Rigorous Evaluation of High School FLASH
1 other identifier
interventional
1,597
1 country
1
Brief Summary
High School FLASH is a 15-session comprehensive sexual health curriculum designed for classroom settings in grades 9 to 12. The basis of High School FLASH is a public health approach to behavior change. The primary strategy used in the FLASH curriculum for preventing teen pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and sexual violence is to address student behaviors and attitudes. To this end, FLASH uses a harm reduction and behavior change framework, implements best practices as outlined in the research on effective programs, addresses risk and protective factors for program goals, and rests on the theory of planned behavior. The instructional approach of High School FLASH employs key concepts in every lesson, which enables teachers to hone in on the risk and protective factors outlined in the curriculum logic model. The curriculum covers the following topics: reproductive system, pregnancy, sexual orientation and gender identity, healthy relationships, coercion and consent, online safety, abstinence, birth control, preventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other STDs, condoms, STD testing, communicating and decision making, and improving school health. The curriculum aligns with national health education standards.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2019
CompletedSeptember 11, 2019
September 1, 2019
2.3 years
September 3, 2019
September 9, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Self-reported rates of vaginal sex
Measured with a single item required and provided by the funder: "In the past 3 months, have you had vaginal intercourse, even once?" Yes/No
3 months post-intervention
Self-reported rates of vaginal sex
Measured with a single item required and provided by the funder: "In the past 3 months, have you had vaginal intercourse, even once?" Yes/No
12 months post-intervention
Self-reported rates of vaginal sex without a condom or other birth control
Combined the following two questions required and provided by the funder: "In the past 3 months, have you had vaginal intercourse without you or your partner using a condom?" and "In the past 3 months, how many times have you had vaginal intercourse without you or your partner using any of these methods of birth control: birth control pills, the shot, the patch, the ring, intrauterine device (IUD), or Implant" New outcome was coded 'yes' if either question was endorsed and 'no' if both questions were responded to as 'no'
3 months post-intervention
Self-reported rates of vaginal sex without a condom or other birth control
Combined the following two questions required and provided by the funder: "In the past 3 months, have you had vaginal intercourse without you or your partner using a condom?" and "In the past 3 months, how many times have you had vaginal intercourse without you or your partner using any of these methods of birth control: birth control pills, the shot, the patch, the ring, intrauterine device (IUD), or Implant" New outcome was coded 'yes' if either question was endorsed and 'no' if both questions were responded to as 'no'
12 months post-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Self-reported initiation of vaginal sex
3 months post-intervention
Self-reported initiation of vaginal sex
12 months post-intervention
Self-reported knowledge of sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing
3 months post-intervention
Self-reported knowledge of sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing
12 months post-intervention
Self-reported comfort with family communication regarding sexual health
3 months post-intervention
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
FLASH curriculum
EXPERIMENTALStudents who will receive the FLASH high school curriculum.
Sexual Health Education for Adolescents
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudents will receive a five-session knowledge-based sexual health curriculum designed for classroom settings.
Interventions
High School FLASH is a 15-session comprehensive sexual health curriculum designed for classroom settings in grades 9 to 12. The basis of High School FLASH is a public health approach to behavior change. The primary strategy used in the FLASH curriculum for preventing teen pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and sexual violence is to address student behaviors and attitudes. To this end, FLASH uses a harm reduction and behavior change framework, implements best practices as outlined in the research on effective programs, addresses risk and protective factors for program goals, and rests on the theory of planned behavior. The instructional approach of High School FLASH employs key concepts in every lesson, which enables teachers to hone in on the risk and protective factors outlined in the curriculum logic model.
Sexual Health Education for Adolescents is a five-session knowledge-based sexual health curriculum designed for classroom settings. The lessons cover the reproductive system, pregnancy, birth control, abstinence, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and healthy relationships. The goal of the curriculum is to increase student knowledge in all content areas. The primary strategy employed by Sexual Health Education for Adolescents is to address the cognitive learning domain. The curriculum aligns to national health education standards and is intended to be implemented by classroom teachers. The lessons can be delivered according to the schedule that works best for schools (e.g., twice a week, once a week, every days) within a school semester.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- District level eligibility: Districts must have been from regions with teen birth rates at or above the national average at the time of study recruitment. They also much have agreed with randomization of mainstream schools to either High School FLASH or the five-session knowledge-based comparison condition. We worked with 7 different districts in two different regions of the U.S. - the Midwest (2 districts) and the South (5 districts).
- School level eligibility: Schools were eligible to participate if they: (1) agreed with inviting all students in targeted grade level in the fall semester required class to take part in the study (9th or 10th grades depending on health education course placement); (2) had a policy environment that enabled implementation of all FLASH components if randomized to intervention condition; (3) were in a district not currently mandating comprehensive sexuality education or using an evidence-based sexual health curriculum in school or for after-school programs; and (4) have schools large enough to ideally contribute 40 or more students to the study.
- Student level eligibility: Student enrollment into the study must have included (1) being in targeted classes during the enrollment window (fall semester 2016 in the Midwest and fall semester 2017 in the South), (2) providing positive parent consent to take part in study survey; and (3) providing assent to take part in the survey.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- ETR Associateslead
- Public Health Seattle King Countycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
ETR
Scotts Valley, California, 95066, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Karin Coyle, PhD
ETR
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2019
First Posted
September 6, 2019
Study Start
October 5, 2016
Primary Completion
January 30, 2019
Study Completion
June 30, 2019
Last Updated
September 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09