Manual Therapy Versus Conventional Rehabilitation Protocol on Subacromial Pain Syndrome

NCT04057170 | Completed DMC

• 1 other identifier: 0
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 42
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study compares the periodic effects of Accelerated rehabilitation protocol (ARP) and Mulligan mobilization with mowement method (MWM) in subacromial pain syndrome patients rehabilitation. Half of the participants will receive ARP, while the other half will receive MWM.

Conditions

Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Keywords

shoulder pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

  It consists of 13 questions in two sections as 5 pain questions and 8 disability questions. Both sections are scored with VAS. The total score range is between 0-130 and it is calculated with the percentage score. Pain and disability are inversely proportional with the percentage score

  two weeks

• Visual Analogue Scale

  to record pain intensity during rest and active shoulder movements. The patient is asked to mark the point corresponding to the pain (0 no pain and 10 maximal pain) on 10 cm horizontal line. The distance between the marked point and the beginning is recorded as a pain score

  two weeks

• Active Range of Motion measurement

  Conventional goniometer with 1° increments is used to determine shoulder limitations due to pain in patients

  two weeks

• Subacromial Interval Measurement

  Subacromial interval measurement was performed via anterior-posterior shoulder radiography

  six weeks

Study Arms (2)

mulligan method

EXPERIMENTAL

Mulligan mobilization with mowement method every three days for six weeks

Other: accelerated protocol and mulligan method

accelerated protocol

EXPERIMENTAL

accelerated rehabilitation protocol every three days for six weeks

Other: accelerated protocol and mulligan method

Interventions

accelerated protocol and mulligan method OTHER

manual therapy technic

accelerated protocol; mulligan method

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 60 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• to be in the 18-60 age range, to be cooperative during evaluation and treatment and to accept to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

• the presence of adhesive capsulitis, surgical indication or shoulder surgery, cervicothoracic problems (such as stenosis and disc herniation) diagnosed as neurological or inflammatory joint diseases

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Cukurova University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Volkan Deniz

Ankara, 06560, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome; Shoulder Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Shoulder Injuries; Wounds and Injuries; Arthralgia; Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Signs and Symptoms; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Director, Clinical Research

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 13, 2019
• First Posted: August 15, 2019
• Study Start: March 1, 2018
• Primary Completion: October 1, 2018
• Study Completion: November 30, 2018
• Last Updated: August 15, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

TU (1)