Isthmocele After Two Different Sutures in Cesarean Section
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cesarean delivery (CD) rates are rising globally. about 30% of women delivered by CD in 2015 only in the USA. This increasing CD rate has stimulated an interest in the potential short- and long-term morbidity of CD scars. In more than 50% of women with history of CD, a uterine scar defect, also called a "isthmocele," defined as a disruption of the myometrium in the CD uterine scar, can be observed when examined by gel instillation sonohysterography 6-12 months after the CD. Uterine scar defects detected on ultrasound have been associated with prolonged menstrual bleeding and postmenstrual spotting, as well as with an increased risk of several obstetrical complications in subsequent pregnancies, including uterine dehiscence and/or rupture, scar pregnancy and placenta previa and accreta. Another screening method associated with uterine scar rupture in women with prior CD is ultrasonographic measurement of the thickness of the lower uterine segment, as pioneered by Rozenberg et al. in 1996. A meta-analysis by Kok et al. supports the use of the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) for predicting uterine rupture during vaginal birth after cesarean. Uterine scar defects have been associated with lower RMT. A growing body of evidence suggests that the surgical technique for uterine closure influences uterine scar healing and the RMT, but there is still no consensus about optimal uterine closure and type of suture. It is imperative to have evidence-based guidelines for each surgical step before recommending one technique over another. The aim of our trial is to evaluate the incidence of cesarean scar defect according to type of suture at the time of cesarean
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 25, 2021
CompletedAugust 24, 2021
August 1, 2021
1.9 years
August 26, 2019
August 21, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
incidence of cesarean scar defects at ultrasound 6-months follow-up
6-months follow-up after cesarean
Secondary Outcomes (3)
incidence of scar defects at hysteroscopy at 6 months follow-up
6-months follow-up after cesarean
Symptoms of cesarean scar defect
6-months follow-up after cesarean
RMT
6-months follow-up after cesarean
Study Arms (2)
monofilament
EXPERIMENTALmonofilament absorbable suture
polifilament
ACTIVE COMPARATORsynthetic absorbable braided (polifilament) suture
Interventions
In the intervention group,monofilament absorbable suture,will be used.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant women with singleton gestations
- Between ≥37 and ≤42 gestational age
- \>18 \<45 years
- Undergoing primary or secondary elective or urgent cesarean delivery
You may not qualify if:
- Multiple gestations
- Preterm cesarean
- or more prior cesarean deliveries
- Uterine malformations
- Prior myomectomy
- Placenta accreta/previa
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gabriele Saccone
Napoli, 80129, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Saccone G, De Angelis MC, Zizolfi B, Gragnano E, Musone M, Zullo F, Bifulco G, Di Spiezio Sardo A. Monofilament vs multifilament suture for uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 May;4(3):100592. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100592. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
PMID: 35131497DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2019
First Posted
August 29, 2019
Study Start
September 1, 2019
Primary Completion
July 20, 2021
Study Completion
July 25, 2021
Last Updated
August 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share