NCT04061629

Brief Summary

Based on standard and historical practice, the predictive size of the endotracheal tube (ETT) to be used in children has been based on various formulas. However, no study has clearly compared these formulas to determine the optimal size of cuffed ETTs. Furthermore, they were developed when using a polyvinylchloride cuff and not the thinner polyurethane cuff which is in common clinical use today. Hence, the purpose of this current study is to evaluate which of the currently available formulas most closely predicts the appropriate size of cuffed ETT to be used based not only on the fit within the trachea, but more importantly the intracuff pressure after the cuff is inflated to seal the airway.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
147

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 18, 2017

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 18, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 18, 2019

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 16, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 20, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 11, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

August 16, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 10, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of participants that needed their ETT exchanged

    Having to remove the original ETT and replacing it with a smaller or larger size due to excessive air leak or excessive pressure in the cuff.

    Immediately following intubation

Study Arms (3)

Group C

Size of the cuffed ETT based on the Cole formula = (Age/4) + 4.

Device: Cuffed ETT

Group D

size of the cuffed ETT based on the Duracher formula = (Age/4) + 3 + 0.5 mm.

Device: Cuffed ETT

Group K

size of the cuffed ETT based on the Khine formula = (Age/4) + 3.

Device: Cuffed ETT

Interventions

Cuffed endotracheal tube.

Group CGroup DGroup K

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 8 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Children requiring an endotracheal tube for surgery.

You may qualify if:

  • Children who are less than 8 years of age and are scheduled for surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation with a cuffed ETT.

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with airway anomalies or other factors that may impact tracheal size will be excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States

Location

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Associate Professor of Anesthesiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2019

First Posted

August 20, 2019

Study Start

September 18, 2017

Primary Completion

July 18, 2019

Study Completion

July 18, 2019

Last Updated

February 11, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Locations