NCT04101825

Brief Summary

Auralya® is a sterile, injectable, non-pyrogenic, re-absorbable medical product made of reticulated hyaluronic acid of non-animal origin, produced via bacterial fermentation. To evaluate the overall safety of the medical device and performance of Auralya® dermal filler in terms of absolute change of WSRS score (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) assessed by Investigator at 8 and 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment, compared to Baseline Visit (day 0).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 20, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 24, 2019

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 16, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 16, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 16, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 12, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

September 20, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 9, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate safety and performance of Auralya

    To evaluate the overall safety of the medical device and performance of Auralya® dermal filler in terms of absolute change of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale assessed by Investigator at 8 and 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment, compared to Baseline Visit (day 0).

    12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale

    12 weeks

  • General appearance after treatment

    12 weeks

  • Subject satisfaction

    12 weeks

  • Global evaluation of product performance

    12 weeks

  • Product safety

    12 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Auralya

EXPERIMENTAL

Auralya® 25 (Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid) Injection

Device: Auralya

Interventions

AuralyaDEVICE

Hyaluronic Acid-Dermal Filler

Auralya

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men or women with age \> 35 and ≤ 65 years.
  • Subjects with nasolabial wrinkles, seeking tissue augmentation treatment and willing to receive HA Filler;
  • Subjects presenting a score of 2 (shallow wrinkles) or 3 (moderate, deep wrinkles) on the Wrinkles Severity Ranking Scale (WSRS);
  • Subjects who agree to discontinue all dermatological treatment and procedures during the study;
  • Subjects willing to provide signed informed consent to clinical investigation participation.
  • Able to communicate adequately with the Investigator and to comply with the requirements for the entire study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects who have bleeding disorder in the past or present.
  • Use of aspirin and antiplatelet agents a week prior to treatment
  • Prior or planned use of topical injection to the face (steroid, retinoid: applicable only to drugs, not applicable to cosmetics), within 4 weeks prior to screening or during this study (steroid ointment for therapeutic objectives is allowed for short -term use of ≤14 consecutive days.).
  • Use of immunosuppressive, chemotherapies, or systemic corticosteroids within 12 weeks from screening.
  • History of anaphylaxis or severe complicated allergy symptoms.
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular, digestive, respiratory, endocrine, or central nervous system disorders or previous mental disorders that may significantly affect the study.
  • Hypersensitivity skin reaction to the investigational device based on intradermal test results at screening.
  • Evidence or history of autoimmune disease or compromised immune system.
  • Treatment with anticoagulants, thrombolytics, or platelet inhibitors within 1 week prior to study participation;
  • Prior permanent fillers or fat graft procedures around nasolabial folds.
  • Wrinkle correction procedures (e.g., botulinum toxin A injection, face lift, soft tissue augmentation, medium-depth peel, dermal photorejuvenation, etc.) within 6 months prior to study participation.
  • History of hypersensitivity to local anesthetic of amide type or HA.
  • History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scar on the face.
  • Evidence of active infection on the face.
  • Wound, scar, or skin disorder or infection around nasolabial folds that may affect the efficacy assessment.
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

SCM Dr. Rosu

Timișoara, Timiș County, 300425, Romania

Location

Related Publications (22)

  • Fitzgerald R, Graivier MH, Kane M, Lorenc ZP, Vleggaar D, Werschler WP, Kenkel JM. Update on facial aging. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Jul-Aug;30 Suppl:11S-24S. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10378696.

    PMID: 20844296BACKGROUND
  • Sudha PN, Rose MH. Beneficial effects of hyaluronic acid. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2014;72:137-176. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800269-8.00009-9.

    PMID: 25081082BACKGROUND
  • Kim BW, Moon IJ, Yun WJ, Chung BY, Kim SD, Lee GY, Chang SE. A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Face Comparison Study of the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Mannitol Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds. Ann Dermatol. 2016 Jun;28(3):297-303. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.3.297. Epub 2016 May 25.

    PMID: 27274627BACKGROUND
  • Kopera D, Palatin M, Bartsch R, Bartsch K, O'Rourke M, Holler S, Baumgartner RR, Prinz M. An open-label uncontrolled, multicenter study for the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the dermal filler Princess VOLUME in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:195328. doi: 10.1155/2015/195328. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

    PMID: 25821787BACKGROUND
  • Few J, Cox SE, Paradkar-Mitragotri D, Murphy DK. A Multicenter, Single-Blind Randomized, Controlled Study of a Volumizing Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Midface Volume Deficit: Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Jul;35(5):589-99. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv050. Epub 2015 May 11.

