NCT04077060

Brief Summary

There is an ongoing debate regarding how cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening can best be incorporated into current prenatal screening algorithms for chromosomal abnormalities. Test performance of cfDNA has been shown to be better that first-trimester combined screening (FTCS). However, the cost of the cfDNA testing is considered too high to adopt as first line screening. Moreover, FTCS includes a detailed ultrasound examination of the fetus with nuchal translucency (NT) measurement that allows for early detection of fetal abnormalities. An approach in which every woman are offered an early anatomy scan along with cfDNA may also be a reasonable option. Recently a randomized controlled trial, including 1,518 women with singleton pregnancy undergoing first-trimester screening, compared the screening performance of FTCS with an approach that uses the combination of a detailed ultrasound examination and cfDNA analysis. The trial showed that first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21 that includes a detailed ultrasound examination along cfDNA was associated with a significant reduction in the false-positive rate compared with FTCS. This approach obviates the need for maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in screening for fetal aneuploidy. Despite robust evidence on the very high detection rate of cfDNA in detecting trisomy 21, literature is lacking on data regarding women's experience and emotional well-being and satisfaction after test-results of women offered cfDNA compared to those offered FTCS.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 26, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 26, 2019

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 4, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 15, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

February 24, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

August 26, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 20, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • reassurance

    women will be asked about three questions, with up to 35 point for each question. 1) are you reassured about the test? 2) are you sure the test is correct? 3) test give me certain reassurance about the syndrome of my child

    at the time of screening test

  • Anxiety

    anxiety test assessed by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

    at the time of screening test

  • Satisfaction of the pregnant women

    women will be asked if retrospectively they are happy with the assigned screening test as post-test satisfaction questionnaire: * Not all applicable (5 points) * Hardly applicable (10 points) * Somewhat applicable (20 points) * Very much applicable (35 points)

    11-13 weeks of gestation

  • False positive rate

    False positive rate for any trosomy and for trisomy 21

    1 week after test

  • Anxiety

    anxiety test assessed by The Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire (PRAQ-R)

    at the time of screening test

Study Arms (2)

NIPT

EXPERIMENTAL

Women randomized in the intervention group will be offered cfDNA screening, along with an early detailed anatomy scan, including nuchal measurement, at 11-13 weeks of gestation. cfDNA analysis will include a simultaneous microarray-based assay of non-polymorphic (chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y) and polymorphic loci to estimate chromosome proportion and fetal fraction. NIPT will be performed at the time of randomization or after if gestational age at randomization \< 9 6/7 weeks of gestation.

Diagnostic Test: NIPT

Combined screening

OTHER

Control group includes the standard of care. In our department, first-trimester risk assessment is performed routinely at 11-13 weeks of gestation by FTCS as per standard of care. FTCS includes crown-rump length, NT measurements, and a detailed ultrasound examination based on ISUOG guidelines. All operators who perform this examination are certified by the UK Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF). A specific risk for aneuploidy is not calculated if NT measurement is \>3.5 mm or if fetal anomaly is identified. These cases are deemed to be at a very high risk for chromosomal abnormalities and are offered invasive testing.

Diagnostic Test: combined screening

Interventions

NIPTDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Women randomized in the intervention group will be offered cfDNA screening, along with an early detailed anatomy scan, including nuchal measurement, at 11-13 weeks of gestation. cfDNA analysis will include a simultaneous microarray-based assay of non-polymorphic (chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y) and polymorphic loci to estimate chromosome proportion and fetal fraction. NIPT will be performed at the time of randomization or after if gestational age at randomization \< 9 6/7 weeks of gestation. Women in both groups will be given oral counseling by obstetricians and will be counseled about test procedures, reporting time, test sensitivity and specificity, and the necessity to confirm abnormal screening results with invasive testing.

NIPT
combined screeningDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Control group includes the standard of care. In our department, first-trimester risk assessment is performed routinely at 11-13 weeks of gestation by FTCS as per standard of care. FTCS includes crown-rump length, NT measurements, and a detailed ultrasound examination based on ISUOG guidelines. All operators who perform this examination are certified by the UK Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF). A specific risk for aneuploidy is not calculated if NT measurement is \>3.5 mm or if fetal anomaly is identified. These cases are deemed to be at a very high risk for chromosomal abnormalities and are offered invasive testing.

Combined screening

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility Detailsonly pregnant women
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Pregnant women with singleton gestations
  • ≤12 6/7 weeks of gestation
  • Normal ultrasound examination at the time of randomization
  • \>18 \<45 years
  • Crown-rump length (CRL) \<84 mm at the time of randomization

You may not qualify if:

  • Multiple gestations, including vanishing twins
  • \>12 6/7 weeks of gestation
  • Ectopic pregnancy
  • Abnormal ultrasound examination at the time of first prenatal visit
  • Women who are unconscious, severly ill, mentally handicapped, or under the age of 18 years.
  • Women who have already planned for invasive prenatal testing, e.g. for a history of prior child or pregnancy with chromosomal or genetic abnormalities
  • CRL \>84mm at the time of randomization

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gabriele Saccone

Napoli, 80129, Italy

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Migliorini S, Saccone G, Silvestro F, Massaro G, Arduino B, D'Alessandro P, Petti MT, Paino JAC, Guida M, Locci M, Zullo F. First-trimester screening based on cell-free DNA vs combined screening: A randomized clinical trial on women's experience. Prenat Diagn. 2020 Oct;40(11):1482-1488. doi: 10.1002/pd.5800. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aneuploidy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chromosome AberrationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2019

First Posted

September 4, 2019

Study Start

August 26, 2019

Primary Completion

January 15, 2020

Study Completion

February 15, 2020

Last Updated

February 24, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations