Efficacy of Piroxicam as a Perioperative Analgesic for Patients Undergoing Fixation of Maxillofacial Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
At Eldemerdash Hospital at Ain Shams University in Egypt, 72 adult patients (16 to 25 years old) who had mandibular or maxillary fractures were treated with open reduction and internal stabilization. Patients were divided into two categories. (31 patients each) Using randomly generated data from computer, the piroxicam group received 0.4 mg/kg of intramuscular piroxicam, while the general anesthesia group (GA group) did not receive piroxicam. The overall amount of rescue analgesic dosage and postoperative complications like nausea and vomiting were therefore included in the outcomes measurement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1 postoperative-pain
Started Aug 2019
Longer than P75 for early_phase_1 postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedMarch 21, 2023
March 1, 2023
2.7 years
August 17, 2019
March 17, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
rescue dose of analgesic
patients needed additional doses of rescue analgesic
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
piroxicam
ACTIVE COMPARATORpiroxicam group who received induction with piroxicam(0.4mg/kg) IM
placebo
SHAM COMPARATORsaline IM in the same dose of piroxicam
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients aged from 16-25 years old
- ASAI II
- scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular or maxillary fractures
You may not qualify if:
- a history of convulsion,
- gastrodudenal ulcer
- hematological disorders
- patient suffering from hepatic or renal dysfunction
- concomitant use of anticoagulants
- refusal of the patients to participate
- patients younger than 12 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams U
Cairo, 11566, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nahed Effat, professor
Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor of Anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2019
First Posted
August 20, 2019
Study Start
August 16, 2019
Primary Completion
April 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
March 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- 7 months
- Access Criteria
- Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 23 (IBM© Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Normally distributed numerical data were presented as mean and SD, and skewed data were presented as median and interquartile range. Qualitative data were presented as number and percentage or ratio. Normally distributed numerical data were compared using the unpaired t-test. Skewed numerical data were compared using the Mann-Whitney test and categorical data were compared using Fisher's exact test.
study protocol statistical analysis data analysis