VATS Surgery Compared to Drainage in the Treatment of Pleural Empyema
FIVERVATS
Intrapleural Fibrinolysis and DNase Versus VATS for the Treatment of Pleural Empyema: a Randomized, Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
184
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Pleura empyema is a frequent disease with a high morbidity and a mortality rate of approximately 15%. Pleura empyema is characterized by the passage of three stages (I - III). The aim of treating the disease is to remove the infection and provide fully expansion of the lung. The initial treatment at the early stage of the disease (stage I) is simple drainage. In clinical practice, stages II and III are treated alike. Current standard treatment for these stages is drainage with ultrasound (ULS) -guided pigtail. Simultaneously with drainage, an intrapleural fibrinolyticum can be given. A potential better alternative is surgery in terms of Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS). The theoretical advantage of early surgery is that patients undergo rapid, definitive treatment. Furthermore, surgery can ensure optimal drain placement. How best to treat these patients (drainage or surgery) is still under clinical evaluation and depends to a great extent on local clinical practice. It is only to a limited extent based on scientific evidence. The aim of this study is to determine if there is a difference in outcome in patients diagnosed with stage II and stage III empyema who either receive primary VATS surgery or ULS guided drainage and intrapleural therapy (fibrinolytic (altaplasm) with DNase (Pulmozyne ®)) The primary outcome is Hospitalization time and secondary outcomes is e.g. mortality, health related costs and quality of life. The present study can thus provide new and highly relevant knowledge as well as change the treatment of these patients, both nationally and internationally. It is planned that a total of 184 patients will be included in the project. The study takes place as a collaboration between all four thoracic surgical departments and the major pulmonary medicine departments in Denmark. In addition, the study has international collaborators/consultants who will provide counselling in connection with the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2028
October 3, 2025
August 1, 2025
5 years
September 5, 2019
September 30, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Length of hospital stay
Admission time is defined as the time from first admission in the course of the hospitalization and to the completion of treatment defined as time of discharge from hospital without need of any additional invasive treatment.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Length of hospital stay in subgroups
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Length of hospital stay after commencement of intervention
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Days at home up to 30 days after intervention (DAH30) treatment
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
30-day and in-hospital mortality
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Proportion of patients where primary intervention could be considered as definitive treatment
30 days
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
VATS / surgical group
EXPERIMENTALThe VATS procedure must be completed as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after randomisation. The surgery is performed with the patient in a 90 degree sideways position, using general anesthesia. Access is obtained through one to three ports, followed by purification and possibly decortication, and insertion of one pleural drain (sizes 24 - 32F) at the end of surgery. 20 ml Marcain is used as local analgetic and applied at the incision sites or as a nerve block. In the VATS group, suction on drain (- 15 cm H20) is applied in the first day after the procedure. Operator must have relevant training and competencies corresponding to the specialist level within the relevant specialty and be registered and approved by the steering committee.
Drain and intrapleural therapy group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPigtail is applied as soon as possible and within 48 hours after randomisation. Drain placement is carried out using ULS. Operators (conductors of the procedure) must have relevant training and competencies corresponding to the specialist level within the relevant specialty and be approved by the steering committee to conduct the procedure. A pigtail catheter (minimum 10F) is inserted. Operator determines the size of drain and whether drain placement is done with one-step or Seldinger technic. The intrapleural therapy consists of treatment with the following two drugs: * intrapleural Actilyse® (alteplase) 10 mg twice daily for three days * intrapleural Pulmozyme® (DNase) 5 mg twice daily for three days
Interventions
Drainage with pigtail and Intrapleural therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or more on the day of hospitalization
- Must be able to provide informed consent
- Acute hospitalization within the last 48 hours
- Meeting diagnostic criteria for community acquired pleural infection using the following criteria:
- A clinical presentation compatible with pleural infection AND
- Has pleural fluid which is either:
- purulent pleural fluid or
- gram stain positive or
- culture positive or
- acidic with pH \< 7.2 or
- low pleural fluid glucose (\< 2 mmol/L) in the absence of accurate pH measurement or
- septated pleural fluid on ultrasound
You may not qualify if:
- Breastfeeding
- Declared terminally ill or a predicted survival of less than 3 months
- Previous intrathoracic surgery (within \<1 year on the same side of the thorax as where the parapneumonic effusion/pleural empyema is located
- Previously (within \<1 year) hospitalized with with complex parapneumonic effusion (stage II) or pleural empyema (stage III)
- Drainage during the current admission on the same side of the thorax (excluding diagnostic pleural puncture)
- Hospitalization within 7 days prior to current hospitalization
- Previous allergic reaction to alteplase or DNase
- Use of alteplase therapy contraindicated:
- Ongoing treatment with oral anticoagulant incl. new oral anticoagulants (e.g. warfarin (Marevan), Dabigatranetexilat (Pradaxa), Rivaroxaban (Xarelto), Apixaban (Eliquis), Endoxaban (Lixiana))
- Significant ongoing bleeding or within last six months
- Known haemorrhagic diathesis
- Previous or suspected intracranial hemorrhage
- Suspected subarachnoidal hemorrhage or condition following subarachnoidal hemorrhage from aneurysm
- All forms of damage to the central nervous system (e.g. cerebral tumors, aneurysm, intracranial / spinal surgery)
- Recent (within 10 days) cardiac resuscitation, birth, or perforation of non-compressible blood vessel (e.g. puncture of v. subclavia, v. jugularis)
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Thomas Decker Christensenlead
- Odense University Hospitalcollaborator
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarkcollaborator
- Aalborg University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
Odense University Hospital
Odense, Denmark
Related Publications (15)
Maskell NA, Davies CW, Nunn AJ, Hedley EL, Gleeson FV, Miller R, Gabe R, Rees GL, Peto TE, Woodhead MA, Lane DJ, Darbyshire JH, Davies RJ; First Multicenter Intrapleural Sepsis Trial (MIST1) Group. U.K. Controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase for pleural infection. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 3;352(9):865-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042473.
PMID: 15745977BACKGROUNDDavies HE, Davies RJ, Davies CW; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii41-53. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.137000. No abstract available.
PMID: 20696693BACKGROUNDMolnar TF. Current surgical treatment of thoracic empyema in adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Sep;32(3):422-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.05.028. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
PMID: 17646107BACKGROUNDTokuda Y, Matsushima D, Stein GH, Miyagi S. Intrapleural fibrinolytic agents for empyema and complicated parapneumonic effusions: a meta-analysis. Chest. 2006 Mar;129(3):783-90. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.3.783.
PMID: 16537882BACKGROUNDHooper CE, Edey AJ, Wallis A, Clive AO, Morley A, White P, Medford AR, Harvey JE, Darby M, Zahan-Evans N, Maskell NA. Pleural irrigation trial (PIT): a randomised controlled trial of pleural irrigation with normal saline versus standard care in patients with pleural infection. Eur Respir J. 2015 Aug;46(2):456-63. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00147214. Epub 2015 May 28.
PMID: 26022948BACKGROUNDRahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, Teoh R, Arnold A, Mackinlay C, Peckham D, Davies CW, Ali N, Kinnear W, Bentley A, Kahan BC, Wrightson JM, Davies HE, Hooper CE, Lee YC, Hedley EL, Crosthwaite N, Choo L, Helm EJ, Gleeson FV, Nunn AJ, Davies RJ. Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 11;365(6):518-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012740.
PMID: 21830966BACKGROUNDScarci M, Abah U, Solli P, Page A, Waller D, van Schil P, Melfi F, Schmid RA, Athanassiadi K, Sousa Uva M, Cardillo G. EACTS expert consensus statement for surgical management of pleural empyema. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Nov;48(5):642-53. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv272. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
PMID: 26254467BACKGROUNDBagheri R, Tavassoli A, Haghi SZ, Attaran D, Sadrizadeh A, Asnaashari A, Basiri R, Salehi M, Moghadam KA, Tabari A, Sheibani S. The role of thoracoscopic debridement in the treatment of parapneumonic empyema. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2013 Aug;21(4):443-6. doi: 10.1177/0218492312466858. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
PMID: 24570527BACKGROUNDRedden MD, Chin TY, van Driel ML. Surgical versus non-surgical management for pleural empyema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 17;3(3):CD010651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010651.pub2.
PMID: 28304084BACKGROUNDKoppurapu V, Meena N. A review of the management of complex para-pneumonic effusion in adults. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(7):2135-2141. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.21.
PMID: 28840015BACKGROUNDBishay M, Short M, Shah K, Nagraj S, Arul S, Parikh D, Jawaheer G. Efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in managing childhood empyema: a large single-centre study. J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Feb;44(2):337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.083.
PMID: 19231530BACKGROUNDRavn, J. Should all patients with pleural emphyema be referred to a thoracic operation? Dan. Med. J. 179, V69273 (2017).
BACKGROUNDPsallidas I, Yousuf A, Talwar A, Hallifax RJ, Mishra EK, Corcoran JP, Ali N, Rahman NM. Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures in pleural interventions. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017 Jul 3;4(1):e000171. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000171. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28883922BACKGROUNDRahman NM, Kahan BC, Miller RF, Gleeson FV, Nunn AJ, Maskell NA. A clinical score (RAPID) to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection. Chest. 2014 Apr;145(4):848-855. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1558.
PMID: 24264558BACKGROUNDChristensen TD, Bendixen M, Skaarup SH, Jensen JU, Petersen RH, Christensen M, Licht P, Neckelmann K, Bibby BM, Moller LB, Bodtger U, Borg MH, Saghir Z, Langfeldt S, Harders SMW, Bedawi EO, Naidu B, Rahman N, Laursen CB. Intrapleural fibrinolysis and DNase versus video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of pleural empyema (FIVERVATS): protocol for a randomised, controlled trial - surgery as first-line treatment. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e054236. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054236.
PMID: 35264347DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian B Laursen, MD, PhD
Odense University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian B Laursen, MD, PhD
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant, Professor, MD, DMSc., Ph.D
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2019
First Posted
September 19, 2019
Study Start
October 30, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 30, 2028
Last Updated
October 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- After completion of the study - after / during the publication process
- Access Criteria
- Mail to the principle investigator
All data can be shared , but the data will not be person attributable, so the individual patient can not be identified