Laser Treated vs SLA Treated Short Implants in Terms of Stability.

NCT04100382 | Unknown DMC

• 1 other identifier: 1719
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 8
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

Laser treated short dental implants will be placed in a posterior atrophic ridge with only 8-10 mm available bone height. Their stability will be measured through a period of 12 weeks. They will be compared to the stability of SLA treated Short dental implants placed in the same situations.

Conditions

Will Laser Treated Dental Implants Improve Stability Early Healing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Rate of change in implant stability at base line, 2,4,8, 12 weeks

  measuring implant stability with resonance frequency analysis device using implant stability quotation (ISQ) that measures the stiffness and deflection of implant bone complex.

  3 months

Study Arms (1)

Laser and SLA implants

EXPERIMENTAL

Surgical placement of short implants in maxillary posterior teeth with Laser surface treated and SLA surface treated dental implants

Device: Laser and SLA

Interventions

Laser and SLA DEVICE

Patients will be randomized into two groups, control group for SLA implants, and study group will receive the Laser treated implants. Implants will be placed classically in the posterior maxillary region and their stability will be measured by ISQ device at the placement. Measurements will be taken again at 2, 4, 6, 8 , 10 and 12 weeks.

Laser and SLA implants

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Adult patients with Edentulous posterior maxillae with insufficient ridge for placement of standard length dental implant, but allowing placement of short 8mm dental implant.
• Males and females.

You may not qualify if:

• Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
• Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
• Psychiatric problems
• Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site
• Patients suffering from immunodeficiency, bruxism, stress situation (socially or professionally), emotional instability, and unrealistic aesthetic demands.
• Intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Cairo University: lead

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Lasers

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Optical Devices; Equipment and Supplies; Radiation Equipment and Supplies

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: NA
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: SINGLE GROUP
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Principle investigator

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: September 13, 2019
• First Posted: September 24, 2019
• Study Start: September 15, 2019
• Primary Completion: September 15, 2020
• Study Completion: September 15, 2020
• Last Updated: September 24, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09