Anorectal Application of 5% Lidocaine Cream Reduces Pain Prior to Periprostatic Nerve Block During Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
1 other identifier
interventional
284
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is performed with a periprostatic nerve block to the neurovascular bundle bilaterally. This does not reduce the pain due to probe insertion and manipulation prior to nerve blockage. Our study goal is to assess whether topical analgesia would reduce pain during the early stages of the procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain
Started Dec 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2019
CompletedJanuary 13, 2020
January 1, 2020
7 months
January 20, 2019
January 8, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Pain level before probe insertion
Self reported by the patient using a 0-10 visual analogue scale. 0 being no pain at all, 10 being worst pain imaginable.
Before transrectal ultrasound probe insertion
Pain level at TRUS probe insertion
Self reported by the patient using a 0-10 visual analogue scale. 0 being no pain at all, 10 being worst pain imaginable.
During transrectal ultrasound probe insertion into the rectum (defined as beginning of procedure)
Pain level during TRUS probe manipulation in the rectum
Self reported by the patient using a 0-10 visual analogue scale. 0 being no pain at all, 10 being worst pain imaginable.
During transrectal ultrasound probe manipulation in the rectum (estimated at 0-2 minutes length)
Pain level during periprostatic nerve block
Self reported by the patient using a 0-10 visual analogue scale. 0 being no pain at all, 10 being worst pain imaginable.
During periprostatic nerve block (rectal wall puncture with needle, estimated at 2-3 minutes after beginning of procedure)
Pain level during biopsy collection
Self reported by the patient using a 0-10 visual analogue scale. 0 being no pain at all, 10 being worst pain imaginable.
During biopsy collection using an 18-gauge needle (estimated at 3-10 minutes from beginning of procedure)
Pain level at termination of procedure
Self reported by the patient using a 0-10 visual analogue scale. 0 being no pain at all, 10 being worst pain imaginable.
At termination of procedure (total estimated length of procedure is 10 minutes).
Study Arms (7)
External Anal application - 5 minutes exposure
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnal application of lidocaine cream 5% for 5 minutes before probe insertion. After probe insertion and prior to biopsy, a periprostatic nerve block was performed with 10 mL of 1% Lidocaine (5 mL on each side).
External Anal application - 10 minutes exposure
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnal application of lidocaine cream 5% for 10 minutes before probe insertion. After probe insertion and prior to biopsy, a periprostatic nerve block was performed with 10 mL of 1% Lidocaine (5 mL on each side).
External Anal application - 20 minutes exposure
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnal application of lidocaine cream 5% for 20 minutes before probe insertion. After probe insertion and prior to biopsy, a periprostatic nerve block was performed with 10 mL of 1% Lidocaine (5 mL on each side).
External Anal plus intrarectal - 5 minutes exposure
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnal application plus intrarectal application of 5% lidocaine cream for 5 minutes before probe insertion. After probe insertion and prior to biopsy, a periprostatic nerve block was performed with 10 mL of 1% Lidocaine (5 mL on each side).
External Anal plus intrarectal - 10 minutes exposure
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnal application plus intrarectal application of 5% lidocaine cream for 10 minutes before probe insertion. After probe insertion and prior to biopsy, a periprostatic nerve block was performed with 10 mL of 1% Lidocaine (5 mL on each side).
External Anal plus intrarectal - 20 minutes exposure
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnal application plus intrarectal application of 5% lidocaine cream for 20 minutes before probe insertion. After probe insertion and prior to biopsy, a periprostatic nerve block was performed with 10 mL of 1% Lidocaine (5 mL on each side).
Control group
SHAM COMPARATORNo anal application of lidocaine cream prior to probe insertion. After probe insertion and prior to biopsy, a periprostatic nerve block was performed with 10 mL of 1% Lidocaine (5 mL on each side).
Interventions
The investigators checked visual analogue scale of pain at different time periods: prior to probe insertion, during probe insertion. during probe manipulation in the rectum, during performance of periprostatic nerve block, during actual biopsy collection and at termination of procedure.
Performing a prostate biopsy using a transrectal ultrasound probe - the BK pro focus 2202 transrectal ultrasound and the 8808 bi-plane transrectal probe
Prostate biopsy guided by a transrectal ultrasound with an 18 gauge needle
Performing a bilateral peri-prostatic nerve block with 10 mL of 1% lidocaine (5 mL on each side)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males referred to TRUSGBx due to elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA)
- Abnormal findings on digital rectal examination (DRE)
- Repeat biopsies as part of Active Surveillance (AS)
- Continuously elevated PSA levels despite prior negative for malignancy biopsies
- Previous histological findings of significant HGPIN were enrolled
You may not qualify if:
- Known sensitivity to Lidocaine
- Pre-planned biopsy under general anesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
Lee C, Woo HH. Current methods of analgesia for transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy -- a systematic review. BJU Int. 2014 Mar;113 Suppl 2:48-56. doi: 10.1111/bju.12433.
PMID: 24053451RESULTTiong HY, Liew LC, Samuel M, Consigliere D, Esuvaranathan K. A meta-analysis of local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;10(2):127-36. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500935. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
PMID: 17211441RESULTWang J, Wang L, Du Y, He D, Chen X, Li L, Nan X, Fan J. Addition of intrarectal local analgesia to periprostatic nerve block improves pain control for transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Urol. 2015 Jan;22(1):62-8. doi: 10.1111/iju.12595. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
PMID: 25141759RESULTRaber M, Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Deho F, Briganti A, Salonia A, Gallina A, Di Girolamo V, Montorsi F, Rigatti P. Topical prilocaine-lidocaine cream combined with peripheral nerve block improves pain control in prostatic biopsy: results from a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol. 2008 May;53(5):967-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
PMID: 17904278RESULTGiannarini G, Autorino R, Valent F, Mogorovich A, Manassero F, De Maria M, Morelli G, Barbone F, Di Lorenzo G, Selli C. Combination of perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):585-91; discussion 591-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
PMID: 19084860RESULTBarcohana N, Duperon DF, Yashar M. The relationship of application time to EMLA efficacy. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 Jan-Apr;70(1):51-4.
PMID: 12762609RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Judith Ben Zvi
Assaf Harofeh Medical Center ethical committee for experiments in humans
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2019
First Posted
August 21, 2019
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share