Bicarbonate vs Heparin Catheter Lock in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients
BICATH
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prospective clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of catheter lock with bicarbonate vs heparin in chronic hemodialysis patients. Two groups will be created, sodium bicarbonate lock group (experimental group) and heparin lock group (control group). Catheter pressures, flow, patency and infection outcomes will be compare between groups at different time points (30, 60 and 90 days).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Sep 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 11, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 28, 2020
CompletedApril 30, 2020
April 1, 2020
5 months
July 23, 2019
April 28, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Arterial line pressure at fixed blood flow in sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock catheters in chronic hemodialysis patients
Arterial line pressure\[mmHg\] at 300 mL/min blood flow will be compared between sodium bicarbonate lock and heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients.
30 days.
Arterial line pressure at fixed blood flow in sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock catheters in chronic hemodialysis patients
Arterial line pressure\[mmHg\] at 300 mL/min blood flow will be compared between sodium bicarbonate lock and heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients.
60 days
Arterial line pressure at fixed blood flow in sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock catheters in chronic hemodialysis patients
Arterial line pressure\[mmHg\] at 300 mL/min blood flow will be compared between sodium bicarbonate lock and heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients.
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Incidence rate of catheter related bloodstream infection
90 days
Incidence rate of catheter thrombosis
90 days
Adverse events incidence
90 days
Study Arms (2)
Sodium bicarbonate catheter lock group (SBCL)
EXPERIMENTALChronic hemodialysis patients with a catheter as a vascular access, will be lock with sodium bicarbonate 7.5% Injection.
Heparin catheter lock group (HCL)
ACTIVE COMPARATORChronic hemodialysis patients with a catheter as a vascular access, will be lock with heparin, 1000 Units/mL injectable solution
Interventions
Sodium bicarbonate solution for catheter lock; 7.5% sodium bicarbonate solution will be used for catheter lock in both catheter lumens, 1.9 mL in each catheter lumen will be infused after hemodialysis treatment during 3 months.
Heparin for catheter lock: 1000 u/mL heparin solution will be used for catheter lock in both catheter lumens as standard treatment, 1.9 mL in each catheter lumen will be infused after hemodialysis treatment during 3 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who accept participation and sign informed consent.
- Incident or prevalent chronic hemodialysis patients who receive at least 2 sessions per week with 1 month of clinical stability defined as: no hospitalizations, no vascular access infections, no changes in blood flow prescription due to vascular access dysfunction.
- Patients with temporal catheter (Niagra 13.5 French/20 cm length, BARD Access System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) as vascular access for hemodialysis.
You may not qualify if:
- Catheter dysfunction at baseline
- On anticoagulation therapy
- Patients with known coagulopathy or hemophilia
- Patients with Child-Pugh B or C liver failure
- Patients with thrombocytopenia less than 100,000 u / L
- Patients with central vessel stenosis and vena cava syndrome, previously documented.
- Patients with vascular access exhaustion.
- Patients who have undergone more than 2 vascular approaches for hemodialysis catheters.
- Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" de Morelia
Morelia, Michoacán, 58020, Mexico
Related Publications (15)
Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, Li Z, Naicker S, Plattner B, Saran R, Wang AY, Yang CW. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):260-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60687-X. Epub 2013 May 31.
PMID: 23727169BACKGROUNDMa A, Shroff R, Hothi D, Lopez MM, Veligratli F, Calder F, Rees L. A comparison of arteriovenous fistulas and central venous lines for long-term chronic haemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013 Feb;28(2):321-6. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2318-2. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
PMID: 23052655BACKGROUNDAdib-Hajbaghery M, Molavizadeh N, Alavi NM. Quality of care of vascular access in hemodialysis patients in a hemodialysis center in Iran. J Vasc Nurs. 2012 Mar;30(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2011.10.002.
PMID: 22321404BACKGROUNDAgharazii M, Plamondon I, Lebel M, Douville P, Desmeules S. Estimation of heparin leak into the systemic circulation after central venous catheter heparin lock. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Jun;20(6):1238-40. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh841. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
PMID: 15855206BACKGROUNDMoran JE, Ash SR; ASDIN Clinical Practice Committee. Locking solutions for hemodialysis catheters; heparin and citrate--a position paper by ASDIN. Semin Dial. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):490-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00466.x. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
PMID: 18764795BACKGROUNDChen FK, Li JJ, Song Y, Zhang YY, Chen P, Zhao CZ, Gong HY, Yao DF. Concentrated sodium chloride catheter lock solution--a new effective alternative method for hemodialysis patients with high bleeding risk. Ren Fail. 2014 Feb;36(1):17-22. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2013.830207. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
PMID: 23992231BACKGROUNDPalomo I, Pereira J, Alarcon M, Diaz G, Hidalgo P, Pizarro I, Jara E, Rojas P, Quiroga G, Moore-Carrasco R. Prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2005;19(5):189-95. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20076.
PMID: 16170812BACKGROUNDYon CK, Low CL. Sodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a lock solution in hemodialysis patients with central venous catheters. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Jan 15;70(2):131-6. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120300.
PMID: 23292266BACKGROUNDShanks RM, Sargent JL, Martinez RM, Graber ML, O'Toole GA. Catheter lock solutions influence staphylococcal biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Aug;21(8):2247-55. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl170. Epub 2006 Apr 20.
PMID: 16627606BACKGROUNDZhao Y, Li Z, Zhang L, Yang J, Yang Y, Tang Y, Fu P. Citrate versus heparin lock for hemodialysis catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):479-90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
PMID: 24125729BACKGROUNDBeigi AA, HadiZadeh MS, Salimi F, Ghaheri H. Heparin compared with normal saline to maintain patency of permanent double lumen hemodialysis catheters: A randomized controlled trial. Adv Biomed Res. 2014 May 28;3:121. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.133192. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24949292BACKGROUNDZhong L, Wang HL, Xu B, Yuan Y, Wang X, Zhang YY, Ji L, Pan ZM, Hu ZS. Normal saline versus heparin for patency of central venous catheters in adult patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017 Jan 8;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1585-x.
PMID: 28063456BACKGROUNDWong DW, Mishkin FS, Tanaka TT. The effects of bicarbonate on blood coagulation. JAMA. 1980 Jul 4;244(1):61-2.
PMID: 7382058BACKGROUNDFarha MA, French S, Stokes JM, Brown ED. Bicarbonate Alters Bacterial Susceptibility to Antibiotics by Targeting the Proton Motive Force. ACS Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 9;4(3):382-390. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00194. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
PMID: 29264917BACKGROUNDNostro A, Cellini L, Di Giulio M, D'Arrigo M, Marino A, Blanco AR, Favaloro A, Cutroneo G, Bisignano G. Effect of alkaline pH on staphylococcal biofilm formation. APMIS. 2012 Sep;120(9):733-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2012.02900.x. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
PMID: 22882263BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Israel Campos, M.D.
Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" de Morelia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Nephrology fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2019
First Posted
August 13, 2019
Study Start
September 11, 2019
Primary Completion
February 20, 2020
Study Completion
September 28, 2020
Last Updated
April 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share