NCT04081558

Brief Summary

Use of ePROs in oncological care have resulted in improvement of QoL, decreased ER visits, and improvement of overall survival. Furthermore, ePRO follow-up resulted in better QoL, improved ECOG status and more active cancer treatments at disease relapse, and improved survival among cancer survivals. The current study investigates electronic patient reported outcome tool in the follow-up of cancer patients receiving chemotherapies or targeted therapies. The aims of the current study are: 1) The number of alerts triggered by Kaiku Cancer medical treatment side-effects questionnaire and their correlation to treatment side-effects, other relevant medical events, tumor progression, and survival 2) Changes in Kaiku QLQ-C30 QoL questionnaire and their correlation to cancer treatment response, side-effects, other relevant medical event or survival 3) Patient compliance to Kaiku ePRO surveillance during treatment period according to response rates of Patient experience survey, Kaiku Cancer medical treatment side-effects questionnaire and Kaiku QLQ-C30 QoL questionnaire In addition, in the CRC (colorectal cancer) cohort:

  1. 1.Integration of laboratory values to patient reported symptoms when prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle
  2. 2.Number of phone calls related to prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle
  3. 3.Unscheduled doctor appointments in oncology unit
  4. 4.ER visits
  5. 5.Days in hospitalization
  6. 6.Unscheduled investigations in health care
  7. 7.Development of peripheral neurotoxicity
  8. 8.The number of chemotherapy dose reductions
  9. 9.The number of chemotherapy delays
  10. 10.Health care user experience survey

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
43

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2018

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 4, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2019

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

August 29, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

September 4, 2019

Last Update Submit

August 22, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Change in the spectrum of patient reported symptoms

    Percentages of patient reported symptoms using KaikuHealth 15 symptom e-questionnaire. Individual questions evaluate the presence of a specific symptom e.g. nausea. Questions are answered yes or no.

    At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

  • Change in Patient reported symptom severity

    Percentages of patient reported symptoms and their severity according NCI-CTCAE by KaikuHealth algorithm

    At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

  • Change in the number of triggered alerts by the tool

    Number of triggered alerts by the tool and their correlation to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events in percentages or survival.

    At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

  • Changes in Quality of Life according to QLQ-C30 Summary scores

    The correlation of the Summary score of QLQ-C30 to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, or other medical events or survival. The Core Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) is a validated cancer health-related quality-of-life questionnaire that includes five function domains (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive), eight symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss), as well as global health/quality of life and financial impact. Subjects respond on a four-point-scale from "not at all" to "very much" for most items. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale. For the functioning scales and global QoL higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales higher scores indicate higher symptom burden. The summary score of QLQ-C30 is calculated from the mean of 13 of 15 QLQ-C30 scales (the Global Quality of Life scale and the Financial Impact scale are not included).

    At baseline, and at 4, 8, and 12weeks

  • Correlation between changes in different symptoms and their severity to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events, or survival

    Correlation between different patient reported symptoms and their severity to treatment side-effects, cancer progression or other medical events in percentages or survival

    At 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

  • Changes in Patient compliance Questionnaire

    Patient compliance using KaikuHealth e-questionnaire addressing usability (easiness to use from scale: very easy to very difficult; need of assistance to use the program: yes/no; how understandable are questions in symptom questionnaire from scale: totally agree to totally disagree) and user experience (use of the ePRO tool will better your cancer care: yes-no, do not know; use of the ePRO tool has been useful: yes-no-do not know; would you recommend the ePRO tool for cancer care: yes-no-do not know). Analysis is done on percentages of each answer choice at specific time point(s).

    At 4, 8, and 12weeks

  • Changes in patient compliance according to answering rate to symptom questionnaires

    Patient compliance using response rates (within one week) to symptom questionnaires in percentages from sent requests

    At 4, 8, and 12weeks

  • Change in patient compliance according to answering rates to QLQ-C30 questionnaire

    Patient compliance using response rates to QLQ-C30 questionnaires (within one week) in percentages from sent requests. The QLQ-C30 questionnaire includes five function domains (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive), eight symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss), as well as global health/quality of life and financial impact. Subjects respond on a four-point-scale from "not at all" to "very much" for most items. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale. For the functioning scales and global QoL higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales higher scores indicate higher symptom burden. The summary score of QLQ-C30 is calculated from the mean of 13 of 15 QLQ-C30 scales (the Global Quality of Life scale and the Financial Impact scale are not included).

    At 4, 8, and 12weeks

Other Outcomes (10)

  • Integration of laboratory values to patient reported symptoms when prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle in the CRC cohort

    At 2-3 weeks cycle upon chemotherapy dosing schema during the treatment phase of the trial

  • Number of phone calls related to prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle in the CRC cohort

    At 2-3 weeks cycle upon chemotherapy dosing schema during the treatment phase of the trial

  • Unscheduled doctor appointments in oncology unit in the CRC cohort

    During the treatment phase of the trial or up tp 24 weeks

  • +7 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Electronic follow-up

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Electronic patient reported outcomes tool

Interventions

Electronic patient reported outcomes

Electronic follow-up

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Written informed consent prior to any study procedure
  • Advanced breast, lung, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer
  • New cancer medical treatment, chemotherapy or targeted therapy initiated within -/+ 2 weeks from signed consent
  • Age ≥18y
  • ECOG 0-2
  • CRC cohort: Patients with adjuvant treatment, or first or second line of treatment for metastatic disease
  • Patient compliant with study procedures

You may not qualify if:

  • Initiation of new cancer medical treatment \> 2 wks from signed consent
  • Any medical condition that the Investigator considers significant to compromise the safety of the patient or that impairs the interpretation of study assessments
  • No internet access/email

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Oulu University Hospital

Oulu, Finland

Location

Vaasa Central Hospital

Vaasa, Finland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
adjuvant professor, medical oncologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2019

First Posted

September 9, 2019

Study Start

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion

May 31, 2022

Study Completion

May 31, 2022

Last Updated

August 29, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations