Efficacy of Paracervical Block in Laparoscopic Myomectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial (PALM)
PALM
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
2
Brief Summary
It remains controversial whether paracervical block should be performed as a powerful strategy for pain relief in laparoscopic myomectomy (LM), because convincing conclusions are difficult to draw because of the heterogeneous and contradictory nature of the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of paracervical blocks using with 0.5% bupivacaine prior to LM for benign gynecologic conditions on postoperative pain relief.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2020
CompletedAugust 28, 2019
August 1, 2019
11 months
August 23, 2019
August 23, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pain
The scale was presented as a 10-cm line with verbal descriptors ranging from "no pain" to "worst imaginable pain".
at 6-hour after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Frequency of pills/injections requested
Within 24-hour after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Paracervical block with 5% bupivacaine
EXPERIMENTALThe paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.
Paracervical block with normal saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORck with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.
Interventions
The paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine or normal saline was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.
The paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.
The paracervical injection with 10 mL of normal saline was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Uterine myoma
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASAPS) classification I-II
- The absence of pregnancy at the time of surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- history of cervical surgery such as conization or cerclage
- inability to perform the paracervical block due to anatomical abnormalities (i.e., very atrophic or small cervix)
- allergy to bupivacaine, planned concomitant surgical procedures involving extensive additional tissue manipulation such as pelvic lymph node dissection
- any concomitant surgery of pelvic floor repair (uterosacral ligament suspension or sacrocolpopexy) or vaginal procedure (anterior or posterior colporrhaphy or mid-urethral slings)
- previously taking opioids for chronic pain
- inability to accurately express their pain
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Seoul, 03181, South Korea
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Wŏnju, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Taejong Song
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2019
First Posted
August 28, 2019
Study Start
August 23, 2019
Primary Completion
August 1, 2020
Study Completion
August 1, 2020
Last Updated
August 28, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share