NCT04090359

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to the compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of a dual mobility bearing versus a single bearing design with the use of a large femoral head (36mm or 40mm). We hypothesize the use of dual-mobility components in revision THA will be associated with a lower dislocation rate in the first year following surgery.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
322

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
127mo left

Started Sep 2017

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress45%
Sep 2017Nov 2036

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2017

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2019

Completed
7.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2026

Expected
10 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2036

Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

9.2 years

First QC Date

September 11, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Prosthetic Dislocation

    The rate of prosthetic dislocation between the two cohorts will be measured at standard postoperative clinic visits

    6 weeks

  • Prosthetic Dislocation

    The rate of prosthetic dislocation between the two cohorts will be measured at standard postoperative clinic visits

    3 months

  • Prosthetic Dislocation

    The rate of prosthetic dislocation between the two cohorts will be measured at standard postoperative clinic visits

    2 years

  • Prosthetic Dislocation

    The rate of prosthetic dislocation between the two cohorts will be measured at standard postoperative clinic visits

    5 years

  • Prosthetic Dislocation

    The rate of prosthetic dislocation between the two cohorts will be measured at standard postoperative clinic visits

    10 years

  • Prosthetic Dislocation

    The rate of prosthetic dislocation between the two cohorts will be measured at standard postoperative clinic visits

    15 years

  • Prosthetic Dislocation

    The rate of prosthetic dislocation between the two cohorts will be measured at standard postoperative clinic visits

    20 years

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Complications

    up to 20 years after the patient is discharged from the hospital

  • Routine radiographs assess for loosening and proper component placement

    6 weeks

  • Routine radiographs assess for loosening and proper component placement

    3 months

  • Routine radiographs assess for loosening and proper component placement

    2 years

  • Routine radiographs assess for loosening and proper component placement

    5 years

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Dual Mobility

EXPERIMENTAL

If patients are randomized to the dual mobility cohort, they will receive a dual mobility prosthesis at the surgeon's discretion. All surgeries will be performed via the posterior approach, per the participating surgeon's usual standard. Patients will be on postoperative hip precautions for 6 weeks, per departmental protocol. No braces will be utilized.

Device: Dual Mobility Implant

Conventional, Single-bearing hip implant

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

If patients are randomized to the conventional, single bearing cohort, surgeons will use their preferred implant design at their discretion using a 36 or 40mm head, depending on the diameter of the cup and manufacturer specifications. All surgeries will be performed via the posterior approach, per the participating surgeon's usual standard. Patients will be on postoperative hip precautions for 6 weeks, per departmental protocol. No braces will be utilized.

Device: Conventional, single-bearing implant

Interventions

Patients in this intervention will receive a dual mobility implant

Dual Mobility

Patients in this intervention will receive a conventional, single-bearing implant

Conventional, Single-bearing hip implant

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Any patient older than 18 years of age scheduled for a revision THA, including revision of both components, conversion of a hip resurfacing to THA, conversion of a hemiarthroplasty to THA, and revision of single components which allow implantation of dual-mobility bearings. In addition, patients undergoing reimplantation of a total hip arthroplasty following a two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection will also be included. Only patients with an acetabular shell diameter capable of accommodating at least a 36mm femoral head will be included.

You may not qualify if:

  • Less than 18 years of age, primary THA,
  • conversion of non-arthroplasty femoral neck fracture fixation to THA,
  • patients unwilling to participate.
  • patients where the surgeon makes the intraoperative decision to use a constrained liner will be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

New York University Medical Center

New York, New York, 10003, United States

NOT YET RECRUITING

Rothman Institute

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Weintraub MT, DeBenedetti A, Nam D, Darrith B, Baker CM, Waren D, Schwarzkopf R, Courtney PM, Della Valle CJ. Dual-Mobility versus Large Femoral Heads in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7S):S206-S210. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.089. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hip Dislocation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DislocationsJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesWounds and InjuriesHip Injuries

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial with two groups: revision THA with dual mobility components vs revision THA with large head, single bearing designs (36mm and 40mm).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2019

First Posted

September 16, 2019

Study Start

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2036

Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations