NCT04078113

Brief Summary

This project has 2 phases. Phase 1: diagnostic test study, to evaluate the efficacy of the variation of pupillary size (PDR) to detect pain in ICU patients regarding to Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) and ESCID (Conductual Scale Pain Index). Phase 2: controlled and aleatorized clinical trial to evaluate efficacy in PDR monitoring after painful assessed minimum stimulus with the best diagnostic efficiency on phase 1, as a need of analgesia indicator tool. The sample will be patients over 18 years, sedated and mechanically ventilated, with an initial BPS of 3, RASS between -1 and -4, not able not to communicate , with inform consent signed. Exclusion criteria will be: ophtalmologic pathology and administration of drugs interfering pupillary reflexes. Measurements before/during pain/non-pain situations, aspiration of secretions and calibrated intensity stimulus through the pupilometer Algiscan. The investigators will study association between pain according to BPS/ESCID and pupillary dilatation according to pupillometry and percentage of patients with pain and preanalgesia according to pupillometry and standard clinical practice.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
82

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 14, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 4, 2019

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 11, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

July 2, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Pupillary dilationAnalgosedatedMechanically ventilation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Propotion of patient with pain on experimental group versus control group

    To compare the proprtion of patients with pain according to Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS), pupillometry and Scale of Behaviour Indicators of Pain (escid)

    An average of 1 year

  • Proportion of patient who require anesthesia on experimental group versus control group

    The proportion of patients who require anesthesia on experimental group (previous analgesia according to pupillometry during endotracheal aspiration) versus control group (previous analgesia according to standard clinical practice).

    An average of 1 year

Study Arms (2)

Experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

Every patient will be subjected to a measured stimulus with a power selected in phase 1 (X mA) and pupillary dilatation will be measured by pupillometry. In those patients showing pupillary size variation over the limit for insufficient analgesia estimated in phase 1 for tracheal suction, additional analgesia will be provided before tracheal suction. In those patients without pain detected by pupillometry, additional anlagesia won´t be provided. In both cases Pupillometry, BPS and ESCID will be measured during tracheal suction to determine whether the patient is in pain or not.

Other: Pupillometer

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Before tracheal suction and due to medical decision, analgesia following current clinical practice would be administered prophylactically. Pupillometry, BPS and ESCID will be measured during tracheal suction to determinate whether the patient is in pain or not.

Interventions

Measurements of pupillary dilatation with pupillometer to administer or not analgesia

Experimental group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients over 18 years.
  • Analgosedated patients under mechanical ventilation.
  • Unable to communicate (verbal or motor).
  • Patients with initial BPS of 3, and RASS from -1 to -4.
  • Familiar prior informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients treated with muscle relaxants.
  • Severe Critical Polyneuropathy.
  • Pupillary reflex affectation in diabetic patients (diabetic papillopathy,glaucomatous optic neuropathy) or any other pathologies like Adie´s Syndrome, Argyl-Robertson pupil.
  • Patients with tansmisible ocular infections.
  • Patients with possible injury of the third carnial nerve (Horner´s syndrome) due to injury to the brainstem, cervical cord, cancer of the upper lobe the lung, dissection of the carotid and/or cluster headache.
  • Acute cerbrovascular conditions with Glasgow Coma Scale less than 6, or increased intracranial pressure, or pontine base infarction.
  • Drugs that interfere with the pupillary reflex (clonidine, dexmedetomidine, metoclopramide, tramadol, droperidol, ketamine, nitrous oxide).
  • Patients under metoclopramide, if given 10 minutes prior the measurement of the pupillary reflex (PDR).
  • Patients during the first 24 hours after Cardiac Arrest (CRP).
  • Severe unestable comorbidity with doses of norepinephrine\> 0.6 microg/kg/min and/or dobutamine\>10 microg/kg/min or drenalin any doses.
  • Patients with untreated pheochromocytomas.
  • Refuse to participate in the trial.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Araba University hospital

Vitoria-Gasteiz, Álava, 01009, Spain

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Lopez de Audicana Jimenez de Aberasturi Y, Vallejo De la Cueva A, Parraza Diez N. The effectiveness of a pupillary dilation reflex as an analgesia indicator: A protocol for a randomised multicentre trial in critically ill patients. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Oct 1;9:100431. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100431. eCollection 2025 Dec.

  • Lopez-De-Audicana-Jimenez-De-Aberasturi Y, Vallejo-De-La-Cueva A, Parraza-Diez N. Behavioral pain scales, vital signs, and pupilometry to pain assessment in the critically ill patient: A cross sectional study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;247:108644. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108644. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

  • Lopez de Audicana-Jimenez de Aberasturi Y, Vallejo-De la Cueva A, Aretxabala-Cortajarena N, Rodriguez-Nunez C, Pelegrin-Gaspar PM, Gil-Garcia ZI, Rodriguez-Borrajo MJ, Marguello-Fernandez AA, Parraza-Diez N. The pupillary dilation reflex to a nociceptive stimulus as a tool for analgesia management: A diagnostic study. Aust Crit Care. 2024 Mar;37(2):230-235. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainMydriasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPupil DisordersEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ana Vallejo de la Cueva, Dr.

    Basque Health System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2019

First Posted

September 4, 2019

Study Start

March 14, 2019

Primary Completion

July 30, 2022

Study Completion

October 31, 2022

Last Updated

March 11, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations