Arbitration Between Habitual and Goal-directed Behavior in Obsessive-compulsive Disorder: Circuit Dynamics and Effects of Noninvasive Neurostimulation
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
People utilize two behavioral strategies, goal-directed and habitual, when engaging in value-based decision-making that involves rewarding or punishing outcomes. Accumulating evidence suggests an imbalance between habitual and goal-directed behavior in favor of habitual control in parallel with exaggerated tendency toward compulsive/harm avoidance behavior in OCD. In healthy subjects, an arbitration mechanism has been proposed recently that controls the balance between those two strategies of action selection. Arbitration regions regulate the goal-directed/habitual decision-making balance by selectively downregulating the activity of the habitual regions. This project aims to explore the neurobehavioral characteristics of arbitration mechanism and its relationship with behaviors and clinical phenotypes in OCD by applying computational cognitive neuroscience, clinical task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 12, 2025
CompletedDecember 12, 2025
November 1, 2025
4.6 years
August 29, 2019
July 5, 2025
November 26, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Strength of Behaving Model-based (Goal-directed)
Strength of behaving model-based (goal-directed) is measured and quantifiedas a continuous real number between 0 and 1. Here, having a strength's valueof 1 of behaving model-based means that subject in her/his decision-making,exclusively and always utilizes a model-based (goal-directed) strategy fordecision making and having a value of Zero means not utilizing model-based(goal-directed) strategy at all when decising.
On the second or third session when subjects performed the task in the MRI scanner.
Reaction Time in Response to Stimuli With OCD Themes
This is a time interval (in seconds) between the start of presentation of visual stimuli with OCD themes and when subjects pushed a bottom to stop the presentation when they could not tolerate those more during symptom provocation and avoidance task.
On the second or third session when subjects performed the task in the MRI scanner.
Strength of Frontal Arbitration Modulation of Basal Ganglia Habit Region.
Here, by applying Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) method, we measured thestrength of frontal arbitration (the interior frontal gyrus (IFG)) modulation ofbasal ganglia habit region (the posterolateral putamen) in terms of the effective(directed) connectivity between the interior frontal gyrus (IFG) andposterolateral putamen. This DCM-based effective connectivity can have avalue between -1 and +1. A value of -1 means a maximum effective connectivitybetween the interior frontal gyrus (IFG) and posterolateral putamen. A value of+1 means maximum excitatory effective connectivity between the interior frontalgyrus (IFG) and posterolateral putamen. And a value of 0 means no effectiveconnectivity between the interior frontal gyrus (IFG) and posterolateralputamen.
On the second or third session when subjects performed the task in the MRI scanner
Study Arms (2)
Healthy subjects
ACTIVE COMPARATOROCD subjects
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
tDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation method by which constant low direct current can be delivered to the sculpt for changing the excitability of neuronal structure adjunct to the stimulating electrode.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for OCD as primary (most severe) diagnosis (based on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview).
- Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) total score is equal or greater than 16.
- unmediated or being on a stable dose of medication (only SSRIs and clomipramine) for at least 12 weeks prior to the study.
- fluent English speaker.
- signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- IQ greater than 80 on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scales of Intelligence.
- lifetime DSM-5 diagnosis of mania, psychotic disorder, or substance dependence (per MINI).
- current DSM-5 diagnosis of MDD if Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) scores are equal or greater than 35 (severe), or ADHD.
- taking any psychotropic medication other than SSRIs or clomipramine.
- severe psychiatric symptom that requires immediate inpatient psychiatric intervention such as suicidality.
- presence of any serious psychiatric, psychosocial, or neurological condition requiring immediate treatment.
- males and females age 18-65 years with signed informed consent and IQ greater than 80 on WASI.
- presence of any MR scan contraindications particularly body metal or positive pregnancy test.
- medical conditions in which cerebral metabolism might be compromised such as thyroid disorders, diabetes or current tobacco smoking (potential effect on imaging endpoints).
- any history of seizure disorders.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Reza Tadayon Nejad
- Organization
- UCLA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2019
First Posted
September 3, 2019
Study Start
July 15, 2019
Primary Completion
January 31, 2024
Study Completion
January 31, 2024
Last Updated
December 12, 2025
Results First Posted
December 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share