Several studies have been done on the efficacy of the herbal medicine Iberogast. In this study researcher want to learn more about the time needed for Iberogast to start to work after the patient took the drug. This study plans to enroll 300 adult male and female patients suffering from disturbance of stomach and intestine normal function and treated by their doctor with Iberogast drops. Patients will be asked to document on a diary card the changes of symptom severity of the stomach and intestine complaints and the time needed for the symptoms to improve after drug intake. At the end of the study the treating doctor and the patients will be asked about the overall changes of symptoms. In addition information on the safety of the drug and how well the drug is tolerated by the patients will be collected
Registry Overview
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
Recruitment status
completed
Actual enrollment (reported)
272 participants
Study completion date
February 20, 2011
Actual (reported)
Listed locations
1 countries · 1 sites
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Related Scientific Literature
Loading related publications...
Study Timeline
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
Change of ratings of symptom severity on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) over time after intake of Iberogast
Visual Analogue Scale to evaluate the general severity of symptoms. It is an unmarked scale on a line 100 mm in length, indicating from 0 mm (no symptoms) to 100 mm (severe symptoms).
At baseline and up to 2 hours post-treatment on day 1
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 1
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 1
On day 1
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 2
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 2
On day 2
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 3
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 3
On day 3
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 4
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 4
On day 4
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 5
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 5
On day 5
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 6
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 6
On day 6
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 7
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 7
On day 7
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 8
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 8
On day 8
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The number of participants with adverse events
Up to 3 weeks
The number of participants who discontinued from treatment
Up to 3 weeks
The number of participants with the need of further treatment
Up to 3 weeks
Interventions
STW5 (Iberogast®, BAY98-7411)Drug
The medication was applied 3 x 20 drops per day orally, before or at meals with some liquid, ideally three weeks
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Eligibility Criteria
Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population
Male or female patients of at least 18 years were to be observed
You may qualify if:
At the discretion of physician under the instructions of Rome III criteria concerning functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the summary of product characteristics of Iberogast
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.