NCT04082871

Brief Summary

This study sought to assess the impact of the MMR service on identifying and resolving TRPs, improving adherence, depression and anxiety scores in females diagnosed with depression and anxiety in Jordan

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
73

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2017

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 10, 2017

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 2, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 9, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

September 2, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 6, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Medication management review servicePharmaceutical careClinical pharmacist

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate the effect of the medication management review service delivered to females living in Jordan and diagnosed with depression and anxiety

    the medication management review service will be measured by the reduction of treatment related number after providing the service

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient's satisfaction with the medication management review service

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All pharmacist level counseling and education regarding treatment, adherence and self-care activities were delivered to the active group patients only (planned to take 15 minutes). Patient level TRPs (any TRP that could be resolved via patient education and counseling) were resolved directly with the patient by the clinical pharmacist. A letter with the identified TRPs (prioritized from most important to least important) for each patient in the active group was sent to the patient's psychiatrist by the researcher in sealed envelopes. The psychiatrist either accepted or rejected the recommendations. In case the recommendations were accepted, the psychiatrist implemented the recommended changes. Patients were informed by a phone call by the pharmacist to visit their psychiatrist soon after the recommendations were approved for the changes to be applied. If the recommendations were rejected, the psychiatrist stated the reason of rejection and discussed it with the pharmacist.

Other: Medication management review

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control group patients also underwent the baseline interview with the researcher at the psychiatric clinic, TRPs were identified and documented. No intervention was provided by the pharmacist and no letter was sent to the patients' psychiatrists. In case a patient was found to have a life-threatening TRP, the patient was excluded from the study and reported to the psychiatrist due to ethical considerations. After study completion, all patients in the control group received the MMR service, and a letter with their TRPs and recommendations to resolve them was sent by the pharmacist to their psychologist

Other: Medication management review

Interventions

The researcher screened each completed an MMR template and verified that all information in each patient template was complete. A classification system was then used to identify the TRPs which either actually or potentially interfered with the clinical outcomes for each patient.\[19\] This system was explained in detail and applied successfully in many previous studies.\[10, 14, 20\] The researcher then identified TRPs for each patient in both groups using evidence-based medicine. The TRPs including unneeded drug treatment, untreated condition/s, efficacy/effectiveness issues, safety issues, inadequate knowledge, inappropriate adherence to pharmacological therapy, inappropriate adherence to self-care activities and miscellaneous problems.

ControlIntervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsFemales diagnosed with depression and/or anxiety and attending the psychiatric clinics at Jordan University Hospital (JUH)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Jordanian females or residents in Jordan for the last 12 months and planning to stay in Jordan for 6 months (the study follow-up period),
  • above the age of 18 years
  • diagnosed with depression and/or anxiety for at least 4 weeks duration
  • taking medications for depression and/or anxiety

You may not qualify if:

  • presence of a cognitive problem or sensory impairment which may prevent communication with the patient (reported by the patient's psychiatrist)
  • being not able to speak or write Arabic (reported by the patient)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DepressionAnxiety DisordersPatient Compliance

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorMental DisordersPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth Behavior

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
This single-blind parallel randomized controlled trial
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Following recruitment, participants were randomized into two groups (1:1 randomization), active and control, using the computer-generated randomization program (www.randomization.com). The researcher generated the allocation sequence, and assigned the participants to their group. Participant who came into the clinic during the clinic's working hours (Sunday to Thursday, from 9 am to 1 pm) were approached consecutively and allocated to the active or control group. Participants were not aware of which study group they were assigned to; only the researcher was aware of each patient's group assignment. Participants in the active and control groups completed a baseline and follow-up (3 months from baseline) visits at the same outpatient psychiatric clinic with the researcher conducting the interview using the study tool to complete the MMR process.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2019

First Posted

September 9, 2019

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion

January 1, 2017

Study Completion

January 10, 2017

Last Updated

September 9, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09