Electronic Symptom Follow-up of Cancer Patients
Follow-up of Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy or Targeted Therapy by Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes-tool
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Use of ePROs in oncological care have resulted in improvement of QoL, decreased ER visits, and improvement of overall survival. Furthermore, ePRO follow-up resulted in better QoL, improved ECOG status and more active cancer treatments at disease relapse, and improved survival among cancer survivals. The current study investigates electronic patient reported outcome tool in the follow-up of cancer patients receiving chemotherapies or targeted therapies. The aims of the current study are: 1) The number of alerts triggered by Kaiku Cancer medical treatment side-effects questionnaire and their correlation to treatment side-effects, other relevant medical events, tumor progression, and survival 2) Changes in Kaiku QLQ-C30 QoL questionnaire and their correlation to cancer treatment response, side-effects, other relevant medical event or survival 3) Patient compliance to Kaiku ePRO surveillance during treatment period according to response rates of Patient experience survey, Kaiku Cancer medical treatment side-effects questionnaire and Kaiku QLQ-C30 QoL questionnaire In addition, in the CRC (colorectal cancer) cohort:
- 1.Integration of laboratory values to patient reported symptoms when prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle
- 2.Number of phone calls related to prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle
- 3.Unscheduled doctor appointments in oncology unit
- 4.ER visits
- 5.Days in hospitalization
- 6.Unscheduled investigations in health care
- 7.Development of peripheral neurotoxicity
- 8.The number of chemotherapy dose reductions
- 9.The number of chemotherapy delays
- 10.Health care user experience survey
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable cancer
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable cancer
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2022
CompletedAugust 29, 2025
August 1, 2025
4.4 years
September 4, 2019
August 22, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Change in the spectrum of patient reported symptoms
Percentages of patient reported symptoms using KaikuHealth 15 symptom e-questionnaire. Individual questions evaluate the presence of a specific symptom e.g. nausea. Questions are answered yes or no.
At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks
Change in Patient reported symptom severity
Percentages of patient reported symptoms and their severity according NCI-CTCAE by KaikuHealth algorithm
At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks
Change in the number of triggered alerts by the tool
Number of triggered alerts by the tool and their correlation to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events in percentages or survival.
At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks
Changes in Quality of Life according to QLQ-C30 Summary scores
The correlation of the Summary score of QLQ-C30 to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, or other medical events or survival. The Core Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) is a validated cancer health-related quality-of-life questionnaire that includes five function domains (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive), eight symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss), as well as global health/quality of life and financial impact. Subjects respond on a four-point-scale from "not at all" to "very much" for most items. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale. For the functioning scales and global QoL higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales higher scores indicate higher symptom burden. The summary score of QLQ-C30 is calculated from the mean of 13 of 15 QLQ-C30 scales (the Global Quality of Life scale and the Financial Impact scale are not included).
At baseline, and at 4, 8, and 12weeks
Correlation between changes in different symptoms and their severity to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events, or survival
Correlation between different patient reported symptoms and their severity to treatment side-effects, cancer progression or other medical events in percentages or survival
At 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks
Changes in Patient compliance Questionnaire
Patient compliance using KaikuHealth e-questionnaire addressing usability (easiness to use from scale: very easy to very difficult; need of assistance to use the program: yes/no; how understandable are questions in symptom questionnaire from scale: totally agree to totally disagree) and user experience (use of the ePRO tool will better your cancer care: yes-no, do not know; use of the ePRO tool has been useful: yes-no-do not know; would you recommend the ePRO tool for cancer care: yes-no-do not know). Analysis is done on percentages of each answer choice at specific time point(s).
At 4, 8, and 12weeks
Changes in patient compliance according to answering rate to symptom questionnaires
Patient compliance using response rates (within one week) to symptom questionnaires in percentages from sent requests
At 4, 8, and 12weeks
Change in patient compliance according to answering rates to QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Patient compliance using response rates to QLQ-C30 questionnaires (within one week) in percentages from sent requests. The QLQ-C30 questionnaire includes five function domains (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive), eight symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss), as well as global health/quality of life and financial impact. Subjects respond on a four-point-scale from "not at all" to "very much" for most items. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale. For the functioning scales and global QoL higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales higher scores indicate higher symptom burden. The summary score of QLQ-C30 is calculated from the mean of 13 of 15 QLQ-C30 scales (the Global Quality of Life scale and the Financial Impact scale are not included).
At 4, 8, and 12weeks
Other Outcomes (10)
Integration of laboratory values to patient reported symptoms when prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle in the CRC cohort
At 2-3 weeks cycle upon chemotherapy dosing schema during the treatment phase of the trial
Number of phone calls related to prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle in the CRC cohort
At 2-3 weeks cycle upon chemotherapy dosing schema during the treatment phase of the trial
Unscheduled doctor appointments in oncology unit in the CRC cohort
During the treatment phase of the trial or up tp 24 weeks
- +7 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Electronic follow-up
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Electronic patient reported outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent prior to any study procedure
- Advanced breast, lung, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer
- New cancer medical treatment, chemotherapy or targeted therapy initiated within -/+ 2 weeks from signed consent
- Age ≥18y
- ECOG 0-2
- CRC cohort: Patients with adjuvant treatment, or first or second line of treatment for metastatic disease
- Patient compliant with study procedures
You may not qualify if:
- Initiation of new cancer medical treatment \> 2 wks from signed consent
- Any medical condition that the Investigator considers significant to compromise the safety of the patient or that impairs the interpretation of study assessments
- No internet access/email
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, Finland
Vaasa Central Hospital
Vaasa, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- adjuvant professor, medical oncologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2019
First Posted
September 9, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
May 31, 2022
Study Completion
May 31, 2022
Last Updated
August 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share