Sedation Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam in Critically Ill Ventilated Children
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is a significant lack of adequately powered randomized clinical trial (RCT) data to determine the comparative safety and effectiveness of sedative treatments in pediatric patients. In many centres the standard of care for sedation in pediatric critical care unit (PCCU) patients includes the use of benzodiazepines despite the known negative effects of increased patient agitation and delirium, which can contribute to longer PCCU and hospital length of stay (LOS). The use of an alternative sedative, dexmedetomidine may reduce negative effects in this population. As such, the investigators plan to conduct a well designed comparative RCT to determine the most effective and safest sedative in this vulnerable population utilizing clinical assessments of sedation levels and delirium instance, electroencephalography (EEG) analysis and patient important outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2021
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 8, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2024
CompletedDecember 11, 2023
December 1, 2023
3.2 years
August 28, 2019
December 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Target Sedation Range
The percentage of time spent within target sedation range, defined as COMFORT Behaviour Scale score of 11-22, which will be assessed at minimum every 4 hours.
Up to 14 days post-randomization
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Delirium
Up to 14 days post-randomization
Delirium
Up to 14 days post-randomization
Delirium
Up to 14 days post-randomization
Delirium
Up to 14 days post-randomization
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Up to 28 days post-randomization
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Economic Analysis
Up to 90 days post-randomization
Study Arms (2)
Dexmedetomidine
ACTIVE COMPARATORMidazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Precedex, dexmedetomidine hydrochloride, IV, 4mcg/mL, infusion duration determined by the clinical care team
Midazolam, IV, 5mg/mL (for patients more than 10kg), 1mg/mL (for patients 2-10kg), infusion duration determined by the clinical care team
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age is 1 month to 18 years inclusive
- The patient is intubated and is expected to remain intubated for at least the next 48 hours
- The patient has not been receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours
- The patient must already be receiving an opioid infusion per PCCU Guidelines for Sedation \& Analgesia for Procedures Outside O.R. and need additional sedation.
You may not qualify if:
- Admission is a consequence of suspected or proven drug overdose
- Patient is receiving dialysis
- Known pregnancy or lactation
- Neuromuscular blockade other than for intubation
- General anesthesia in the 24 hours prior to study initiation
- An acquired Central Nervous System (CNS) condition (i.e. encephalitis, traumatic brain injury) resulting in ongoing dysfunction or an acquired condition resulting in ongoing dysfunction
- Acute hepatitis or severe liver disease
- Known history of sensitivity to midazolam and/or dexmedetomidine or their constituents
- Systolic blood pressure (SBP) below 5th percentile for two consecutive measurements
- Heart rate (HR) below 5th percentile for two consecutive measurements
- Death is deemed to be imminent or inevitable during the admission and either the intensivist or substitute decision maker is not committed to full active resuscitation
- Previous enrollment into the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Douglas Fraserlead
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital - London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Douglas D Fraser, MD., PhD
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Paediatric Intensivist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2019
First Posted
September 9, 2019
Study Start
June 8, 2021
Primary Completion
September 1, 2024
Study Completion
September 1, 2024
Last Updated
December 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share