NCT04062045

Brief Summary

Investigators will analyze the efficacy of continuous regional anesthesia through a catheter under erector spinae muscle in a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Investigators will include 50 adults, predicted for elective lung surgery with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) technique. Patients will be randomly assigned to group A or B. Investigators will insert a catheter under the erector spinae muscle (ESC) at the T4 level of the operated side under ultrasound guidance. All patients will receive an initial bolus of 20ml levobupivacaine 0,5% through the catheter. Group A will receive a continuous infusion 5ml/h of ropivacaine 0,2% and intermittent boluses of the same local anesthetic 15ml/4h through the ESC. Group B will receive a continuous infusion of 0,9% saline in the same doses. All patients will have a PCA pump with piritramide 1mg/ml to cover the pain. All patients will receive regular doses of paracetamol and metamizole as part of multimodal analgesia. Investigators will compare pain, assessed with the VAS scale in resting and coughing and piritramide usage in both groups. Investigators will compare the incentive spirometry results at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively and observe for possible late complications.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 18, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 20, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 14, 2019

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 13, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

August 18, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 11, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Anesthesia, Conduction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Usage of opioid analgetics

    Investigators will measure the total consumption of i.v. piritramide after surgery.

    Continually 48 hours post surgery

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Subjective pain score

    Every hour in the 48 hours post surgery

  • Incentive spirometry

    24 and 48 hours after surgery

  • Satisfaction with analgesia

    1 day (at dismissal from hospital.)

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Complications

    2 months

Study Arms (2)

Group A - Local anesthetic group

EXPERIMENTAL

Group A will receive a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0,2% 5ml/h and intermittent boluses of the same local anesthetic 15ml/4h through the erector spinae catheter.

Drug: Ropivacaine Hcl 0.2% Inj Vil 10Ml

Group B - Placebo group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Group B will receive a continuous infusion of 0,9% saline 5ml/h and intermittent boluses of the same fluid 15ml/4h through the erector spinae catheter.

Drug: Saline 0.9%

Interventions

Group A will receive the medicine through the erector spinae catheter.

Group A - Local anesthetic group

Group B will receive Saline 0,9% through the erector spinae catheter.

Group B - Placebo group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed written informed consent
  • ASA I-III
  • Elective video-assisted thoracic surgery with 3 ports technique
  • No contraindications for regional anesthesia

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy to local anesthetic
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding
  • BMI\>35
  • Inflammation in the area of ES catheter insertion
  • Inability to use the PCA pump

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Surgery Bitenc

Golnik, 4204, Slovenia

RECRUITING

Related Publications (17)

  • Ahmed Z, Samad K, Ullah H. Role of intercostal nerve block in reducing postoperative pain following video-assisted thoracoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):54-57. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.197342.

    PMID: 28217054BACKGROUND
  • Bialka S, Copik M, Daszkiewicz A, Rivas E, Ruetzler K, Szarpak L, Misiolek H. Comparison of different methods of postoperative analgesia after thoracotomy-a randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Aug;10(8):4874-4882. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.88.

    PMID: 30233861BACKGROUND
  • Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.

    PMID: 27501016BACKGROUND
  • de Haan JB, Hernandez N, Sen S. Erector spinae block for postoperative analgesia following axillary hidradenitis suppurativa resection: a case report. Local Reg Anesth. 2018 Nov 15;11:87-90. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S179830. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30532584BACKGROUND
  • Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH, Kilic CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Nov;50:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

    PMID: 29980005BACKGROUND
  • Singh S, Choudhary NK, Lalin D, Verma VK. Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;32(4):330-334. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000603.

    PMID: 31033625BACKGROUND
  • Yayik AM, Cesur S, Ozturk F, Ahiskalioglu A, Ay AN, Celik EC, Karaavci NC. Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of the Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e779-e785. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.149. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

    PMID: 30853517BACKGROUND
  • Tulgar S, Senturk O. Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block at L-4 transverse process level provides effective postoperative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Feb;44:68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 14. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29149734BACKGROUND
  • Scimia P, Basso Ricci E, Droghetti A, Fusco P. The Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jul/Aug;42(4):537. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000616. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28632673BACKGROUND
  • Yenidunya O, Bircan HY, Altun D, Caymaz I, Demirag A, Turkoz A. Anesthesia management with ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block for donor nephrectomy: A prospective randomized study. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.038. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

    PMID: 28235492BACKGROUND
  • Helms O, Mariano J, Hentz JG, Santelmo N, Falcoz PE, Massard G, Steib A. Intra-operative paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in thoracotomy patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Oct;40(4):902-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.067. Epub 2011 Mar 5.

    PMID: 21377888BACKGROUND
  • Hong B, Bang S, Chung W, Yoo S, Chung J, Kim S. Multimodal analgesia with multiple intermittent doses of erector spinae plane block through a catheter after total mastectomy: a retrospective observational study. Korean J Pain. 2019 Jul 1;32(3):206-214. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.3.206.

    PMID: 31257829BACKGROUND
  • Kwon WJ, Bang SU, Sun WY. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Effective Analgesia after Total Mastectomy with Sentinel or Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: a Report of Three Cases. J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Nov 5;33(45):e291. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e291. No abstract available.

    PMID: 31044575BACKGROUND
  • Kot P, Rodriguez P, Granell M, Cano B, Rovira L, Morales J, Broseta A, Andres J. The erector spinae plane block: a narrative review. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun;72(3):209-220. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.19.00012. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

    PMID: 30886130BACKGROUND
  • Piccioni F, Ragazzi R. Anesthesia and analgesia: how does the role of anesthetists changes in the ERAS program for VATS lobectomy. J Vis Surg. 2018 Jan 11;4:9. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.12.11. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29445595BACKGROUND
  • Luis-Navarro JC, Seda-Guzman M, Luis-Moreno C, Lopez-Romero JL. The erector spinae plane block in 4 cases of video-assisted thoracic surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2018 Apr;65(4):204-208. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.12.004. Epub 2018 Jan 11. English, Spanish.

    PMID: 29336785BACKGROUND
  • Ince I, Ozmen O, Aksoy M, Zeren S, Ulas AB, Aydin Y. Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheter Insertion under Ultrasound Guidance for Thoracic Surgery: Case Series of Three Patients. Eurasian J Med. 2018 Oct;50(3):204-206. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.18147.

    PMID: 30515044BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Interventions

RopivacaineSodium Chloride

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium Compounds

Study Officials

  • Polona Gams, MD

    Surgery Bitenc

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Maja Šoštarič, MD, as. prof

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Masking the infusion mixture by using the same shape of the drug/placebo bottle and wrapping it into non-transparent sheath.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2019

First Posted

August 20, 2019

Study Start

October 14, 2019

Primary Completion

November 1, 2021

Study Completion

May 1, 2022

Last Updated

November 13, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Anonymous IPD may be shared.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
After the collection of data has finished.
Access Criteria
Primary researcher consent.

Locations