S-BLR Versus C-BLR for CI-IXT in Children
SCCIXT
Slanted Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Versus Conventional Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession for Convergence Insufficiency Intermittent Exotropia in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a multi-center, randomized single-blind controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of S-BLR with C-BLR for the treatment of CI-IXT in children. Specific Aim 1 (Primary): To compare the surgical successful rate of S-BLR with C-BLR for the treatment of CI-IXT in children. Specific Aim 2 (Secondary): To study the suboptimal surgical outcomes between S-BLR and C-BLR for the treatment of CI-IXT in children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 18, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 19, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 11, 2023
CompletedDecember 20, 2023
December 1, 2023
2.3 years
August 4, 2019
December 14, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
surgical successful rate
Surgical successful cases/total cases. The successful criterion is a postoperative residual deviation at near and distance between 10 PD of exophoria/tropia and 5 PD of esophoria/tropia with near-distance difference \<10 PD.
at 12 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
suboptimal surgical rate
at 12 month
Study Arms (2)
S-BLR
EXPERIMENTALFor S-BLR, the lower horn of the LR is recessed based on near exodeviation and the upper horn is recessed based on distant exodeviation.
C-BLR
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor C-BLR, the LR is recessed based on distant exodeviation.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Exodeviation at least 15 at distance (6 meters);
- Exodeviation at most 50 at near (1/3 meter);
- Greater exodeviation at near than at distance by 10 or more;
- Control score of exodeviation greater than 3;
- Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better in the worse eye, and interocular difference of less than 2 lines;
- Myopia5.00D, hyperopia3.0D and anisometropia≤2.5D based on cycloplegic refraction
- Optical correction needed for at least 2 weeks before evaluation of exodeviation: myopia0.5D or astigmatism1.5D in either eye, or anisometropia1.0D;
- Written informed consent given by participants and their parents or legal guardians.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior strabismus surgery or botulinum toxin injection;
- Coexisting vertical deviation greater than 5, oblique muscle dysfunction, torsional deviation, dissociated vertical deviation, A-V pattern, or other conditions requiring horizontal rectus transposition, oblique surgery or vertical rectus surgery;
- Paralytic or restrictive strabismus;
- Lateral incomitance (greater exodeviation in right or left gaze position than in primary position by 5 or more with appropriate optical correction);
- Ocular disease other than strabismus or refractive error;
- Previous intraocular or refractive surgery;
- Craniofacial malformations affecting the orbit;
- Significant neurological disorders;
- Birth date34 weeks or birth weight1500 gram.
- Abbreviations: CI-IXT, convergence insufficiency intermittent exotropia; D, diopter.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chen Zhaolead
- Children's Hospital of Fudan Universitycollaborator
- Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicinecollaborator
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicinecollaborator
- Tianjin Eye Hospitalcollaborator
- Renmin Hospital of Wuhan Universitycollaborator
- AIER Eye Hospital (Kunming)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
Shanghai, China
Related Publications (12)
Burian HM. Exodeviations: their classification, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966 Dec;62(6):1161-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(66)92570-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 5957892BACKGROUNDRaab EL, Parks MM. Recession of the lateral recti. Effect of Preoperative fusion and distance-near relationship. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975 Aug;93(8):584-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1975.01010020568002.
PMID: 1156220BACKGROUNDSnir M, Axer-Siegel R, Shalev B, Sherf I, Yassur Y. Slanted lateral rectus recession for exotropia with convergence weakness. Ophthalmology. 1999 May;106(5):992-6. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00522-9.
PMID: 10328402BACKGROUNDChun BY, Kang KM. Early results of slanted recession of the lateral rectus muscle for intermittent exotropia with convergence insufficiency. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:380467. doi: 10.1155/2015/380467. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
PMID: 25688298BACKGROUNDFarid MF, Abdelbaset EA. Surgical outcomes of three different surgical techniques for treatment of convergence insufficiency intermittent exotropia. Eye (Lond). 2018 Apr;32(4):693-700. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.259. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
PMID: 29271419BACKGROUNDChen X, Fu Z, Yu J, Ding H, Bai J, Chen J, Gong Y, Zhu H, Yu R, Liu H. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in Eastern China: results from screening of preschool children aged 36-72 months. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;100(4):515-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306999. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
PMID: 26261229BACKGROUNDYang HK, Hwang JM. Surgical outcomes in convergence insufficiency-type exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2011 Aug;118(8):1512-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
PMID: 21474185BACKGROUNDWang B, Wang L, Wang Q, Ren M. Comparison of different surgery procedures for convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia in children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct;98(10):1409-13. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304442. Epub 2014 May 19.
PMID: 24842862BACKGROUNDMa L, Yang L, Li N. Bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession for the convergence insufficiency type of intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS. 2016 Jun;20(3):194-196.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 May 6.
PMID: 27164428BACKGROUNDChoi DG, Rosenbaum AL. Medial rectus resection(s) with adjustable suture for intermittent exotropia of the convergence insufficiency type. J AAPOS. 2001 Feb;5(1):13-7. doi: 10.1067/mpa.2001.111137.
PMID: 11182666BACKGROUNDBURIAN HM, SPIVEY BE. THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF EXODEVIATIONS. Am J Ophthalmol. 1965 Apr;59:603-20. No abstract available.
PMID: 14270998BACKGROUNDKraft SP, Levin AV, Enzenauer RW. Unilateral surgery for exotropia with convergence weakness. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1995 May-Jun;32(3):183-7. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19950501-12.
PMID: 7636700BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Chen Zhao, Doctor
Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiaoli Kang, Doctor
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yueping Li, Doctor
Tianjin Eye Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lianhong Zhou, Doctor
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jing Yao, Doctor
Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chenhao Yang, Doctor
Children's Hospital of Fudan University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jiangtao Xu, Doctor
AIER Eye Hospital (Kunming)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Vice President of Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2019
First Posted
August 21, 2019
Study Start
October 18, 2019
Primary Completion
February 19, 2022
Study Completion
February 11, 2023
Last Updated
December 20, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We concerns about patient privacy issues and it's better to protect the publication potential.