    PMID: 25964628BACKGROUND
  • Callan P, Goodman GJ, Carlisle I, Liew S, Muzikants P, Scamp T, Halstead MB, Rogers JD. Efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler in subjects treated for correction of midface volume deficiency: a 24 month study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013 Mar 20;6:81-9. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S40581. Print 2013.

    PMID: 23687448BACKGROUND
  • Dong J, Gantz M, Goldenberg G. Efficacy and safety of new dermal fillers. Cutis. 2016 Nov;98(5):309-313.

    PMID: 28040813BACKGROUND
  • De Boulle K, Heydenrych I. Patient factors influencing dermal filler complications: prevention, assessment, and treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Apr 15;8:205-14. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S80446. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 25926750BACKGROUND
  • Rivkin AZ. Volume correction in the aging hand: role of dermal fillers. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Aug 30;9:225-32. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S92853. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27621659BACKGROUND
  • Kuhne U, Esmann J, von Heimburg D, Imhof M, Weissenberger P, Sattler G. Safety and performance of cohesive polydensified matrix hyaluronic acid fillers with lidocaine in the clinical setting - an open-label, multicenter study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Oct 20;9:373-381. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S115256. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27799807BACKGROUND
  • Lorenc ZP, Bank D, Kane M, Lin X, Smith S. Validation of a four-point photographic scale for the assessment of midface volume loss and/or contour deficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec;130(6):1330-1336. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9fa6.

    PMID: 23190816BACKGROUND
  • Chen WY, Abatangelo G. Functions of hyaluronan in wound repair. Wound Repair Regen. 1999 Mar-Apr;7(2):79-89. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00079.x.

    PMID: 10231509BACKGROUND
  • McCall-Perez F, Stephens TJ, Herndon JH Jr. Efficacy and tolerability of a facial serum for fine lines, wrinkles, and photodamaged skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011 Jul;4(7):51-4.

    PMID: 21779421BACKGROUND
  • Rzany B, Cartier H, Kestemont P, Trevidic P, Sattler G, Kerrouche N, Dhuin JC, Ma YM. Full-face rejuvenation using a range of hyaluronic acid fillers: efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction over 6 months. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7 Pt 2):1153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02470.x.

    PMID: 22759252BACKGROUND
  • Van Dyke S, Hays GP, Caglia AE, Caglia M. Severe Acute Local Reactions to a Hyaluronic Acid-derived Dermal Filler. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 May;3(5):32-5.

    PMID: 20725567BACKGROUND
  • Funt D, Pavicic T. Dermal fillers in aesthetics: an overview of adverse events and treatment approaches. Plast Surg Nurs. 2015 Jan-Mar;35(1):13-32. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000087.

    PMID: 25730536BACKGROUND
  • Bhatt A. Protocol deviation and violation. Perspect Clin Res. 2012 Jul;3(3):117. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.100663. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23125964BACKGROUND
  • Ghooi RB, Bhosale N, Wadhwani R, Divate P, Divate U. Assessment and classification of protocol deviations. Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):132-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184817.

    PMID: 27453830BACKGROUND
  • Yeom J, Bhang SH, Kim BS, Seo MS, Hwang EJ, Cho IH, Park JK, Hahn SK. Effect of cross-linking reagents for hyaluronic acid hydrogel dermal fillers on tissue augmentation and regeneration. Bioconjug Chem. 2010 Feb 17;21(2):240-7. doi: 10.1021/bc9002647.

    PMID: 20078098BACKGROUND
  • Jiang LI, Stephens TJ, Goodman R. SWIRL, a clinically validated, objective, and quantitative method for facial wrinkle assessment. Skin Res Technol. 2013 Nov;19(4):492-8. doi: 10.1111/srt.12073. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

    PMID: 23750828BACKGROUND
  • Stephens TJ, Sigler ML, Herndon JH Jr, Dispensa L, Le Moigne A. A placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of Imedeen((R)) Time Perfection((R)) for improving the appearance of photodamaged skin. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Mar 15;9:63-70. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S98787. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27042135BACKGROUND
  • Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Nov;108(6):1735-50; discussion 1751-2. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00048.

    PMID: 11711957BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Mihaela Fratila, MD

    SCM Dr. Rosu

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This trial is open label, multi-center, non-randomized single group.
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2019

First Posted

September 24, 2019

Study Start

September 16, 2020

Primary Completion

March 16, 2021

Study Completion

March 16, 2021

Last Updated

April 12, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Locations