Comparison of Different Feeding Protocols for the Treatment of Acute Malnutrition
Comparison Between Different Feeding Protocols and Existing Protocol for the Treatment of Acute Malnutrition (A Cluster Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Though malnutrition is prevalent worldwide but its situation is alarming in low- and middle-income countries. Pakistan has also been facing an alarming situation of prevailing severe malnutrition. Malnutrition in its any form costs a huge intolerable burden not only on national health care system, but also on social and economic fabric of the nation. The current management of severe malnutrition is based on World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and protocols which has been evolved from expert opinions and observational studies. The principles of these protocols have emerged from emergency settings and converting these protocols for developing countries where severe malnutrition, a routine burden is a critical challenge. In the absence of standard protocols for the treatment of uncomplicated severe malnutrition in non-emergency settings it is important to test and optimize different approaches to treat severely acute malnutrition (SAM). It is hypothesized that by optimizing, adapting and implementing time oriented and resource intensive approaches, a huge burden of high cost of RUTF may be reduced. While RUTF may be utilized to treat SAM children in emergency settings, it is not a substitute of local household foods. Therefore, a pilot study has been conducted to compare the various treatment protocols for malnourished children. We specifically hypothesized that a reduced dose of RUTF for reduced duration, combined with age-appropriate food intake from locally available resources can treat uncomplicated SAM children cost effectively as compared to standard national Community Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) protocol currently implemented in Punjab, Pakistan.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 10, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2019
CompletedAugust 5, 2019
August 1, 2019
5 months
July 29, 2019
August 2, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Growth velocity
Weight in Kg
3 months
Growth velocity
Height in cm
3 months
Growth velocity
Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) in cm
3 months
Duration of recovery from SAM
Time required each child to reach MUAC \> 11.5
3 months
Rate of relapse
Number of children relapsed during the trial
3 months
Rate of mortality
Number of children dying during trial
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Rate of recovery from Moderate Acute Malnutrition in 1st group
3 months
Number of children having diarrhoea and acute respiratory infection during trial
3 months
Number of children not coming for follow up visits due to any reason
3 months
Study Arms (3)
1st Group
NO INTERVENTIONChildren were treated as per standard CMAM protocols; provided RUTF until MUAC reaches 11.5 cm
2nd Group (1st Intervention group)
EXPERIMENTALChildren were initially provided RUTF until MUAC reach 11 cm then 50 % calories were provided from RUTF and 50% calories from home based food
3rd Group (2nd Intervention)
EXPERIMENTALChildren were initially provided RUTF until MUAC reach 11 cm then 100 % calories provided from home based food
Interventions
Home based food is compare able to RUTF
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children 6-59 months with MUAC \<11.5cm and Weight for Height Z score \< -3SD
- Having good appetite, alert and clinically well
You may not qualify if:
- WHZ score - 4 SD
- MUAC \< 8 cm
- Secondary malnutrition diagnosed by a gastroenterologist and dietitian
- Family History
- Birth Anomolies
- Any hidden/ asymptomatic health conditions
- Any patient coming from out of city (Lahore)
- Anorexia
- High fever (\>104 F)
- Severe pallor
- Severe dehydration
- Lower respiratory tract infection
- Bipedal edema
- Visible severe wasting
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Children's Hospital & The Institute of Child Health
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zahra Khan, PhD
IRMNCH & Nutrition Program
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2019
First Posted
August 5, 2019
Study Start
December 10, 2018
Primary Completion
April 25, 2019
Study Completion
April 25, 2019
Last Updated
August 5, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share