Study Stopped
Because of researcher foreign training
Neurofeedback In Treatment Resistant Depression
Neurofeedback Treatment on Depressive Symptoms and Functional Recovery in Treatment-resistant Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: an Open-label Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators evaluate the effects of neurofeedback as an augmentation treatment on depressive symptoms and functional recovery in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). TRD patients are assigned to the neurofeedback augmentation group and the medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group. The neurofeedback augmentation group underwent combined therapy comprising medication and 12-24 sessions of neurofeedback training for 12 weeks. To assess the serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in both groups, a pre- and post-treatment blood samples are obtained. Patients are evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), 5-level version of European Quality of Life Questionnaire 5-Dimensional Classification (EQ-5D-5L), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable depression
Started Jun 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 27, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 8, 2020
CompletedJuly 1, 2020
June 1, 2020
5.5 years
August 22, 2019
June 29, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] score at baselline and the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points
The HAM-D is an observer rating scale and 1 of the most widely used measures of depressive disorder. This scale composed of 17 items, and it has been used to assess the therapeutic effect as well as the severity of depression. Total score is 52, where higher scores indicating more severe depression. Hamilton considered Total score of 8-13 mild range, 14-18 moderate, 18-22 severe, and 23 or higher very severe.
at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Changes in Beck Depression Inventory- II (BDI-II) scores at baselline and the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points
at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points.
Changes in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) score at baselline and the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points
at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points.
Changes in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) at baselline and the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points
at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week time points.
Comparisons of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) level between baseline and the 12-week time point among groups
at baseline, and 12-week time points.
Type and number of adverse events
through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
neurofeedback augmentation group
EXPERIMENTALThe neurofeedback augmentation group was asked to participate in 12 weeks of combined therapy of medication and 12-24 sessions of neurofeedback training. The neurofeedback protocol was determined considering the patient's main symptoms. Patients in the neurofeedback augmentation group received sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) beta or beta training for 30 minutes, and then alpha/theta (A/T) training for 30 minutes in each session.
medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group
ACTIVE COMPARATORTo reduce the impact of confounding factors, the medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group visited at the same schedule as neurofeedback augmentation group and received psychotherapy placebo sessions instead of neurofeedback training sessions. These sessions included psychological assessment and supportive psychotherapy. The medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group maintained the same medication use as that before the study.
healthy controls
NO INTERVENTIONThe healthy controls provided blood samples using the same procedure at baseline only.
Interventions
Neurofeedback training was performed using a Neurocybernetics EEG Biofeedback system (Neurocybernetics Inc., Encino, CA, USA). The neurofeedback protocol was determined by the neurofeedback team, which included 3 psychiatrists, in consideration of the patient's main symptoms. The neurofeedback augmentation group was asked to participate in 12 weeks of combined therapy of medication and 12-24 sessions of neurofeedback training. Patients in the neurofeedback augmentation group received sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) beta or beta training for 30 minutes, and then alpha/theta (A/T) training for 30 minutes in each session. To reduce the impact of confounding factors, the medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group visited at the same schedule as neurofeedback augmentation group and received psychotherapy placebo sessions. The medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group maintained the same medication use as that before the study.
The neurofeedback augmentation group and the medication-only group maintained the same medication use as that before the study.
To reduce the impact of confounding factors, the medication-only (treatment as usual, TAU) group visited at the same schedule as neurofeedback augmentation group and received psychotherapy placebo sessions instead of neurofeedback training sessions. These sessions included psychological assessment and supportive psychotherapy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagosis with MDD according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD, and especially treatment-resistant MDD (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression \[HAM-D\] score ⩾14) despite adequate antidepressant therapy)
You may not qualify if:
- Psychosis
- Bipolar disorder
- Brain injury
- Clinically diagnosed neurological disorder
- Convulsive disorder
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Yeungnam University Hospital
Daegu, 42415, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Lee YJ, Lee GW, Seo WS, Koo BH, Kim HG, Cheon EJ. Neurofeedback Treatment on Depressive Symptoms and Functional Recovery in Treatment-Resistant Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: an Open-Label Pilot Study. J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Nov 4;34(42):e287. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e287.
PMID: 31674161DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eun-Jin Cheon, M.D., Ph.D
Yeungnam University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2019
First Posted
September 6, 2019
Study Start
June 27, 2014
Primary Completion
December 27, 2019
Study Completion
February 8, 2020
Last Updated
July 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06