Non-mass Enhancement in Breast MRI
Patterns of Non-mass Enhancement of Breast MRI Using the BI-RADS Lexicon Fifth Edition With Histopathologic Correlation
1 other identifier
observational
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been proven to be the most sensitive method in detection of breast cancer with sensitivity reaching 68-100%. The most frequent indication for breast MRI is screening for high-risk patients with a 20% or greater lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Other indications include; assessment of extent of disease and screening of the contralateral breast in patients who are newly diagnosed with primary breast cancer. Evaluation of residual disease post Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) with positive margins, loco-regional recurrence detection, as well as response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are also well visualized by breast MRI. Furthermore, assessment of inconclusive mammography finding without a sonographic correlate, suspicious nipple discharge without a sono-mammographic or galacto-graphic correlate and evaluation of metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy in case of unknown primary tumor are all indications in which breast MRI has shown high sensitivity. Breast MRI also helps in identifying multifocal/multicentric or contralateral breast malignancies which was not detected by conventional imaging. Moreover, MRI gives more accurate data about local extension of invasive breast cancer and in situ tumors than other conventional modalities. In some patients newly diagnosed to have cancer breast, breast MRI is able to detect additional lesions that has not been found in mammography or breast ultrasound in 6 - 34% in the ipsilateral breast and 3 - 5% in the contralateral breast. These additional breast lesions are classified into focus, mass, and non-mass enhancement (NME) on MRI. Non-mass enhancement (NME) is defined as an enhancing abnormality that is not associated with the three-dimension volume of a mass, shape and outlining, and they are separate from the Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE). The fifth edition of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon has erased some ambiguities, and modified terminologies from the fourth edition to provide more precise evaluation in descriptions of the distribution and Internal Enhancement Patterns (IEPs) of NME, contributes in quality assurance, better communication with physicians, and enhances patient care. For morphological assessment of NME, distribution is described as focal, linear, segmental, regional, multiple regions, and diffuse. And the IEPs are characterized as homogeneous, heterogeneous, clumped, and clustered ring. NME may be benign as Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia (PASH), apocrine metaplasia and radiation effect; high risk such as Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, radial scar or complex sclerosing lesion, or malignant as Ductal Carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC), and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2021
CompletedOctober 16, 2024
October 1, 2024
1 year
September 6, 2019
October 15, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patterns of non-mass enhancement on breast MRI
To estimate the various patterns of NME using the BI-RADS lexicon fifth edition with histopathologic correlation; to evaluate their clinical significance.
Within one year; from March 2020 to March 2021
Interventions
Breast MRI
Eligibility Criteria
Female patients with mean age 50 ± 17
You may qualify if:
- all female with mean age 50 ± 17 having breast MRI
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications of MRI as pacemakers, aneurysmal clipping, retained metallic foreign bodies, or claustrophobic patients
- Pregnant women especially in the first trimester.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut University Hospitals
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
Related Publications (9)
Park SY, Han BK, Ko ES, Ko EY, Cho EY. Additional lesions seen in magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer patients: the role of second-look ultrasound and imaging-guided interventions. Ultrasonography. 2019 Jan;38(1):76-82. doi: 10.14366/usg.18002. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
PMID: 30103597BACKGROUNDShin K, Phalak K, Hamame A, Whitman GJ. Interpretation of Breast MRI Utilizing the BI-RADS Fifth Edition Lexicon: How Are We Doing and Where Are We Headed? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2017 Jan-Feb;46(1):26-34. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
PMID: 26826797BACKGROUNDHa GW, Yi MS, Lee BK, Youn HJ, Jung SH. Clinical outcome of magnetic resonance imaging-detected additional lesions in breast cancer patients. J Breast Cancer. 2011 Sep;14(3):213-8. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2011.14.3.213. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
PMID: 22031803BACKGROUNDCho YH, Cho KR, Park EK, Seo BK, Woo OH, Cho SB, Bae JW. Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast. Iran J Radiol. 2016 Jan 23;13(1):e30909. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.30909. eCollection 2016 Jan.
PMID: 27127579BACKGROUNDLee SM, Nam KJ, Choo KS, Kim JY, Jeong DW, Kim HY, Kim JY. Patterns of malignant non-mass enhancement on 3-T breast MRI help predict invasiveness: using the BI-RADS lexicon fifth edition. Acta Radiol. 2018 Nov;59(11):1292-1299. doi: 10.1177/0284185118759139. Epub 2018 May 14.
PMID: 29758996BACKGROUNDYang QX, Ji X, Feng LL, Zheng L, Zhou XQ, Wu Q, Chen X. Significant MRI indicators of malignancy for breast non-mass enhancement. J Xray Sci Technol. 2017;25(6):1033-1044. doi: 10.3233/XST-17311.
PMID: 29154312BACKGROUNDMachida Y, Shimauchi A, Tozaki M, Kuroki Y, Yoshida T, Fukuma E. Descriptors of Malignant Non-mass Enhancement of Breast MRI: Their Correlation to the Presence of Invasion. Acad Radiol. 2016 Jun;23(6):687-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
PMID: 26976623BACKGROUNDD'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, et al. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology; 2013.
BACKGROUNDChadashvili T, Ghosh E, Fein-Zachary V, Mehta TS, Venkataraman S, Dialani V, Slanetz PJ. Nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: review of patterns with radiologic-pathologic correlation and discussion of management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):219-27. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12656.
PMID: 25539260BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2019
First Posted
September 10, 2019
Study Start
March 1, 2020
Primary Completion
March 1, 2021
Study Completion
September 1, 2021
Last Updated
October 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10