Medication Review in Women With Depression and Anxiety
Assessing the Impact of Medication Management Review Service for Females Diagnosed With Depression and Anxiety
1 other identifier
interventional
73
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study sought to assess the impact of the MMR service on identifying and resolving TRPs, improving adherence, depression and anxiety scores in females diagnosed with depression and anxiety in Jordan
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2019
CompletedSeptember 9, 2019
September 1, 2019
5 months
September 2, 2019
September 6, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the effect of the medication management review service delivered to females living in Jordan and diagnosed with depression and anxiety
the medication management review service will be measured by the reduction of treatment related number after providing the service
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient's satisfaction with the medication management review service
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll pharmacist level counseling and education regarding treatment, adherence and self-care activities were delivered to the active group patients only (planned to take 15 minutes). Patient level TRPs (any TRP that could be resolved via patient education and counseling) were resolved directly with the patient by the clinical pharmacist. A letter with the identified TRPs (prioritized from most important to least important) for each patient in the active group was sent to the patient's psychiatrist by the researcher in sealed envelopes. The psychiatrist either accepted or rejected the recommendations. In case the recommendations were accepted, the psychiatrist implemented the recommended changes. Patients were informed by a phone call by the pharmacist to visit their psychiatrist soon after the recommendations were approved for the changes to be applied. If the recommendations were rejected, the psychiatrist stated the reason of rejection and discussed it with the pharmacist.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group patients also underwent the baseline interview with the researcher at the psychiatric clinic, TRPs were identified and documented. No intervention was provided by the pharmacist and no letter was sent to the patients' psychiatrists. In case a patient was found to have a life-threatening TRP, the patient was excluded from the study and reported to the psychiatrist due to ethical considerations. After study completion, all patients in the control group received the MMR service, and a letter with their TRPs and recommendations to resolve them was sent by the pharmacist to their psychologist
Interventions
The researcher screened each completed an MMR template and verified that all information in each patient template was complete. A classification system was then used to identify the TRPs which either actually or potentially interfered with the clinical outcomes for each patient.\[19\] This system was explained in detail and applied successfully in many previous studies.\[10, 14, 20\] The researcher then identified TRPs for each patient in both groups using evidence-based medicine. The TRPs including unneeded drug treatment, untreated condition/s, efficacy/effectiveness issues, safety issues, inadequate knowledge, inappropriate adherence to pharmacological therapy, inappropriate adherence to self-care activities and miscellaneous problems.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Jordanian females or residents in Jordan for the last 12 months and planning to stay in Jordan for 6 months (the study follow-up period),
- above the age of 18 years
- diagnosed with depression and/or anxiety for at least 4 weeks duration
- taking medications for depression and/or anxiety
You may not qualify if:
- presence of a cognitive problem or sensory impairment which may prevent communication with the patient (reported by the patient's psychiatrist)
- being not able to speak or write Arabic (reported by the patient)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- This single-blind parallel randomized controlled trial
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2019
First Posted
September 9, 2019
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 10, 2017
Last Updated
September 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09