Health Belief Model Based Nursing Interventions on Lymphedema Prevention
Effects of Health Belief Model Based Nursing Interventions Offered at Home Visits on Lymphedema Prevention in Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
72
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Aim: The study was performed to examine effects of Health Belief Model based nursing interventions given at home visits on prevention of lymphedema in women having breast surgery. Methods: The study had an experimental design. 72 women receiving radiotherapy after breast surgery, of whom 37 formed the intervention group and 35 formed the control group. The study had an experimental design. Data were collected with a personal information questionnaire, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (Q-DASH), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life for Breast Cancer 23 (EORTC QLQ-BR23), Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health (SUPPH), Arm Circumference Form at three home visits at three-month intervals. Hypotheses of the study
- Nurses can play an effective role in enabling women undergoing breast surgery to acquire behavior of lymphedema prevention. This may reduce treatment costs.
- Future research should evaluate collaborative models of care in general practice aimed at improving lymphedema prevention for women undergoing breast surgery.
- Policymakers should consider introducing funding measures for breast cancer survivors by nurses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started May 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2019
CompletedAugust 7, 2024
August 1, 2024
11 months
September 16, 2019
August 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score
Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score;Q-DASH is used to determine severities of disabilities in the upper extremities and benefits gained from treatment. It was adapted Turkish by Duger et al. and its cronbach's alpha was reported to be .91. It is a five-point likert scale and includes 11 questions. The score zero indicates lack of a disability and 100 the most severe disability.
6 months
Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health
Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health;SUPPH is a self-report scale created by Lev and Owen to evaluate self-efficacy of individuals in development of health promotion strategies. It was adapted Turkey by Akın and its Cronbach's alpha was reported to be .92. The scale consists of 29 items. The subscale stress reduction includes the items 1-10, making decision the items 11-13, positive attitude the items 14. Each item is scored from one to five:one corresponds to very little and five very much. The lowest and the highest scores for the scale are 29 and 145 respectively. Higher scores show higher levels of self-efficacy in self-care behavior 29.
6 months
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Scale for Breast Cancer 23
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Scale for Breast Cancer 23;EORTC QLQ-BR23 was adapted…by Demirci et al. The scale is composed of 23 items, a four-point scale and has two scales named FS and SS. Cronbach's alpha was reported to be .88 for the FS .66 for the SS. The FS has the subscales body image (items 39,40,41,42), sexual functions (items 44,45), sexual satisfaction (item 46), worry about the future (item 43). The SS has the subscales side effects of systematic treatment (items 31,32,33,34,36,37,38), breast symptoms (items 50,51,52,53), arm symptoms (items 47,48,49), worry about hair loss (item 35). The lowest and the highest scores for each scale are zero and 100 respectfully. Higher scores for the FS show a higher quality of life and higher scores for the SS indicate a poorer quality of life.
6 months
Arm Circumference Measurement Form
Arm Circumference Measurement Form;The form was made on four different sites on both arms:at the dorsum of the hand, the wrist, and 10cm below and above of the elbow. The difference more than 2cm between circumferences of the arms was considered as significant in terms of lymphedema.
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Nursing interventions (home visit and health education) group
EXPERIMENTALNursing interventions group: Home visit, health education At the Intervention group; the researcher made pretest (baseline measurements) before the nursing interventions at the first home visit. The researcher offered education and guide about prevention of lymphedema after the baseline measurements at the first home visit. Second and third home visits were made three and six months after the first visit. At the second and the third home visits, the measurements were repeated, and the nursing interventions were maintained in the direction of the patients' individual needs.
No Nursing interventions group
NO INTERVENTIONNo Nursing interventions group; the researcher administered the pretests at first home visit. The measurements were repeated in the third and sixth months after the first home visit. The researcher also given at the end of the sixth month, all of the nursing interventions, given to the intervention group, for the control group.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of primary breast cancer and having stage I, II and III
- Having axillary dissection
- Not having the diagnosis of lymphedema
- Receiving radiotherapy
- Volunteering to participate in the study
- Age over 18 years
- Female
- Residing in the city
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of bilateral breast cancer
- Open wound or infection in the upper extremities
- Musculoskeletal disorders preventing movements of the upper extremities
- Ongoing adjuvant systemic chemotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ayse Cal, Asst Prof
Ankara Medipol University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Zuhal Bahar, Prof
Koç University
- STUDY CHAIR
Ilknur Gorken, Prof
Dokuz Eylul University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The study had a single-blind, randomized controlled experimental design. To avoid bias, the participants were not told whether they were in the experimental or the control group.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2019
First Posted
September 23, 2019
Study Start
May 15, 2016
Primary Completion
April 15, 2017
Study Completion
July 13, 2017
Last Updated
August 7, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share