASA physical status I-III
- upper extremity surgery
- blocks were performed by the same anesthesiologist
You may not qualify if:
- non-cooperative patients
- refusal of the regional anesthesia
- known neuropathy
- different technique used for infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (lateral sagittal, coracoid, …etc.)
- known allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Derince Training and Research Hospital
Kocaeli, Derince, 41900, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;102(3):408-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen384. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
PMID: 19174373BACKGROUNDLi JW, Songthamwat B, Samy W, Sala-Blanch X, Karmakar MK. Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Sonoanatomy, Technique, and Block Dynamics. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):233-240. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000566.
PMID: 28157792BACKGROUNDKilka HG, Geiger P, Mehrkens HH. [Infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus blockade. A new method for anesthesia of the upper extremity. An anatomical and clinical study]. Anaesthesist. 1995 May;44(5):339-44. doi: 10.1007/s001010050162. German.
PMID: 7611581BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Tuncay Colak, Prof
Kocaeli University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2019
First Posted
September 25, 2019
Study Start
October 1, 2017
Primary Completion
March 31, 2019
Study Completion
May 30, 2019
Last Updated
February 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Data will be available within 6 months of study completion.
- Access Criteria
- Data access requests will be reviewed by the researchers. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement.
De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.