NCT04099485

Brief Summary

Background and Significance - Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common significant cardiac rhythm disorder and is a powerful common risk factor for stroke. Randomized trials have demonstrated that anticoagulation can reduce the risk of stroke in patients with AF. Yet, there continues to be widespread underutilization of this therapy. To address this practice gap locally and improve stroke prevention for patients with AF in the UC Health system, the investigators have assembled an interprofessional team, the Cincinnati Atrial Fibrillation Initiative (CAFI). Objectives - The objective of this project, "EHR-Embedded Decision Support to Prevent Stroke in Patients with AF", is to improve thromboprophylaxis treatment decisions for patients with non-valvular AF and to increase awareness of the underutilization of appropriate thromboprophylaxis in the University of Cincinnati Health system, including vulnerable populations with health disparities. To achieve this objective, the investigators will implement and evaluate the effectiveness of an Atrial Fibrillation Decision Support Tool (AFDST), embedded within the UC Health electronic health record (EHR) that will: (a) identify at the point of care, patients who might benefit substantially from a change in their current thromboprophylaxis; (b) provide patient-tailored guidance to support decision-making; and (c) provide an opportunity to refer the patient to a pharmacist-staffed AF Thromboprophylaxis Shared Decision-Making consultation service. Overview of Study Design - The overarching goal is to improve the rate of "appropriate thromboprophylaxis" by eliminating system barriers through provision of appropriate decision support in the right place and at the right time, that improves provider and patient knowledge about AF-related stroke risks, bleeding risks, practice gaps in prevention, and how to think about balancing risks and benefits of anticoagulation therapy, and by improving patient engagement in decision-making. The investigators have designed interventions based on a conceptual model that attributes the gap between evidence and practice to the following issues: 1) provider knowledge, 2) patient understanding and engagement, 3) sociodemographic factors that create barriers to care and treatment, and 4) systems barriers such as time constraints for busy clinicians and inadequate electronic health record-integrated decision support. The investigators will achieve the overarching goal through two aims. The first aim will be addressed by a randomized controlled trial that examines two strategies - 1) AFDST without best practice advisory \[BPA\] (current state), or 2) AFDST with BPA and semi-automated order set to refer patients to an AF Thromboprophylaxis Shared Decision-Making Service. The investigators will use the RE-AIM framework for the evaluation of implementation studies to assess outcomes of effectiveness, reach, and adoption. The second aim is to evaluate the impact of shared decision-making tools and services. The investigators believe that a shared decision-making specialty service that utilizes an EHR-embedded Atrial Fibrillation Shared Decision Making Tool (AFSDM) tool will improve a number of metrics for quality care. These include, among others, decrease decisional conflict, improve patient satisfaction with decision-making, improve patient knowledge, and improve adherence with final shared treatment decisions. Methods - The first aim will be accomplished through a clinical study in which AF patients in the UC Health primary care network will be randomized into one of two study arms. Briefly, these arms are: 1) Atrial Fibrillation Decision-Support Tool (AFDST); 2) AFDST with addition of best practice advisory (BPA) and option to refer to shared decision-making consultation services. Patients will enter the study as their clinicians receive BPAs, or in the case of the first study arm, when BPAs would have been generated as clinicians open medical records of patients for whom current thromboprophylaxis is not optimal. The second aim will be accomplished through a pre/post study design evaluating the impact of shared decision-making tools and services. Patients will be consented and enrolled following their referral to the pharmacist-staffed AF shared decision-making service. Patients consenting to participation in this aspect of the study, will have a shared decision-making visit with one of the anticoagulation pharmacists. Information to be collected will include a number of validated measures of decision quality, patient engagement and confidence, and connection with the clinical team gathered prior to and at the conclusion of the shared decision-making visit.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
608

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 19, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 23, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 18, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 11, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 19, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 10, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

anticoagulationdecision sciencesclinical informaticsimplementation research

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • "Appropriate Thromboprophylaxis"

    The primary outcome of interest for aim 1 is effectiveness, measured as the percent of patients with "appropriate thromboprophylaxis" based on the AFDST recommendation. If oral anticoagulant therapy is recommended, current treatment with any oral anticoagulant agent will be considered concordant with recommendations. We will assess post-intervention treatment at the completion of the study (up to 18 months) to determine the proportion of patients in each study arm receiving "appropriate thromboprophylaxis."

    by study completion, up to 18 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Number of patients for whom BPA is generated divided by number of BPAs acknowledged by physician activation of AFDST.

    18 months

  • Number of clinicians receiving a BPA divided by number who acknowledge the BPA by activating AFDST.

    18 months

  • Strokes

    18 months

  • Major bleeds

    18 months

Study Arms (2)

Current State

NO INTERVENTION

Clinicians of patients randomized to this arm will have access to the Atrial Fibrillation Decision-Support Tool (AFDST) embedded in our EHR (as they do now), but will not receive BPAs alerting them to patients who might benefit significantly from a change in anticoagulation treatment.

AFDST with BPA

EXPERIMENTAL

Clinicians of patients randomized to this arm will receive BPAs when they are in the medical record of an AF patient who might gain significantly from a change in anticoagulation treatment. In addition, clinicians will have the ability to refer patients to a pharmacist-staffed AF Thromboprophylaxis Shared Decision-Making Service based in our Anticoagulation Clinic.

Other: Electronic Health Record Best Practice Advisory

Interventions

The AFDST is a decision support tool that is embedded in our electronic health record system. Currently, this is a passive tool that requires the clinician to launch the tool if an analysis is desired. The experimental arm of this study will add a best practice advisory (BPA) that will trigger when a clinician is in the medical record of an AF patient who might gain substantial benefit (survival and quality of life) if treatment were changed from the current anticoagulation plan, which might be no anticoagulant therapy.

AFDST with BPA

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (I48.x)

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of valvular heart disease (mitral valve disease (I05.x), aortic valve disease (I06.x), mitral and aortic valve disease (I08.x)), presence of prosthetic heart valve (Z95.2), or presence of xenogenic heart valve (Z95.3), or presence of other heart valve replacement (Z95.4).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Cincinnati Health System

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45257, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Eckman MH, Costea A, Attari M, Munjal J, Wise RE, Knochelmann C, Flaherty ML, Baker P, Ireton R, Harnett BM, Leonard AC, Steen D, Rose A, Kues J. Shared decision-making tool for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation - A feasibility study. Am Heart J. 2018 May;199:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

    PMID: 29754650BACKGROUND
  • Eckman MH, Costea A, Attari M, Munjal J, Wise RE, Knochelmann C, Flaherty ML, Baker P, Ireton R, Harnett BM, Leonard AC, Steen D, Rose A, Kues J. Atrial fibrillation decision support tool: Population perspective. Am Heart J. 2017 Dec;194:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

    PMID: 29223435BACKGROUND
  • Eckman MH, Lip GY, Wise RE, Speer B, Sullivan M, Walker N, Kissela B, Flaherty ML, Kleindorfer D, Baker P, Ireton R, Hoskins D, Harnett BM, Aguilar C, Leonard AC, Arduser L, Steen D, Costea A, Kues J. Impact of an Atrial Fibrillation Decision Support Tool on thromboprophylaxis for atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2016 Jun;176:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

    PMID: 27264216BACKGROUND
  • Shah SJ, Eckman MH, Aspberg S, Go AS, Singer DE. Effect of Variation in Published Stroke Rates on the Net Clinical Benefit of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 16;169(8):517-527. doi: 10.7326/M17-2762. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

    PMID: 30264130BACKGROUND
  • Eckman MH, Wise R, Knochelmann C, Mardis R, Wright S, Gummadi A, Dixon E, Becker R, Schauer DP, Flaherty ML, Costea A, Kleindorfer D, Ireton R, Baker P, Harnett BM, Adejare A, Leonard AC, Sucharew H, Costanzo A, Arduser L, Kues J. Electronic health record-embedded decision support to reduce stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation - Study protocol. Am Heart J. 2022 May;247:42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Jan 23.

    PMID: 35081360BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: For the first aim AF patients in our UC Health primary care network will be randomized into one of two study arms: 1) Atrial Fibrillation Decision-Support Tool (AFDST); 2) AFDST with addition of best practice advisory (BPA) and option to refer to shared decision-making consultation services. Patients will enter the study as their clinicians receive BPAs, or in the case of the first study arm, when BPAs would have been generated as clinicians open medical records of patients for whom current thromboprophylaxis is not optimal. The second aim is a pre/post study evaluating the impact of shared decision-making tools and services. Patients consenting to participation in this aspect of the study, will have a shared decision-making visit with one of our anticoagulation pharmacists.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Clinical Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2019

First Posted

September 23, 2019

Study Start

November 18, 2020

Primary Completion

November 30, 2022

Study Completion

February 28, 2023

Last Updated

May 11, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations