Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
observational
900
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The rate of adequate bowel preparation is one of important quality indicators of colonoscopy. Inadeqaute bowel preparation negatively affects the outcomes of colonoscopy. If patients with inadequate bowel preparation were identified before the procedure, enhanced strategy could be offerred to achieve better bowel cleasing. Currently, there were three predicting models of inadequate bowel preparation eatablished based on patient-related factors. It remains unclear which model perfroms better in predicting bowel preparation quality. Futhermore, althought those predicting models only composing of patients-related factors are useful for identifing high-risk patients, the preparation-related factors may also be valuable for prediciting inadeqaute bowel preparation before the procedure of colonoscopy. This study aimed: 1) to compare the values of three availlable models (based on patient-related factors) in predicting inadeqaute bowel preparation in a prospective, multicentered cohort of patients undergoing colonoscopy; 2) to investigate whether a new model based on preparation-related or a combined model based on patient-related and preparation-related factors is comparable to previous models based on patient-related factors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2020
CompletedJune 16, 2020
June 1, 2020
7 months
September 21, 2019
June 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Inadequate bowel preparation
Inadequate bowel preparation was defined by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale of any segmental\<2.
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Adequacy of proximal bowel preparation
1 hour
Adequacy of distal bowel preparation
1 hour
Study Arms (2)
training group
All patients received oral and written instructions on the appointment day. All patients were instructed to have low-residue food for lunch and dinner on the day before colonoscopy. Patients were instructed to begin drinking the first 1.5L-2L PEG at 7:00-9:00 PM on the day before colonoscopy. On the day of the procedure, they took another 1.5L-2L 4-6 hours before colonoscopy. Patients were encouraged more to drink more clear liquids after purgatives for adequate hydration.
validation group
All patients received oral and written instructions on the appointment day. All patients were instructed to have low-residue food for lunch and dinner on the day before colonoscopy. Patients were instructed to begin drinking the first 1.5L-2L PEG at 7:00-9:00 PM on the day before colonoscopy. On the day of the procedure, they took another 1.5L-2L 4-6 hours before colonoscopy. Patients were encouraged more to drink more clear liquids after purgatives for adequate hydration.
Eligibility Criteria
Using PEG for bowel preparation before colonoscopy
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-80
- Using PEG for bowel preparation before colonoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Not undergoing standard bowel preparation due to emergency, bleeding or unsuitable for preparation
- Colon resection
- Suspected bowel obstruction
- Hemodynamically unstable
- Lactating or pregnant women
- Unwilling to provided informed content
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Air Force Military Medical University, Chinalead
- Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical Universitycollaborator
- Xiamen Humanity Hospitalcollaborator
- Huaihe Hospital of Henan Universitycollaborator
- Shaanxi Second People's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Department of Gastroenterology, Hongai Hospital
Xiamen, Fujian, 361000, China
Department of Holistic Integrative Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 510000, China
Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University
Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China
Department of Gastroenterology, Shaanxi Second People's Hospital
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710005, China
Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China
Related Publications (3)
Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, Pagano N, Spada C, Carrara S, Giordanino C, Rondonotti E, Curcio G, Dulbecco P, Fabbri C, Della Casa D, Maiero S, Simone A, Iacopini F, Feliciangeli G, Manes G, Rinaldi A, Zullo A, Rogai F, Repici A. A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 May;10(5):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.12.037. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
PMID: 22239959RESULTDik VK, Moons LM, Huyuk M, van der Schaar P, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Ter Borg PC, Meijssen MA, Ouwendijk RJ, Le Fevre DM, Stouten M, van der Galien O, Hiemstra TJ, Monkelbaan JF, van Oijen MG, Siersema PD; Colonoscopy Quality Initiative. Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):665-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.066. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
PMID: 25600879RESULTGimeno-Garcia AZ, Baute JL, Hernandez G, Morales D, Gonzalez-Perez CD, Nicolas-Perez D, Alarcon-Fernandez O, Jimenez A, Hernandez-Guerra M, Romero R, Alonso I, Gonzalez Y, Adrian Z, Carrillo M, Ramos L, Quintero E. Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation: a validated predictive score. Endoscopy. 2017 Jun;49(6):536-543. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101683. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
PMID: 28282690RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2019
First Posted
September 24, 2019
Study Start
September 3, 2019
Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Study Completion
March 30, 2020
Last Updated
June 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06